This adds to the nearly $ 10 million in state electoral spending
by school choice proponents between 2003 and 2012, as tallied by the nonpartisan Wisconsin Democracy Campaign.
Not exact matches
The prediction comes from both
proponents and opponents of the tuition - voucher measure, which,
by providing parents with $ 900 for each student enrolled in a private or out - of - district public
school, would be the most extensive
choice program yet adopted
by any state.
School choice proponents who seek to prove that vouchers, tax credits and scholarships «work»
by citing test - score - based research have allowed themselves to be lured into argument that can never be completely won.
Adoption of a statewide
choice plan in California, with its 4.6 million public -
school students, would be
by far the most significant victory yet for
proponents of allowing parents to select their children's public
schools.
As we continue to study
choice - based policies in K — 12 education, one challenge we must confront is the push - pull created
by high - stakes accountability measures designed to assess
schools, students, and educators, based solely on test scores — an area where
choice proponents and opponents often find common ground.
Its summary, written
by Chester Finn and Amber Winkler, tells us that «many
proponents of private
school choice... take [this] for granted,» citing two examples — one of them being the Cato Institute, whose Center for Educational Freedom I direct.
Proponents of the former ruled the education roost throughout the 19th century, but in the 20th century a child - centered doctrine, developed
by John Dewey in the gardens surrounding the University of Chicago's Laboratory
School, then refined at Columbia University's Teachers College, gained the high ground, as «inquiry - based» and «problem - solving» became the pedagogies of choice, certainly as propounded by education - school profe
School, then refined at Columbia University's Teachers College, gained the high ground, as «inquiry - based» and «problem - solving» became the pedagogies of
choice, certainly as propounded
by education -
school profe
school professors.
To the Editor: I am always intrigued
by proponents of a «free market» approach to reforming education, as delineated in the Commentary
by Karl Borden and Edward A. Rauchut («
Choice: Making Even Good
Schools Better,» April 17, 1996).
Ball points to out - of - state
school choice proponent Public School Options as an instigator in a campaign to advocate the state's controversial online charter school, operated by private for - profit company K12 Inc., that's been «troubled by high dropout rates and flagging academic numbers in its first two years of operation.&
school choice proponent Public
School Options as an instigator in a campaign to advocate the state's controversial online charter school, operated by private for - profit company K12 Inc., that's been «troubled by high dropout rates and flagging academic numbers in its first two years of operation.&
School Options as an instigator in a campaign to advocate the state's controversial online charter
school, operated by private for - profit company K12 Inc., that's been «troubled by high dropout rates and flagging academic numbers in its first two years of operation.&
school, operated
by private for - profit company K12 Inc., that's been «troubled
by high dropout rates and flagging academic numbers in its first two years of operation.»
You pollute the term «
school choice»
by including privatization and vouchers, when you should know that in California,
proponents of vouchers are NOT included in the push for reform or
choice and the in California all CHarter
Schools are public s
Schools are public
schoolsschools.
Speaking in Indianapolis before a friendly audience of
school voucher
proponents, she instead laid out a moral case to dramatically transform American education — and improve young people's prospects —
by expanding
school choice.
In June, a third voucher study was released
by the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, a conservative think tank and
proponent of
school choice.
While there are clear exceptions to the generalizations I will make in this analysis, I have chosen to focus on charter
schools that exemplify a trend of exclusion that compromises the ideals of the
school choice system as a whole, demonstrating how the model fails to measure up to the paragon of student and parent autonomy lauded
by choice proponents.