Not counting this form of compensation as an expense was a ridiculous accounting practice, and one that was supported
by ridiculous arguments by lobbyists and the lawmakers who wanted to protect their corporate constituents who were getting rich.
Not counting this form of compensation as an expense was a ridiculous accounting practice, and one that was supported
by ridiculous arguments by lobbyists and the lawmakers who wanted to protect their corporate constituents who were getting rich.
Not exact matches
Any attempt at applying «logic» to explain the bible
by people who are believers and still think of themselves as rather intelligent (self - delusion is a symptom / cause of religious belief) always ends up in
ridiculous arguments...
I'm not going to engage in this
ridiculous argument anymore.They are regarded
by UK obstetricians as professional equals.
People argue against it
by saying, «Hey, you know the carbon footprint of flying food thousands of miles is
ridiculous so we should grow [things] locally» but the counter
argument is, but if you can grow so much wheat sufficiently in Kansas even including the transportation for thousands of miles it's still more efficient in terms of resources.
Taking up the same baseless, tired, and nostalgic
arguments used
by Charles Murray (and citing that tired polemicist's overly long claptrap, Real Education) Gardner declares that the focus on college is
ridiculous because some kids in his mind aren't «college material» and that many jobs don't require higher education.
This is almost identical to the «temp changes
by 15 - 20C over the course of year in some places; therefore, getting worked up over 0.7 C in fifty years is
ridiculous»
argument.
I see the same
ridiculous, already debunked
arguments used
by anti-AGW people on this forum every time one of these articles comes up.