To make informed choices on the challenges facing us we need evidence backed up
by robust science, but we rarely stop to question how well our representatives support or understand science issues in Europe.
Not exact matches
Luckily, criminal and forensic psychologists have been trying to explain violent disorder and theft for years, and given their regular bullying
by the «harder»
sciences, have plenty of experience in justifying their
robust techniques and principles.
«Articulating what the right to
science means in practice has the potential to serve as a watershed moment
by providing the basis for governments and civil society, including the scientific community, to assess the extent to which any government is adequately supporting a
robust scientific enterprise,» Wyndham said in her presentation.
Professor Gary England, Foundation Dean of the School of Veterinary Medicine and
Science and Professor of Comparative Veterinary Reproduction, who oversaw the collection of semen said: «The strength of the study is that all samples were processed and analysed
by the same laboratory using the same protocols during that time and consequently the data generated is
robust.»
Joanna Lewis, an associate professor of
science, technology and international affairs at Georgetown University's Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service, said China's wind power sector has also been aided
by a steep decline in manufacturing and installation costs, as well as the establishment of a
robust domestic supply chain, led
by the nation's industry leader, Goldwind.
Renowned for devising means for young people, teachers, and parents to conduct sophisticated experiments with DNA, the DNALC also has a
robust presence on the Internet, powered
by a team of multimedia innovators who bring knowledge of the life
sciences to the digital world.
This has been shown to me over the last 2 decades of patient experience, the continual outpouring of supporting
science, first pertaining to insulin, then leptin, then mTOR and the now very
robust science over the last decade pertaining to the biology of aging... and also
by the numerous well known low carb diets that have ultimately modified their original programs to try to morph into mine.
is powered
by proven nutritional
science,
robust behavioral data, and customer - centered software development.
However, we believe the art of teaching should also be informed
by a
robust understanding of the learning
sciences so that teachers can align their decisions with our profession's best understanding of how students learn.
Acquire and implement 41 key competencies revealed
by research for effective teaching in a
robust, yet easy to understand model of instruction, based on the Art and
Science of Teaching
The solutions would start with economically diverse housing options in all towns in CT, quality pre-natal care, quality pediatric care, high school courses on parenting, in - home parenting classes for teens, a
robust curriculum rich in the arts, social
sciences,
science, math, and character education, lots of playtime in a safe literature rich environment for pre-schoolers, summer school and before and after school care provided
by TFA or some other organization of young recent college graduates, small class size, teacher leaders instead of building administrators, and collaboration time built into the school day.
The Marzano Protocol, powered
by iObservation, identifies the 41 key strategies revealed
by research for effective teaching presented in a
robust, easy - to - understand model of instruction based on the Art and
Science of Teaching.
This will serve as a powerful education tool for the community
by providing data in real time and also advance the Center's existing
robust science and sustainability solutions curriculum for youth.
Or for a more
robust foundation in marine
science enrol in the Scientific Diver program followed
by the one - week PADI Divemaster add - on.
These decisions and trade - offs should be guided
by robust evidence, with global - change
science investigating the connections and tradeoffs between the state of the environment and human well - being in the context of the local setting, rather than
by framing and reframing environmental challenges in terms of untestable assumptions about the virtues of past environments.
In a more conventional field, in which highly technical papers were published in professional journals rather than Nature or
Science, the paper would be read
by the few experts, who over the next few years would try to understand what it all means, whether it is really new, what the weaknesses might be, do their own analyses to see how
robust the results are, and ask if there are conflicting data sets.
First that you have misjudged the chronology on how the IPCC formed, second, echoed
by many, that it was too broad brushed (von Storch and Kloor), it doesn't take into account how the IPCC bureaucracy has turned over several times over the years (Eli Rabbet), you've never provided proof as to how the IPCC's control extends out into the academic realm, and it completely overlooks all the other possibilities, ie, the strength of the
science is
robust and the risk dire enough to receive to the amount of funding, attention, etc. and any other option at the time would have been outrageous, especially considering that what has been predicted is currently happening.
GO -
Science «supports the Government Chief Scientific Adviser and works to ensure that Government policy and decision - making is underpinned
by robust scientific evidence».
The critical missing piece of information here is that
science related to climate change is much more
robust than what can be challenged
by excerpts from a few private emails (of hundreds) stolen from a server.
To say that the
science beyond «global cooling» / «new ice age» in the 1970's was anywhere near as
robust or accepted
by scientists in the field (as opposed to bored journalists and second tier
science fiction authors) is simply untrue.
by Judith Curry Last week, I was privileged to host the UK - US Workshop on Climate
Science Needed to Support
Robust Adaptation Decisions.
It's a shame that some of the sceptics have had to take this rather shallow attempt to discredit
robust science undertaken
by some of the world's most respected scientists...
«The
science of climate change remains
robust and is unchanged
by any of the media hype of the last few months,» said Melanie Fitzpatrick, a climate scientist with the Union of Concerned Scientists.
As this analysis indicates, consensus corruption of empirical
science by U.S. scientists is active and
robust, done with a seemingly obvious intent to deceive.
Yes of course Titley would like us to believe that the peer - review process is credible and
robust because that way, he and his similarly slippery colleagues might be able to wriggle out of the proposal currently being touted
by EPA chief Scott Pruitt that there should be a Red Team / Blue Team reassessment of the state of climate
science.
If
by chance someone pointed out that some of the
science was not
robust, based on your theory what would / should happen?
Andrew Montford's observation comes in response to an article
by Gavin Schmidt, in which he apparently shows more reflection on the problems of
science and advocacy than I would have expected, given his
robust statements about «deniers», and his refusal to debate with more sceptical climate scientists in the past, and his impatience with his scientific critics, to the delight of climate activists.
The IPCC, and the climate
science community as a whole, evidently considers this observationally - based - scaling approach to be a more
robust way of identifying the influence of aerosols and other inhomogeneous forcings than the almost purely climate - model - simulations - based approach used
by Shindell.
I will say this for US Sen. James Inhofe (R - Exxon): his relentlessly ideological view of
science isolates him from the world, but at least that isolation is so
robust and seamless that there's not much risk of reality intruding and causing him to frighten the horses
by saying something rational.
All Pledges Fall Short of the
Science Ultimately, though the emission cuts proposed for 2020
by the Kyoto Protocol members are dramatically more
robust than those being mulled over in the Washington, none are in the 25 - 40 % range which scientists say is required to keep global average temperature rise below the critical threshold of 2 °C.
Driven
by technological advancements in logistics technology, AI, and data
science, it's now possible to scale boots - on - the - ground operations with
robust back - office systems in real estate and offer a completely new customer experience to buy or rent real estate.»