Sentences with phrase «by right and wrong»

And I think there's almost a contradiction in that because what was chosen to be put in the curriculum was chosen because it's the sort of stuff that is best tested by right and wrong answers.

But this leaves us with a responsibility to define what we mean by right and wrong.

Not exact matches

Even if it's costly to right a wrong, consider the good will that you will gain by admitting to a mistake and going the extra mile to fix it.

There's always a right and a wrong side of every street, and before you rent your retail space, stand out front and count how many people walk by the door.

If making you ethical was the aim, then ethics education would be either redundant or hopeless: critics are probably right to think that a basic understanding of right and wrong is either there by the time kids enter university or it isn't.

Empathy motivates them to live by their morals determining what is right and wrong.

And Cosby's conviction fits all too well into the current #MeToo narrative of Hollywood giants being toppled mostly by unfamous women seeking to right past wrongs.

In the worst case, you can lose the right customers by redirecting your strategy and resources in an attempt to satisfy the needs of the wrong ones.

They feel frustrated that they did the «right» thing by going to college and it turned out wrong.

By of Dollars and Data Convincing yourself that you're right when you know you're wrong is a time - honored tradition in the markets By Ben Carlson Your true worth is determined by how.By of Dollars and Data Convincing yourself that you're right when you know you're wrong is a time - honored tradition in the markets By Ben Carlson Your true worth is determined by how.By Ben Carlson Your true worth is determined by how.by how...

If earlier this year you predicted that unemployment would climb higher than 10 % and that the market would be crushed, would you now be considered half - right or half - wrong by your followers?

They start by getting the right people on the bus, the wrong people off the bus, and the right people in the right seats.

By virtue of all the fake statistics and bogus market action, there has to be something seriously wrong right now.

Scenarios like these will continue to happen b / c of this issue and I don't think the kid did anything wrong by doing what he felt was morally right.

But if you look at the bible and how christians use it by picking out what parts they agree with and dismissing the horror of it as «cultural of the times» it says to me that their sense of right and wrong is more evolved than the book they claim is the final authority of right and wrong.

Perhaps a modern paraphrase for us today would be: «If I have my doctrinal statement nailed down flawlessly and am able to prove myself right by quoting verses to support my theology, but do not have love, I am dead wrong.»

By the way, Atheists don't need to be told what is right and wrong, we know what is and do follow the «Teachings of Jesus» we just don't believe that there is a God, that is just silly.

It goes without saying that I agree with Pete's center - right agenda below, with its mend them, don't end them approach to our minimalist entitlements and its due concern for doing everything that can be done to sustain our nongovernmental intermediary institutions (which, of course can be choked by too much or the wrong kind of government).

Opposing views of right and wrong are best addressed and accommodated in a democratic political debate, with the judiciary serving the vital but secondary role of ensuring that basic rights are protected to prevent oppression of minorities by majoritarian rule.

Blindly declare that you are right and all others are wrong by default even though you have no evidence or proof to back up your a $ $ ertions.

Also, morality is not external (if byexternal that you mean something that you can know is right or wrong has to be determined by a larger body or set of policies created by someone else many years ago to be official), and morality does not necessarily flow from religion (plenty of Catholic priests, Islamic Imams, Protestant preachers wave their hands high in the air in the afternoon, at praise time, and when the lights go down they crawl on their bellies, and hands and knees like snakes and dogs).

The Right has a philosophy of absolute right and wrong given down historically either by kings or deiRight has a philosophy of absolute right and wrong given down historically either by kings or deiright and wrong given down historically either by kings or deities.

The outstanding example, of course, is the Chinese government's long - running «one - child policy,» replete with forced abortions, public trackings of menstrual cycles, family flight, increased female infanticide, sterilization, and other assaults too numerous even to begin cataloguing here — in fact, so numerous that they are now widely, if often grudgingly, acknowledged as wrongs even by international human - rights bureaucracies.

the bible is a record of things that are wrong and not condoned by God as well as proscriptions about the right thing to do.

The Truth regarding Man is, we are all individual islands controlled by our individual consciousness and no matter how much religion or education one has, it's ones day to day conscious decision to decide to do right or wrong.

In the place of right and wrong — concepts accessible to all citizens — we get «healthy,» «productive,» «inclusive,» and other catchwords, the meanings of which are controlled by experts and subject to endless redefinition by the chattering class.

You may feel it's wrong to steal, but if another person feels it's right to steal, you have no objective reference by which to say he is wrong and you are right; you are at an impasse.

Right and wrong are human constructs and also determined by society.

Likewise when God says «Let there be light,» that is much more understandable by saying it means the «Light of Understanding,» like invention of language and tools, and the knowledge of right and wrong.

------------ Your as.sumption is that notions of «right» and «wrong» are based solely on whether or not someone else is harmed by the act.

God's Politics: Why the Right Gets It Wrong and the Left Doesn't Get It By Jim Wallis HarperSanFranciso.

So the real questions are: 1) how can there even be a universal understanding of «right» and «wrong» without a creator 2) how can purely random genetic mutations preserved by natural selection have resulted in the desire to do «right» even amongst those that do not believe in life after death?

Theresa keep what you were doing when you reached out to the homeless lady that was the right thing to do that was motivated by the holy spirit do nt follow what the church does do what the Lord wants you to do and it will bear fruit.Let them do there thing you just keep following the Lord and listen to him in your heart and let him lead you.People do things for different reasons to please others for power to be seen to do the right thing all those are the wrong reasons they are just dead works without the Lord we can do nothing.Dont let others turn you away from what the Lord wants you to do its him we need to please always.Be encouraged that the Lord used you to touch a life that is awesome.And do nt take the rejection personally because its not you they are pushing away it is the Lord the yare not listening to him but doing wha tthey want to do it will bear no fruit.May the Lord bless you and your family in your ministry step out in faith and trust him he will not disappoint you because he is with you.

I allow myself, by my observer standpoint and scholarly method, to absent myself from any confrontation either in my teaching or in my life with the pressing issues of right and wrong.

It would be taken up in the order of grace and would be governed by the wisdom of the soul, not by the material environment, in terms of right and wrong, good and bad.

«I was attacking the argument that gay people must be discriminated against — and anti-bullying programs that address anti-gay bullying should be blocked (or exceptions should be made for bullying «motivated by faith»)-- because it says right there in the Bible that being gay is wrong.»

I can teach «religious studies» as though it were a branch of aesthetics, never allowing either myself or my students to be challenged by «the discernment of right and wrong» that is wisdom.

It is a riff on the problems I've seen in people in leadership roles that I have no other way to interpret but as them demonstrating sociopathological behaviors — no apparent conscience touched by issues of right / wrong, no apparent compassion and empathy for others who are suffering or how their own abusive actions induce suffering.

Our difficulty in speaking about cross-cultural principles of right and wrong is compounded by the fact that international organizations, from the United Nations to the World Court, are fragile and nearly helpless in many of the most critical areas of conflict.

They have a lot of work to do, a lot of wrongs to right, and serious changes to make but this pope leads by example, and for that I can't fault him.

Blindly declare you are right and all others are wrong by default without any evidence or proof to back up your a $ $ ertions.

As a result, everything else went wrong, and stays wrong until made right by God.

I agree with not going trying to change the world as in change to people by telling them they are wrong and I am right (IF I have understood your point of view) but I guess I'm not so convinced when it comes to society, and just accepting what ever **** is in there or anywhere.

Values that are held in common are treated as moral absolutes; values that are opposed by certain Christians are presented as controversial, and a neutral stance is adopted regarding which view is right or wrong.

Lincoln, he believes, renewed the theory of statecraft by insisting that «ultimate moral questions did not admit of relativistic interpretations,» while knowing at the same time that the attempt to right moral wrongs may have tragic consequences and almost certainly will not achieve unqualified success.

«My nation, right or wrong,» is okay by me, so long as I am free to say with my patriotism and my human integrity intact, «But in this instance my nation is wrong!»

Many of these are reinforced by group activities based on values clarification, which tend towards rejecting external moral restrictions and setting up the individual as the judge of what is right and wrong for them.

Saying god exists does not make that so... of course the opposite is true as well... all the pundits here (and Hawking) who like to call things by descriptive names like «fairy tales» do so because they are desperate to be right in this matter... because no one can be proven right or wrong in this I choose to respect the faith that some have in Science as well as thos who have faith in God's existence.

While I can prove Phil Roberston's assessment wrong by opening up any book on the Jim Crow Era and the Civil Right Movement, I don't think that would create space for Shalom.

Oh, the Calvinists could make perfect sense of it all with a wave of a hand and a swift, confident explanation about how Zarmina had been born in sin and likely predestined to spend eternity in hell to the glory of an angry God (they called her a «vessel of destruction»); about how I should just be thankful to be spared the same fate since it's what I deserve anyway; about how the Asian tsunami was just another one of God's temper tantrums sent to remind us all of His rage at our sin; about how I need not worry because «there is not one maverick molecule in the universe» so every hurricane, every earthquake, every war, every execution, every transaction in the slave trade, every rape of a child is part of God's sovereign plan, even God's idea; about how my objections to this paradigm represented unrepentant pride and a capitulation to humanism that placed too much inherent value on my fellow human beings; about how my intuitive sense of love and morality and right and wrong is so corrupted by my sin nature I can not trust it.