Not exact matches
4.2.7 Submit articles and excerpts from the Licensed Materials
when required
by law for use in
legal proceedings provided each article or excerpt from the Licensed Materials contains a credit line noting the original appearance of the article in its appropriate journal; provided the use is otherwise without modification to the original material; and provided such use does not present any material from the Licensed Materials in any manner that implies that
Publisher endorses Licensee or any of the Licensee's products or services;
Simon, don't you mean «marginal» rather than «paramount» in terms of use
by the
legal profession
when compared to the commercial
legal publishers competing services?
When I posted the opinion at the «How Appealing» blog, hosted
by American Lawyer Media, a respected
publisher of
legal news, there was no explanation publicly available anywhere or privately available to me for why the Second Circuit had withdrawn the opinion.
Answer: In the olden days
when people used law books made out of paper (before people started turning law books into art, and flooring and building columns),
legal publishers would update their books
by sending out a paper insert that you could stick in a pocket in the back of the book.
It didn't occur to
publishers that spend on
legal IT and
by practice support lawyers (PSLs) and partners direct could trump this digitised content if and
when it did arrive, let alone trump it quite comprehensively.
What will happen to a law library if and
when budget restraints make it impossible to absorb the costs of the online services provided
by the major commercial
legal publishers.
The word «comprehensive» came into use to describe incomplete databases in the strongest possible terms, creating the impression of completeness, while leaving an «out» for the
legal publisher when omissions were identified
by users.
The
legal publishers may be listening to Shawn Mendes
when he sings «we don't care what them people say... so don't let them keep you down...»cause we don't have the time to be sorry» (lyrics
by Ido Zmishlany, Scott Friedman).
As has worked in the past,
when the neutral citation system for Canadian courts was created and adopted, and equally a uniform naming convention for Canadian judgments, I would suggest the work be entrusted to a core working group supported
by an advisory board representative of all the affected communities: the Courts (and the Canadian Judicial Council), the law
publishers both print and digital (especially CanLII and Lexum),
legal writing and research faculty, law librarians and practising lawyers from both our French and English
legal communities.