Sentences with phrase «by sloppy science»

=============================================== Sea level rise grossly overstated by sloppy science By Frank Bosse and Prof. Fritz Vahrenholt (Text translated / edited by P. Gosselin) In mid February a frightening report made the rounds through the -LSB-...]

What has been proven is the human capacity to allow simple - minded passion to politicize power structures into misleading masses of people towards political agendas supported and well hidden by sloppy science.

Not exact matches

Science is plagued by bias, sloppy methods and dodgy statistics.

Much fear of science is engendered by the sloppy, arm - waving, button - pushing alarmism that results when commentators garble all research with horrors like MK - Ultra.

As to the «scientific consensus», Mann and his hockey stick have been called «scanty», «sloppy», «sh*tty», «rubbish», «a disgrace to the profession», «dubious», «invalidated» and «just bad science» by his fellow scientists, including the climatologist who came up with the term «global warming» back in the Seventies.

If your basic claim is «the highest quality scientific evidence we have says we must take X action'then you have to throw anyone on your side that does «sloppy work» or makes statements that are only «weakly» supported by «the highest quality science» under the bus.

-- Muller believes humans are changing climate with CO2 emissions — humans have been responsible for «most» of a 0.4 C warming since 1957, almost none of the warming before then — IPCC is in trouble due to sloppy science, exaggerated predictions; chairman will have to resign — the «Climategate» mails were not «hacked» — they were «leaked» by an insider — due to «hide the decline» deception, Muller will not read any future papers by Michael Mann — there has been no increase in hurricanes or tornadoes due to global warming — automobiles are insignificant in overall picture — China is the major CO2 producer, considerably more than USA today — # 1 priority for China is growth of economy — global warming is not considered important — China CO2 efficiency (GDP per ton CO2) is around one - fourth of USA today, has much room for improvement — China growth will make per capita CO2 emissions at same level as USA today by year 2040 — if it is «not profitable» it is «not sustainable» — US energy future depends on shale gas for automobiles; hydrogen will not be a factor — nor will electric cars, due to high cost — Muller is upbeat on nuclear (this was recorded pre-Fukushima)-- there has been no warming in the USA — Muller was not convinced of Hansen's GISS temperature record; hopes BEST will provide a better record.

===================================== By Ed Caryl This is a follow - up to the article AWI's Sloppy Antarctic Peninsula Science... Overlooked GISS Temperature Data, Snowfall Amounts.

One possible candidate would be not just the use of terms like «settled science,» but the use of goofy definitions of those terms followed by doing a sloppy job in applying those definitions, e.g., sloppiness in nose - counting when applying a goofy nose - counting definition of settled science.