«Unless I am convinced
by sacred Scripture, or by evident reason, I can not recant,» he told the church authorities in 1521, «for my conscience is held captive by the word of God, and to act against conscience is neither right nor safe.»
Not exact matches
Scriptures are
sacred treasures held in trust
by one community, but for the benefit of all people.
A growing number of people have
by now found inspiration in the
sacred scriptures of the world and have been willing to join together in prayer with members of different religions.
We can best do this
by looking at what we like to call the pre-literate
sacred scriptures.
The Gregorian sound, and the practice of chanting, whether
by specialists or
by non-specialists, gives the most perfect context for the hearing of the words of the
sacred scripture.
«To speak of God's Kingdom,» says Wright, «is thus to invoke God as the sovereign one who has the right, the duty, and the power to deal appropriately with evil in the world, in Israel, and in human beings, and thereupon to remake the world, Israel, and human beings... When full allowance is made for the striking differences of genre and emphasis within
scripture, we may propose that Israel's
sacred writings were the place where, and the means
by which, Israel discovered again and again who the true God was, and how his Kingdom - purposes were being taken forward... Through
scripture, God was equipping his people to serve his purposes.»
(CCC: 2500) People have always been drawn to Christian faith
by the
sacred beauty that the Church offers us in the revelation of God in Jesus,
scripture, liturgy, sacraments, lives of the saints,
sacred art, miracles of conversion and healing, and in her own very nature.
He challenges their narrowness
by referring to
Scripture, convicting them from the very source they claim to hold
sacred (Lk 4, 25 - 27).
Martin Luther had similar thoughts: «Nor can a Christian believer be forced beyond
sacred Scriptures,... unless some new and proved revelation should be added; for we are forbidden
by divine law to believe except what is proved either through the divine
Scriptures or through Manifest revelation.»
This reality makes us aware that every narrow definition of Christian doctrinal certainty will finally have to be abandoned; every claim
by any branch of the Christian church to be the true church or the only church will ultimately have to be sacrificed; every doctrine of infallibility — whether of the papacy, or of the
Scriptures, or of any
sacred tradition, or of any individual experience — will inevitably have to be forgotten.
It still presupposed the Old Testament — not however, as the
sacred Law of God binding upon one particular nation, but as the
scripture of an independent religious movement
by which it was now reinterpreted.
- wine must be equated with blood, in this case the blood of Christ, since all through the
Scriptures this «is foretold
by sacred type and testimony.»
By contrast, the traditional Catholic (and Orthodox) conception of the relationship does have the Church standing in judgment over
Scripture in some sense, for as the Catechism forthrightly states, «the Church discerned which writings are to be included in the list of
sacred books» (emphasis added).
Prof. Levenson notes that, among other differences between traditional Judaism and Christianity ignored
by Dabru Emet, Jewish adherents of Judaism do not consider the New Testament to be their
sacred scripture, do not believe that Jesus was either Messiah or God, do not believe in a Trinitarian God, and do not believe that Christianity either supersedes or fulfills Judaism.
Panikkar's theology is highly marked
by his biography which laid the encounter of different religions and contexts in his cradle, as it were.40 He has faced this challenge and engaged in an intense study of languages, philosophies, theologies and
sacred scriptures as well as living everyday life in many contexts.
For example, in the fourth book of Father Paul Sarpi's History of the Council of Trent, you will find that in the year 1551 the Papal legates who presided over the Council ordered: «That the Divines ought to confirm their opinions with the holy
Scripture, Traditions of the Apostles,
sacred and approved Councils, and
by the Constitutions and Authorities of the holy Fathers; that they ought to use brevity, and avoid superfluous and unprofitable questions, and perverse contentions....
If
Sacred Scripture is the soul of theology, then there must be continuity between Leo's deliberations guided
by the Holy Spirit and the
sacred text itself.
This faithfulness stems from the church hearing anew the old time gospel of Jesus Christ in the
sacred scriptures, tempered
by the communal hearing of that Word, which is its collective memory.
Certainly she had materials of the sort that compose
sacred scriptures in other faiths, and certainly she had a priesthood who might have been thought of as interested in crystallizing Egypt's religion
by means of a preferred set of
sacred books.
It is evident that Smith's theology is «natural theology», a knowledge of God arrived at
by the study of nature alone, without any reliance on «revelation» as recorded in
sacred scripture.
Tradition is subordinate to
Scripture, and should be shaped
by Scripture, but
Scripture, on the other hand, must be read in the context of «a vibrant and ongoing interpretative tradition that serves to provide authoritative parameters for expositing [the]
sacred Scriptures.»
I believe that
by looking at what the authors of
Scripture say about
Scripture, we can arrive a much better position — one where we maintain the accuracy and authority of
Scripture, but in such a way that
Scripture is not set up as a
sacred idol.
Paul Schubert, in a symposium devoted to the The Idea of History in the Ancient Near East writes: «When it comes to the idea of history, it must be said that Israel, through its
sacred scripture... has proved to be the strongest and most influential single force observable
by the historian in shaping the idea of history throughout two millennia of Western history.»
As with
sacred Scripture, so with the exercise of the Petrine ministry: the truth or otherwise of a teaching is based on the authority invested in it — in both cases,
by God himself, guaranteed
by his Holy Spirit — rather than on the identity, oftentimes unknown, of this or that composer (or composers) of a particular text.
That is the kind of productive license writers can take with
sacred stories, the kind of story Tóibín could have told, when the storytelling effort is born of a freedom ordered — and indeed enlivened
by the challenge of being ordered — to the realities of tradition,
Scripture, teaching, and belief.
At the same time, it is to be borne in mind that «[since] everything asserted
by the inspired authors or
sacred writers must be held to be asserted
by the Holy Spirit, it follows that the books of
Scripture must be acknowledged as teaching solidly, faithfully and without error that truth which God wanted put into
sacred writings for the sake of salvation» (DV, 11).
Compelling references continue through the millennia in numerous esoteric texts: the
sacred B'on treaties, manuscripts of the Kalki lore, the Puranas, the earliest texts of the Kalachakra Laghutantra, in the even older Kalachakra Mulatantra, and in the ancient wisdom traditions of civilizations throughout the Himalayan regions of Asia and beyond.The Zhang Zhung and Tibetan
scriptures refer to the mysterious world as Shambhala I lam - yig, B'on treaties as Olmolungring, Hindu histories as Aryavarth, Chinese as Hsi Tien, and Russian traditions as Belovoyde.In an esoteric treatise composed in the early 1500s
by Ensapa Lobsang Döndrup, the Third Panchen Lama describes his remarkable visit to a land of wise masters hidden deep in the Himalayas.