Some statements made to the press about climate and hurricanes were made
by climatologists who lacked expertise in the conditions generating these great storms.
So although the number of northerly stations was cut in the 80s / 90s, it doesn't introduce a warm bias, because of the way the averaging of stations is done
by the climatologists who do actually know about these things.
Not exact matches
So
who's going to sponsor a full - page ad stating the mainstream scientific position / correcting those misleading statements, signed
by hundreds of ACTUAL
CLIMATOLOGISTS?
As an outside observer, it seems that climate science is marked
by scientists not only debating data, but credentials:
who is a real
climatologist and
who is not.
A Dot Earth reader from England and Joe Romm have recalled that last year Fox News ran a breathless «exclusive» about the National Science Foundation unleashing its Inspector General to investigate potential impropriety
by Michael Mann, the Pennsylvania State University
climatologist who for years has been a target of foes of restricting greenhouse gases.
Michael Mann, the
climatologist from Pennsylvania State University
who has been under attack
by foes of restrictions on greenhouse gases and critics of the dominant view that human - driven warming is occurring and dangerous, has been cleared on three points of inquiry
by a faculty review panel at the university, John Broder of The Times reports.
A clear focus is the research center run
by the agency's star
climatologist, James E. Hansen,
who has variously been hailed and attacked for becoming a prominent campaigner against coal and oil use.
The paper was was written
by 17 prominent climate, ice and ocean scientists, led
by James E. Hansen, the pioneering
climatologist who since 2007 has argued that most of his peers have been too reticent in their projections of the possible pace of sea - level rise in a warming world.
The issue kind of crept up
by surprise, perhaps because it has mainly been
climatologists, not oceanographers and chemists,
who have focused on impacts of greenhouse gases.
The essay is
by Myles Allen, an Oxford University
climatologist who was a leader of research developing a carbon budget as a way to gauge global warming solutions and has since 2013 pressed for intensified work on capturing CO2.
The National Science Foundation has found no evidence of research misconduct
by Michael Mann, the Pennsylvania State University
climatologist who has faced waves of attacks from foes of action to curb greenhouse gases.
For specific applications of non-centered PCA to climate data, consider this presentation provided
by statistical
climatologist Ian Jolliffe
who specializes in applications of PCA in the atmospheric sciences, having written a widely used text book on PCA.
And those
who say that the existing scientific method has sufficient checks and balances to find any bad stuff already might care to ponder why all those three — afaik the only three in the history of climatology — were found
by «citizen scientists» not
by fellow
climatologists.
As to the «scientific consensus», Mann and his hockey stick have been called «scanty», «sloppy», «sh*tty», «rubbish», «a disgrace to the profession», «dubious», «invalidated» and «just bad science»
by his fellow scientists, including the
climatologist who came up with the term «global warming» back in the Seventies.
The CEI - funded
by Exxon Mobil - unleash a torrent of press releases uncovering «flaws» in the work of
climatologists who believe in climate change.
The Niskanen Center, which calls itself a libertarian think tank, has a Center for Climate Science directed
by Dr. Joseph Majkut, a
climatologist who previously served on the staff of Brulle's ally Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse.52 The think tank R Street is so well known for its friendliness to a carbon tax that when we published a study critical of the carbon tax, we invited it to contribute a defense of the tax.53 And as the present study goes to press, prominent Republicans at the Hoover Institution like George Schultz and James Baker are advocating vigorously for a carbon tax.54
Johnson also demonstrates that Ball claimed at one point that he was the first
climatologist in Canada, a claim that Johnson demonstrated to be false both
by demonstrating that Ball was not a
climatologist, but also
by listing a small but significant number of Canadian
climatologists who got their degrees in actual climatology before Ball got his degree in 1983.
As may Anthony Watts,
who's being called a
Climatologist by many (I think he may deny this), and Ross McKitrick, the Climate Economist (oh, wait, he's Canadian, too), and John Christy of UAH, and Roy Spencer.
Basically the
climatologists who have produced hockey stick shaped graphs have done so
by carefully selecting proxies that produce the results they want.
It can be said with great confidence that the vast majority of papers from which the IPCC concocts its pulp fictions, are written
by people
who not only have no degree in «climatology» but are infinitely less qualified than Lindzen to be called «
climatologists».
In recent discussion of the Weblog 2007 Awards, several commenters at other blogs have argued that our criticisms of the Mannian parlor tricks have been «thoroughly refuted and discarded
by climatologists, published in a credible journal»; that «other professionals in the field
who also have «looked in great detail at the problem at hand» and have come to the conclusion that rather than McIntyre's findings being «valid and relevant», they instead have found them to be «without statistical and climatological merit»; that CA «fluffed on the whole hockey stick thing».
But when he proposes links between his own historical field and that of climate science he drops all scholarly standards and quotes any old conference paper or telephone conversation he feels like; mad activists and conspiracy theorists like Oreskes and Powell; or Mark Maslin, a professor - cum - company director
who combines his job at my old university as palaeontologist or geographer or
climatologist (all descriptions of his expertise taken from «the Conversation») with that of director of Rezatec Ltd, a company set up
by the Royal Society as a «Leading provider of data - as - a-service geospatial data analytics» to serve those
who may be worried to death
by forecasts of eco-doom to be found in the books and articles of Mark Maslin.
Der Spiegel online called the supposed global warming pause an «Inconvenient Truth for
climatologists» — an allusion to the climate change movie made
by former U.S. vice president Al Gore,
who in 2007 shared the Nobel Peace Prize with the IPCC for his work on the issue.
This is why we get all these conspiracy theories
by what appears to be liberal arts students and
climatologists who don't know much about electrical engineering.
But this claim is discredited
by University of Washington
climatologist Cliff Mass,
who after examining precipitation levels in the Gulf found that «[t] here is no evidence that global warming is influencing Texas coastal precipitation in the long term and little evidence that warmer than normal temperatures had any real impact on the precipitation intensity from this storm.»
CFACT Senior Policy Analyst Paul Driessen, with
climatologist David Legates, asks those
who claim that «we are still in» the Paris climate accord pay their equal share of the U.S. payment mandated
by the Paris accords?
«Climate Science» is a field invented
by and for CAGW believers
who either choose not to call themselves meteor - /
climatologists, because that's not where the grant money is, or
who in addition may not do so because they are in fact neither.
It's the latter detail which has led former Virginia State
Climatologist Pat Michaels — one of the skeptics
who might have been affected
by Shukla's proposed RICO prosecutions — to describe this as «the largest science scandal in US history.»
That's not dramatic; it's a likely outcome, according to Rahman and many other
climatologists,
who predict that at least 17 percent of Bangladesh will be submerged
by 2100 (assuming a likely three - foot sea level rise).
«Ninety - seven percent of scientists, including
by the way some
who originally disputed the data, have now acknowledged the planet is warming and human activity is contributing to it,» Obama said today, citing a recent study that confirmed — once again — that the vast majority of
climatologists accept climate science.
The reasons for that are many: the timid language of scientific probabilities, which the
climatologist James Hansen once called «scientific reticence» in a paper chastising scientists for editing their own observations so conscientiously that they failed to communicate how dire the threat really was; the fact that the country is dominated
by a group of technocrats
who believe any problem can be solved and an opposing culture that doesn't even see warming as a problem worth addressing; the way that climate denialism has made scientists even more cautious in offering speculative warnings; the simple speed of change and, also, its slowness, such that we are only seeing effects now of warming from decades past; our uncertainty about uncertainty, which the climate writer Naomi Oreskes in particular has suggested stops us from preparing as though anything worse than a median outcome were even possible; the way we assume climate change will hit hardest elsewhere, not everywhere; the smallness (two degrees) and largeness (1.8 trillion tons) and abstractness (400 parts per million) of the numbers; the discomfort of considering a problem that is very difficult, if not impossible, to solve; the altogether incomprehensible scale of that problem, which amounts to the prospect of our own annihilation; simple fear.
Some of those sites are Wattsupwiththat run
by an American «meteorologist» but probably more accurately a TV and radio weather presenter; Jonova run
by the Australian Joanne Nova
who has an Honours degree majoring in Microbiology and Molecular Biology from the University of Western Australia; ClimateAudit run
by Steve McIntyre a Canadian with a Bachelor's degree im Mathematics from the University of Toronto and a degree in politics, philosophy and economics from the Unversity of Oxford; Climate Etc run
by the American Dr. Judith Curry
who is a
climatologist with many peer reviewed publications in the field of climate science; Global Warming Policyh Foundation started
by the Englishman Nigel Lawson (aka Lord Lawson)
who was the Chancellor of the Exchequer in Mrs thatcher's government.
By T. Rees Shapiro Stephen H. Schneider, 65, an influential Stanford University
climatologist who parlayed his expertise on the dangerous effects of greenhouse - gas emissions into a second career as a leader in the public dialogue — and debate — on climate change, died July 19 in London.
However, there are many places where the State
Climatologist was simply appointed
by a university Department Chair, often someone
who managed to scare up the funding.
Mann et al are being «hounded» for two major reasons: fraudulent manipulation of data to produce «results» that would support political actions advocated
by fellow «progressives» and conspiring with other prominent progressive
climatologists and organizations to suppress conflicting data
by trashing, personally and professionally, and blackballing the scientists
who collected and attempted to disseminate it.
A statistician makes a claim that the mathematics being used
by a
climatologist are inaccurate, and the
climatologist cites another
climatologist (as an authority)
who backs up his claim, THIS is an appeal to authority fallacy.
In analyzing responses
by sub-groups, Doran found that
climatologists who are active in research showed the strongest consensus on the causes of global warming, with 97 percent agreeing humans play a role.
Serious question from a non-American:
Who in the Trump administration has sufficient expertise and the general honesty and competence to even assess studies that have already been done
by climatologists?
The new study potentially addresses one major criticism leveled
by scientists skeptical of any strong link between sea surface temperatures and hurricane strength, said Kerry Emanuel, a
climatologist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
who was not involved in the study.
And finally, approximately 97 % of
climatologists who actually study climate agree that global warming is real, and caused
by humans.