Sentences with phrase «by side issues»

As they attempt to make the transition to standards - based grading, many schools go off track or get swamped by side issues, writes Brookhart.

Not exact matches

Salt Lake City, Utah - based Nikola claims it was issued six design patents by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office between February and April 2018 for its wrap windshield, mid-entry door, fuselage, fender, side cladding and the overall design of the Nikola One.

Since I tend to be on the quiet, introverted side, and knowing that networking is a requirement for small business success, I committed myself mentally to overcoming this issue by attending at least one networking activity every day for the first year.

By making this change for all new directors, it side - steps the issue of those already on the board, making it easier to implement on a go forward basis.

By stonewalling from the get - go, the news of transgressions became «the latest on the Tiger cover - up» instead of just a side — and personal — issue.

How the Liberals are navigating the two sides in the debate is laid out in more than 150 pages of documents obtained by The Canadian Press under the access to information law that outline how the issue is complicated by existing human rights decisions, the requirement to accommodate workers whose addictions constitute a disability, workers» privacy rights and actually proving impairment, particularly from cannabis.

On the flip side, a separate study by the GT Nexus, a supply chain platform, found that 75 percent of U.S. adults have come across an unavailable product in stores over the past year, with 63 percent encountering that issue online.

Following a controversial New York Times editorial by former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens Tuesday calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment, we asked readers to respond, offering not only the news of Stevens» stance, but also a Chicago Tribune editorial taking the other side of the issue.

The deal will also establish a side agreement between the United States and South Korea that is intended to deter «competitive devaluation» of both countries» currencies — which can artificially lower the cost of imports bought by consumers — and to create more transparency on issues of monetary policy.

«It is driven by the appetite of founders on one side to bypass the traditional fundraising process with VCs and also avoid dilution, and on the other hand, by a lot of new investors looking to invest in new startups via a mechanism (issuing tokens) that has liquidity and using crypto.

And by pinning his departure on his government's repudiation of transparency and accountability, Rathgeber has diagnosed the body politic and put himself on the right side of an issue at precisely the right time.

As more business leaders take a stand on fraught political issues, some find they pay a price by angering consumers on the other side.

«We recommend that foreign companies don't allow themselves to be an instrument of issues that surpass their limits and strength, by trusting the Greek Cypriot side,» Erdogan said.

The run was on wholesale money - that is, on repo and on unsecured commercial paper that had been issued in the hundreds of billions by financial institutions loaded down with securitized toxic garbage, including a lot of in - process inventory, on the asset side of their balance sheets.

I know that HCP is potentially going through a rough patch these days with tenant issues and questionable billing practices and being investigated by the DOJ however, I am reminded that many companies go through rough patches and usually come out smelling like roses on the other side.

Even when they had the White House (George W) and both Houses of Congress the GOP never even introduced, much less voted on, any bill banning abortion, allowing prayer in school, banning gay marriage or any other of the wedge issues they use to attract a certain mentally deranged segment of the population to their side by pretending to defend those things that are important to Christian conservatives.

Even on abortion, that most contentious issue, the pro-choice side generally holds to an idea of the good the pro-life people will recognize, while condemning the method by which it is to be achieved.

In the midst of giving generally good advice to conservative pro-lifers about how to play to their political strength — by emphasizing the issue of late - term abortion, where a consensus of public opinion is on their side — Krauthammer offered this:

As for the Palestinian issue - there is a real chasm between the 2 sides that unfortunately can't be solved just by being kind (although that would be a good start).

And maybe that's enough to keep them moving forward until the background issues (the truly private issues) are themselves resolved, before it becomes public separation and public proclamation (by both sides).

In today's divided moral landscape, with thoughtful, well - meaning people on both sides of every issue, there's no better way to show that you're a serious thinker than by acknowledging that every controversial issue is «complex.»

Despite how it is being painted by some, opposition to the first executive order was not a partisan issue, with leaders on both sides of the spectrum speaking out against it.

We now quite often find ourselves on the same side on an issue, and have been «both» attacked by others for seeing things the same way, yes...?

This is not a simple issue that is solved by playing both sides of the fence (pun unintended).

I think one thing missing today by people on all political sides is the ability and willingness to sit down with each other and have long conversations about deep issues.

Unless it is regulated by governments so as to insure that all people have access to all sides of issues, democracy as we know it becomes impossible.

Whenever someone publicizes their personal opinion about the hot - button issues of our day, it's instantly met by a dozen rebuttals or counterarguments from people on the opposite side of the issue.

I am encouraged by his acceptance of a substantial part of my criticism of classical theism as found in Aquinas; however, he sides with Aquinas and against me on some issues.

I would recommend «Christ Minimized,» by John Zens which addresses both sides of the issue much clearer and with more carefully detailed exegesis (and accurate facts).

While exerting one's autonomy and taking of innocent life in abortion is clearly wrong and disallowed by Scripture, so is being vitriolic and hating others on the other side of an issue.

The Democrats» present failure stems from their presumption that on economic issues they win by default, that non-wealthy voters know their own material interests» those historically opposed or left unaddressed by Republicans» and do not require instruction or reminding as to which party is on their side.

If the pro-life side truly wins a basic point, for example, by persuading people of the dignity of every human person» then that principle will begin to inform other life issues.

After all, if all these smarter - than - me theologians, theorists, academics, scholars, thinkers, and leaders on both sides of the issue haven't been able to put the debate to rest, what chance does a slim yellow book by a happy - clappy Canadian mama - writer have?

The bestselling author said she still loves the readers «who are angry or shocked or confused» by her news, and reminded followers on both sides of the issue that the LGBT community is paying attention to their response.

By casting the issues in the absolute terms of constitutionally protected rights, such litigation encourages a hardening of positions on both sides.

Meanwhile what really separates the two sides is the «moral» issues, especially abortion, that have been raised by politicized religious conservatives.

«By that standard,» he concludes, «I realized there was no «safe side» on this issue.

As you know, there were a number of intrinsic political issues in play during this period: the tariff, oft overlooked by the politically correct in the continuing effort to locate Southern apologists on the side of pro-slavery, the compact theory, and Nullification, an issue that is again in the public square.

That would be ridiculous, of course, but perhaps no more so than the demands issued by some on the religious side of the table.»

By then I had processed what I felt about myself, worked through the issues and come out the other side.

Thomas Reese was removed as editor of America by his Jesuit superiors - perhaps at the prompting of Cardinal Ratzinger — because under his editorship it was no longer clear that the magazine was on the Church's side of many controverted issues.

Instead of working to achieve consensus on contested theological and moral issues, legislatively driven agendas are designed to end debates by reducing the issue to two sides and then enacting one side into church policy and ecclesiastical law.

So when we debate an «issue» and forget that it is backed by people — imperfect, wounded, beloved people on both sides — we dehumanize each other.

Although Lincoln is often praised for this remark by those who oppose the mixing of religion and politics, it contains three of the most controversial ideas in American politics: that it is legitimate to invoke the name of God within the realm of political discourse; that God's existence isn't merely symbolic, but that he is always right; and that since God takes sides on certain issues, some people will be divinely justified while others will stand in opposition not only to their political opponents but to the very Creator and Sustainer of the Universe.

When those who have won the day on this issue (and by «the day» I mean every denominational vote on the issue since 1972) and are gaining more and more power in the denomination offer the possibility of a just separation, why do those who claim to be on the side of the oppressed want to maintain the oppressive status quo?

miscrraige is not (unless it is brought on by violence from another person (ie one who hits the woman in the womb area causing injury to the baby) to bring in miscarriage shows lame attempts to side track the issue

Appreciate the article for what it is, criticism is reasonable, but arrogance isn't going to win your argument when you belittle the other side because (1) the issue (in this case, Christianity) has been argued for centuries and isn't going to be settled by your argument here, and (2) the more arrogant you are, the worse your ideas look.

Though younger voters skew progressive on other social issues they continue to side with life; by some measures, more so than their parents.

The dilemma of affirming a powerful God who is also a God of love can not be resolved by starting on the power side of the issue.

I can't tell you have I've been hurt by those in higher learning institutions who, instead of coming along side you and discussing issues, only respond with anger, and a rude defensive tone.