The K - index is the ratio of the scientist's actual follower number to the follower number «warranted»
by the citation count.
Not exact matches
We have compiled a list of the 50 most followed scientists on the social media platform and their academic
citation counts — and calculated their K - index
by drawing on
citation data from Google Scholar (A fuller explanation of how we compiled the list is below, at the end of the full story).
M: If you look just at who is the world's leader
by sheer volume, the United States of course is the leader, whether you're
counting papers,
citations, anything.
This led him to speculate that if academic careers were less linear, defined less
by narrow metrics such as
citation counts and grants and more
by wider societal benefits such as outreach activities and teaching quality, «there would be more diversity and thus innovation in the system.»
The paper was co-authored
by Nobel Prize — winner Stanley Prusiner, he notes, which may have boosted its
citation count to its current number of 103.
Weighted RCR is essentially defining an average paper's scientific impact based on actual
citations as 1 (normalized
by research field), and a given scientist's output can be compared against the average
by adding together the
citation count for that scientist's papers to give the Weighted RCR over a given period of time).
As far as critiquing peer reviewed work goes, if the work is really no good, does it deserve to have an inflated
citation count by attracting a flood of peer reviewed rebuttals?
c.) Evaluate the influence of MBH98
by count of cites of cites, general reputation of authors who cite, number of cites of said authors» other works, diversity of cites, discounting self -
citation, non-peer-reviewed cites of lesser merit, cites that discredit the original, etc..
Not being academic, I haven't published so much, but I am easy to find in Google Scholar, and some of those papers were rather more influential than indicated
by moderate
citation counts.
As the authors note,
citation counts are often used
by university departments to make decisions about hiring and tenure.
It seems to me that CanLII ought to be able to entail good alternative
citations into its
count of cases that cite X, including Quicklaw
citations; and I suspect that with a bit of work it should be able to catch the messed up neutral
citations, perhaps
by running a double - check against the case names.
The majority of the Supreme Court held there was an apprehension of bias, but it is the test set out in the dissent
by Justice de Grandpré that has placed the decision in the top 100 cited cases — over 1,480
citations and
counting:
Even if you are unable to dismiss traffic
citations in this manner, you can still complete a traffic school program for purposes of reducing your total point
count by three points.