Sentences with phrase «by the dogma of»

This approach is analogous to that of Web design, ruled by the dogma of separating form from content.

As she grows fond of her charge, Lib sees the girl as a damsel in distress, enchained by the dogma of those around her.

Not exact matches

Don't be trapped by dogma — which is living with the results of other people's thinking.

Don't be trapped by dogma, which is living with the results of other people's thinking.

«If (German Finance Minister Wolfgang) Schaueble's dogma for a multi-speed Europe and economic zones of low - cost labour is not abandoned, Europe will be brought to the brink of dissolution,» Tsipras was quoted by Realnews as saying.

Most economists - at least not those blinded by either dogma or an over-reliance on quarterly data - who made a fundamental analysis of the state of western economies, could not help but feel that the sense of escape from calamity was a bit premature.

However Christians demand that society accept the existence of their god as fact and validate their religious dogmas by incorporating them into civil law.

Go ahead and make a momument detailing ALL of God's dogmas as established by the Holy Bible... go ahead and bring out all the silly Christian skeletons in the closet:

Tired of being bugged by all that endless chatter, everyone is welcome, try us for thirty days, no dogma, no cash offerings required, no churches to attend (your local bar will do especially on Fridays), of course buyijng a T - shirt wouldn't kill you and would help spread HIS word.

A Hasidic Jew presents problems to any organization since they are bound by a higher set of religious dogma that might not agree with established governmental policies.

As a God - fearing soul - filled person, I see no reason to bargain with atheists or their idiotic vestiges of palpable dogma they spew forth by their desicrating religious faiths of abundant measures Teach your children well you parents of Atheistic dissention.

Others choose to do so without the assistance of ignorant religious dogma and I'd say it works even better than the misplaced focus encouraged by fear of not «believing» (in religious dogma).

The answer: by reference to the huge overlap of dogma and philosophy, wherein ideas can be assessed logically and empirically.

That was in the context of suggesting that we conservatives or we Republicans are having our clocks cleaned these days by Obama's progressive dogma because we don't have an adequate counter-dogma.

I'm sure I'm not using the right wording but it is easy to say something is outdated dogma by only looking at the last line of a book that has been in process for 2,000 years (i.e. 9 times older than the government trying to tell it what to do).

The ethics and compassion and example that Christ lived by and was killed for, or do you believe more in the dogma, and doctrines of your «faith»?

At another level, I'm fascinated by the phenomenal success of an overtly moralistic movement in a time dominated by the dogma that you must not impose your morality on others.

Indeed I think that every Christian sect gives a great handle to Atheism by their general dogma that, without a revelation, there would not be sufficient proof of the being of a god.

The error you are making is since your faith has all this extra stuff attached then if someone rejects your faith then all that stuff must somehow get replaced by some other type of dogma.

I think a combination of Christianity (micro: this life time) and Hinduism (Macro-scale) is the best for humankind as both religions, despite their dogmas and some imperfections, by and large are most tolerant.

The degrading of learning in the US is almost entirely due to vigorous efforts by christians to ram their belief systems into the school system and replace topics like science with non-thinking dogma.

We stand little chance of becoming as bigoted as yourself, so self - poisoned by dogma until you're only a shell of a human being.

Fundamentalism uses the culture, rituals, sacraments, texts, language, and metaphors and allusions and symbols (verbal, visual, musical, etc.) of religion in blind adherence to a dogma as defined and interpreted by a person or group who is self - aggregating and self - justifying raw personal power for the sole purpose of controlling the lives of others.

Pelikan summarized the Protestant way of putting the argument: «If the Holy Trinity was just as holy as the Trinitarian dogma taught, and if original sin was as virulent as the Augustinian tradition said it was, and if Christ was as necessary as the Christological dogma implied, then the only way to treat justification in a manner faithful to the Catholic tradition was to teach justification by faith.»

As a freethinker, I form my opinions on the basis of science, logic, and reason, and not by authority, tradition, or any dogma.

Instead of being ethno - centric, they will welcome anyone who is willing to supplicate themselves to the authority of the founder's representatives and / or the dogma laid out by the frequently suprahuman founder.

I hope one day there is a uprising of common sense that drowns out the dogma spewed by the Christian a & & Holes.

It's not that I disagree with you about keeping religion out of schools (public schools, ones not set up specifically by a religious community for their community and paid for by that community), but dogma is what you also both adhere to and propagate, so you might want to rephrase.

If that negation of human works (and by implication of all human structure and conduct) is what Christianity is, then morality, tradition, authority, the Church, sanctification, discipleship, liturgical order, and even dogma are secondary at best.

With Jesus Feminist, Bessey's a modern - day Moses, seeking to not only free a Church held captive by dogma but also to redeem generations of women who have been stifled and silenced far too long.»

The formulation of Revelation's content into statements is what we mean by a dogma.

His predominant theme is the rise of a liberal model of civilisation which he traces from Protestantism, with its «rejection of the normative significance of tradition in the field of Christian dogma» (p. 6), followed by the Enlightenment, which placed an absolute value on the individual.

«I pray for our sins of dogma (oh Lord)... seriously, I love and worship you (God of Creation), I give you praise and thanks (to the MOST HIGH)............ I refuse to diminish these statements by dogma.

«Dogma is a principle or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true.

Part of the world population started to change its opinion starting during 1997 - 1998 following the setback of the policies imposed jointly by governments applying neo-liberal dogmas, by the owners of national and foreign capital and by multilateral financial institutions.

With all due respect to the dogma of the dictionary, you're not in a position to insist that differing philosophies are, in fact, the same, merely because Webster doesn't distinguish them by name.

No, the majority of them have doctrine or dogma that calls for the punishment, usually by death, or all the non-believers.

(Editors» note: The October issue of First Things featured Phillip Johnson's essay, «Evolution as Dogma: The Establishment of Naturalism,» along with responses to the essay by William B. Provine, Gareth Nelson, Irving Kristol, Thomas H. Jukes, and Matthew Berke.

They were, however, more concerned with the emotional experience of salvation by a sudden conversion than they were with theological dogmas.

If your so - called «faith» is so strong and «protects» you from all of your perceived «dangers of evil», then WHY are you so afraid of people who have simply decided to live a life guided by REASON instead of a life guided by contrived dogma and ancient mythology?

Their instinct of faith should ask whether some new thesis of a theologian is still Christian and Catholic, whether it corresponds to the binding dogma proclaimed by the magisterium.

Indeed Jesus and Mary are predestined by God «in one and the same decree»; the phrase is used in both Ineffabilis Deus, defining the Immaculate Conception, and Munificentissimus Deus, defining the dogma of the Assumption.

The Christian must normally adopt an analogous attitude in theory and practice in regard to teachings and moral precepts of the Church which are put forward authoritatively by the Church, even if not as irrevocable dogma.

Only journalists very badly instructed in theology could therefore suppose that Vatican II might cancel the doctrine defined by Vatican I regarding the papal primacy of jurisdiction and teaching authority, or out of ecumenical spirit and desire to please, might revoke the dogma of the Immaculate Conception or the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary.

your understanding of the change process is very simplistic, because your mind is not open, you specifically believe already in the traditional doctrines, Dogmas as shown in thousands of years of history evolves, and the need for input variables, meaning the diversity of religious belief is necessay because nature through his will is requiring this to happen, we are being educated by God in the events of history.In the past when there was no humans yet Gods will is directly manifisted in nature, with our coming and education through history, we gradually takes the responsibilty of implementing the will.Your complaint on your perception of abuse is just part of the complex process of educating us through experience.

Spirituality is supposed to bring us together, but every organized religion on earth that is not openly mocked by the majority of people on earth has women can't do this and women shouldn't do that hardwired into the dogma and spelled out in sacred text.

When particular elements in the traditional teaching about the nature of things have been challenged by demonstrable scientific findings, the whole structure of religious dogma has been called into question.

Anyone who previously had unthinkingly understood the dogma of the primacy of the pope as meaning that the bishops were only subordinate, provincial papal officials, was given a fundamental lesson by Vatican II.

We can say that Whitehead sees his interpretation of the doctrine of God's being within the pattern of St. Augustine's «faith seeking understanding», provided by faith we do not understand the acceptance of dogma; but the religious intuition born out of the impact of Jesus upon the world.

But if that is done by the Church's magisterium, it can only be through propositions which are not themselves absolute dogma but serious and valid items of knowledge (in varying degrees, of course, and of very many different kinds), but knowledge which in principle is subject to revision and capable of improvement, and which can be deepened, clarified, given greater discrimination, improved in this or that respect, or even abandoned.