Note however, that the problem is caused by legal advice services, and not
by routine legal services that are mostly routine paper - work, such as simple house sales, wills, incorporating small companies, and such.
But the problem of unaffordable legal services is caused by the high cost of legal advice services, not
by routine legal services such as simple real estate deals, divorces, and incorporations.
Not exact matches
Such an institute could provide a single bargaining agency on behalf of all lawyers in Canada,
by which to obtain the automation of
routine legal services, and not have to endure ownership
by a commercial investor to get it, as proposed
by the ABS investors.
Those lawyers and investors who wish to have ABSs made
legal are looking to make a return on investment
by way of providing
routine legal services in greater volume.
They could finance the automation for providing
routine legal services, but such automation is something that the
legal profession can provide for itself, better
by itself without: (1) law offices having to be owned
by investors; and, (2) the risk of the fiduciary duty owed to clients being suppressed
by the resulting profit duty owed to investors.
Dundas & Wilson has launched a new paralegal - led
Legal Services Unit (LSU) in Scotland, which is intended to cut costs for clients
by taking on
routine work often carried out
by qualified lawyers.
«Over the last few years, lawyers in India selling
services offshore have focused mainly on the
routine grunt work that is often done
by junior lawyers, such as research, in which lawyers comb through
legal documents searching for information to back up a case.»
They have three parts: (1) law firms can be invested in (owned — up to 49 % or 100 %)
by non-lawyer people and entities; (2)
legal services be enabled to be provided with related non-
legal services; and, (3)
routine legal services be automated
by software applications.
Many of the
services that law firms now provide, such as managing documents in litigation or due diligence, are being done
by new vendors like NovusLaw, which markets itself as «The Compelling Alternative for
Routine Legal Work,» and promises to do that work «faster, better, cheaper» than a full -
service law firm.
As to financing such development
by Canada's lawyers (instead of
by commercial investors) of software for automating the delivery of
routine legal services: more than $ 11 million could be raised if every lawyer in Canada paid an addition one - time $ 100 increase in annual law society fees.
With good law society leadership, the automating of
routine legal services with software «apps» can be done
by Canada's
legal profession itself.
They can perhaps speed the adoption of innovations such as the «packaging» of those
routine legal services that can be provided more cost - efficiently
by software applications such as for writing simple wills and incorporating small companies.
Or, because of the commercial producers of
legal services» eating into the
routine legal services market of the general practitioner (e.g., LegalZoom, LegalX, RocketLawyer), as a profession we will shrink in size, purpose, and importance, and our law societies proportionately diminished
by all such measures.
The solution, if there is one, is either to (i) provide greater public subsidies for
legal aid / community clinics to serve a broader range of Ontarians or (ii) change the regulatory environment to allow for the cheaper provision of «
routine»
legal services by paralegals (this latter approach, I suspect, would go over like a lead balloon amongst my fellow lawyers).