Sentences with phrase «by the biology of»

Muller, a native of Munich who grew up in Germany and France, had his curiosity captured by the biology of aging when he was 12.

Curricular enhancements in early childhood education that are guided by the science of learning must be augmented by protective interventions informed by the biology of adversity.

On the other side of it, understanding how the brain functions as a computing device will help inform our engineering of computers that are inspired by the biology of brain - circuit architecture.

The intervention models that have been generated in the past year — and are currently in various stages of development, implementation, and testing — are based on approaches that have been heavily influenced by the biology of adversity.

Which effect is dominant has to be determined by the biology of BCPs.

Not exact matches

That was the eye - opening opening of a keynote address given yesterday by the brilliant John Quackenbush, a professor of biostatistics and computational biology at Dana - Farber Cancer Institute who has a dual professorship at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and ample other academic credits after his name.

A former health care investment analyst with a degree in biology from Yale University and current CEO of the company, Wojcicki is fascinated by the mysteries of the genome and what it can reveal about the human body.

Take for example, the observation by futurist Ray Kurzweil that technology is the evolution of human biology.

His public remarks at a coding event aimed at girls, first reported by The Verge, come after a week of controversy sparked by an internal memo written by a Google employee criticising the Californian tech company's diversity policy and arguing biology may be behind the gender divide in tech.

This approach begins by using tools like advanced human genetics to unravel the complexities of disease and understand the fundamentals of human biology.

He earned degrees in cell biology and tissue engineering and eventually got a job in a lab run by Vladimir Mironov, who was investigating the use of bioprinting — 3 - D printing using living cells — to generate replacement organs.

SETTING THE AGENDA: THE CONVERGENCE OF BIG DATA AND BIOLOGY With co-chairs Dr. David B. Agus of USC and Clifton Leaf of Fortune — Report by Erika Fry — Video: Disruption Isn't Coming Fast Enough to Health CaOF BIG DATA AND BIOLOGY With co-chairs Dr. David B. Agus of USC and Clifton Leaf of Fortune — Report by Erika Fry — Video: Disruption Isn't Coming Fast Enough to Health Caof USC and Clifton Leaf of Fortune — Report by Erika Fry — Video: Disruption Isn't Coming Fast Enough to Health Caof Fortune — Report by Erika Fry — Video: Disruption Isn't Coming Fast Enough to Health Care

Lie4Him, Schweitzer, one of the first scientists to use the tools of modern cell biology to study dinosaurs, has upended the conventional wisdom by showing that some rock - hard fossils tens of millions of years old may have remnants of soft tissues hidden away in their interiors.

By the way I have 24 units of graduate and undergraduate biology.

I can even say that libertarianism should be chastened a bit by the semi-true discoveries of evolutionary biology, although the progressives misunderstood what those discoveries really are.

By the way, from the look of your dialogues, you seemed to be quite knowledgeable about human biology.

md2205 The basics of evolutionary biology are easy to find, as these others have indicated, but you really do have to get educated by actual scientists, it seems.

The concept that a god or gods had a hand in the development of the universe and life can not be disproven, but creationism, the literal interpretation of Genesis, can be and has been disproven by geology, astrophysics, biology, etc..

You are exactly right, the process of death is not defined by biology alone, as any real nurse who has decades of caring for the terminally ill konws.

How do spiritual realities, such as the soul, fit into the world of matter described by physics, chemistry, and biology?

The controversy will not be over the facts but over whether Behe has gone «outside of science» by attributing irreducible complexity in biology to «design» rather than to some undiscovered material (i.e., mindless) mechanism.

The technical error at the heart of my analysis of neo-Darwinism, says Barr, is my misunderstanding of how the term «random» as used by Darwinian biology.

A degree of kinship between human beings and the rest of physical creation has always been clear to an extent, but the depth and detail of our interrelationship with the rest of life on the planet is being confirmed over and over again in breathtaking detail by new scientific advances such as genetic studies and molecular biology.

Nearly every scientific society, representing hundreds of thousands of scientists, have issued statements rejecting intelligent design and a peti.tion supporting the teaching of evolutionary biology was endorsed by 72 US Nobel Prize winners.

Religion and the Social SciencesConversations with Robert Bellah and Christian Smithedited by R. R. Reno and Barbara McClayMore often than not it's a class in the social science that challenges the faith of students, not a class in biology.

In the United States, the following Universities have extensive evolutionary biology departments staffed by thousands of the most gifted biologists in the World; Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Colombia, Duke, the Massachusetts Insti.tute of Technology, Brown, Stanford, Berkley, and the University of Chicago.

In Australia and Asia, the following universities and colleges have extensive evolutionary biology departments manned by more of the most gifted biological scientists in the World; Monash University in Melbourne, The University of New South Wales, Kyoto University in Ja.pan, Peking University in China, Seoul University in Korea, the University of Singapore, National Taiwan University, The Australian National University, The University of Melbourne, and the University of Sydney.

Collins coins his own term for this idea: «BioLogos», a clumsy term, perhaps, but intended to express the harmony between the biology and the idea of Creation by the Word of God.

Similarities of development, part of, or parallel to the processes discovered in biology, are now recognised in all branches of empirical science, and have justifiably resulted in the universal acceptance by the intelligentsia of all countries of evolutionary philosophies of matter and of the nature of living beings.

Our entire discussion of this point may be focused on the question of the logic of the contention that biology and, by extension, neurophysiology are reducible to physics and chemistry.

The possibility that any such mechanism can exist has now been virtually ruled Out by the findings of molecular biology.

When theology faces off against the account of the world set forth by evolutionary biology, God's goodness and power and God's plans for the future seem to be called into question with new force.

I am suggesting that perhaps the same sort of single - level approach is being taken today by those who reduce the science of life to molecular biology.

Scientific reductionism, however, wants to reduce biology to physics and chemistry, to explain the properties of «life», by thorough specification of the particulars (atoms and molecules) that are integrated into cells and organisms.

These roles and relations are not fundamentally natural phenomena integral to human identity and social welfare but are mere accidents of biology overlaid with social conventions that can be replaced by functionally equivalent roles without loss.

Very few of the Catholic universities (with the exceptions of Notre Dame and Georgetown) are considered on the vanguard of any cutting edge research by leaders in the field, whether in biology, physics or astronomy.

In the field of biology, evolution may be «just» a theory (as some politicians painfully point out), but it is the theory subscribed to, for good reason, by every real scientist in every established university in the Western world.

Whereas the dichotomy of subject and object has been challenged by experiments in modern physics, a Cartesian dualism still provides the philosophical background of modern molecular biology and, more recently, sociobiology.

Scientific discoveries in physics or biology do not disprove the existence of God, but in my view do just the opposite by uncovering some of awe inspiring complexities of this universe that could only have come about through a creator.

By using the language of chemistry modern biology has also given us an updated version of Darwin's theory of evolution.

Richard Dawkins, in his celebrated book, The Selfish Gene, exemplifies the same position.3 And a similar reduction of biology to a molecular science may be found in the writings of E.O. Wilson, Ernst Mayr, Jacques Monod and numerous other highly respected scientific writers.4 In Chance and Necessity, for example, Monod gives one of the most forceful renditions of the view that biochemical analysis is «obviously» the sole avenue to understanding the secret of life.5 Decades ago Jacques Loeb had already set forth the program of inquiry still emulated today by many biologists:

Though I think the issues raised by biology and medicine are important; I fear that this area may receive more than its share of attention because of the resources it can command.

From Whitehead» s vision of reality as informing and informed by insights from biology, Birch and Cobb develop a distinctively «process» environmental ethic.

«Evolution, a foundational principle of modern biology, is supported by overwhelming scientific evidence and is accepted by the vast majority of scientists.

Were any of these people alive today and involved in molecular biology in addition to physics, they would be amazed at the facts we have managed to gather about the world and probably independently come to the conclusion of evolution by natural selection.

Are we the sum total of our biology and environment or are we capable of being influenced by forces outside the boundary of personal consciousness and physical connection?

How life first began is irrelevant, the first cell could have been placed by your god, and evolutionary biology, that is, the explanation for the diversity of life on earth, would be unchanged.

The hard sciences of physics and chemistry and biology are twisted into grotesque propaganda machines fueled by corrupted versions of sociology and psychology, where science itself dies alongside genuine inquiry and clarity of thought, as man is assimilated into a faceless colony of manageable data points.

If a YEC can not understand how their beliefs are contradicted by evidence from really any field of science, from physics to geology to biology, then I have doubts about their abilities to be talented engineers.

And Whitehead says that he does not think it is inevitable that the human mind spatializes, though it often does this, and when it does, one way or another, whether through partiality or something else, it deforms the object of knowledge and of experience... [But] Bergson believed that, at least to some significant degree, the spatializing tendencies of the human intellect and of human intelligence, can be overcome by a biology and a physics that is less mechanistic.