It should come as no surprise when the several questions are raised
by the commenters regarding accidents, finding encouragement, coping with fear of failure.
These changes should resolve the concerns raised
by commenters regarding conflicts with state laws that require consent, authorization, or other types of written legal permission for uses and disclosures of protected health information.
Not exact matches
Some of these
commenters and petitioners also asserted that individual retirement investors — those most impacted
by the Fiduciary Rule and PTEs — have not themselves focused on how investment products, related services, and costs may change and need more time to understand, process, and make decisions
regarding their accounts and services.
Regarding question 12, the bureau said today that «[g] iven the importance of this small population group to the economy, the federal statistical system and the nation, bolstered
by the new knowledge of historical precedent brought to light
by commenters to the Federal Register notice, the Census Bureau therefore plans to retain this question on the 2016 ACS.»
By contrast, the number of utterly ignorant bloggers, blog
commenters, hack journalists and so on who
regard themselves as being better qualified than the experts is just about beyond counting (though still, fortunately, a small minority of the population as a whole).
Most of the skeptical
commenters here have been poisoned and indoctrinated
by the garbage that people like The Chief and Tomas spew
regarding how to interpret chaotic fluctuations.
Other
commenters maintained that section 1179 of the Act means that the Act's privacy requirements do not apply to the request for, or the use or disclosure of, information
by a covered entity with respect to payment: (a) For transferring receivables; (b) for auditing; (c) in connection with --(i) a customer dispute; or (ii) an inquiry from or to a customer; (d) in a communication to a customer of the entity
regarding the customer's transactions payment card, account, check, or electronic funds transfer; (e) for reporting to consumer reporting agencies; or (f) for complying with: (i) a civil or criminal subpoena; or (ii) a federal or state law regulating the entity.
Another
commenter suggested that complaints
regarding noncompliance in
regard to psychotherapy notes should be made to a panel of mental health professionals designated
by the Secretary.
This
commenter urged that we clarify our intent
regarding the use of protected health information
by governmental entities.
Commenters stated that if a layperson within a covered entity makes an improper decision as to what the minimum necessary information is in
regard to a request
by the entity's attorney, the attorney may end up lacking information that is vital to representation.
While the
commenters noted areas in which clarification in the proposed disclosure requirements would facilitate compliance, the comments did not provide any information
regarding aspects of construction financing that would require different disclosures than are illustrated
by forms H - 24 (C) and (E).
Thus, the
commenter explained that its membership generally did not object to providing the integrated disclosures for all consumer - purpose loans secured
by real property, without
regard to property size.
Alternatively, that
commenter suggested that the rule permit creditors to rely on information
regarding homeowner's association assessments and other charges provided
by the buyer or seller when preparing the Loan Estimate.