And while many US citizens seem to imagine that someone convicted of «hooliganism motivated
by religious hatred» would get off lighter here, they're wrong in the cases of numerous states.
They've now been charged with 2 years of «hooliganism motivated
by religious hatred».
So three members of the Russian feminist band Pussy Riot have been convicted to two years in prison for «hooliganism motivated
by religious hatred».
I was pleased when I read in The New Yorker that Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, one of the three members of the Russian feminist punk - rock band Pussy Riot serving time in prison for «hooliganism motivated
by religious hatred ``, spends her time in a small four woman cell reading.
Fifteen Muslim migrants face charges of murder fueled
by religious hatred after allegedly throwing a dozen Christian migrants overboard this week during a sea crossing from northern Africa to Italy.
Not exact matches
The quran, unlike other
religious books, mentions the other religions
by name condoning
hatred and violence specifically against Jews and Christians and non believers
The absolute
hatred of gays and lesbians
by religious people just baffles me to no end.
You can just see
by the comments left on the internet what
religious hatred there is here.
Not only are we constantly being bombarded
by the
religious beliefs of the faithful (Christians mostly in America) we can see how
religious beliefs are stifling human progress and perpetuating
hatred and segregation.
Those books were inspired
by Atheists and have inspired more
hatred and killing than all the
religious wars combined.
So, if God is pure love, why do religions continue to embrace the
hatred and vitriol espoused
by many modern - day
religious figures?
«
Hatred» isn't ok from the secular side just because it was displayed
by the
religious side.
Intergroup tensions and conflicts are based on hard vested interests, on ancient and newly invented
hatreds, and on emotional and ideological needs, none of which is easily influenced
by religious sermonizing, let alone
by theological argumentation.
in America to let federal / state security agencies MONITOR them for anti-state activities (knowing fully well that
by FBI's own estimates over 80 % of American Mosques preach some form of
religious hatred).
Burleigh builds a conclusive case that those most responsible for paving the way for Auschwitz were not Christians reading and preaching the gospel but instead were atheists, apostates, and revolutionaries who promoted a «
hatred against the Lord and His Christ nourished
by groups subversive to any
religious and social order,» as the papal encyclical Dilectissima Nobis (1933) put it.
His overt racism and
hatred to all those not equally zealous and blinded
by Religion is amazingly obvious and should be a wake - up call to moderates in the
religious rank and file.
The report of the NCC mission reliably parroted the position of Israel's neighboring enemies while omitting any mention of, inter alia, the anti-Semitic
hatred daily spewed
by the Arab media, official Arab support for Palestinian suicide bombers, Muslim prohibition of Christian (and, needless to say, Jewish)
religious practice, and the conspicuous absence of democracy or freedom of expression in all the countries of the region except Israel.
The
hatred you mention is caused
by religious beliefs people have.
But little
by little the Christian,
religious substance of his message and preaching was weakened, and in time his movement became a revolt pure and simple, full of
hatred and a passion for looting.
Any defamation of the country and the nation, any instigation to a war of aggression, to national, racial, class or
religious hatred, any incitement to discrimination, territorial separatism, or public violence, as well as any obscene conduct contrary to morality shall be prohibited
by law.
Just a few of these include: restrictions trial
by jury, DNA databases, ID cards, a Civil Contingency Act that gives the government the power to rule
by decree, control orders, the
Religious Hatred Bill and a definition of glorifying terrorism that was drafted so widely that the Irish Taiseoch was reckoned to be at serous risk of annual prosecution commemorating the Easter Rising.
Many Muslims are genuinely incensed
by the «Innocence of Muslims»: they see it as blatant attack on their beloved Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), and as part of a series of «attacks» and
hatred for their
religious sanctity they see as coming from the US.
When India won home rule after WWII and was divided into Muslim Pakistan and Hindu India, deep
religious hatreds that had been somewhat subdued
by having a common enemy in the British flared up.
However, with an excellent script from Gregory Burke, ’71 is instead both a sensory survival story and a surprisingly subtle look at the clashing ideals that fuelled the conflict, from the unthinking
religious hatred underpinning it all to the vying factions within the IRA itself, spurred on
by an undercover British unit intent on de-stabilising the city even further.
Despite the Racial and
Religious Hatred Act 2006 (RRHA 2006) receiving Royal Assent on 16 February 2006, it was hoped
by many commentators that no commencement order would ever be made for this potentially troublesome Act.