The temperature climatologies were supplemented
by upper atmosphere temperature climatologies derived from the National Center for Environmental Prediction's North American Regional Reanalysis (Mesinger et al., 2006; emc.ncep.noaa.gov / mmb / rreanl /).
Not exact matches
Hmm, so you're telling me that a «heat shield» that was made of «special plastic» (as NASA called it back in the day), which was nothing but epoxy smeared over a ss honey comb «protected» the astros barreling into the
upper atmosphere at hypersonic 5 miles / sec, or well over 30 times the velocity of a jumbo - jet and thru
temperatures *** as quoted
by NASA *** that are «10 times hotter than the surface of the sun», and then they «braked» with only a parachute to a safe splashdown?
While the
temperatures will be cold and the lakes warm, the amount of snow will be limited
by the direction of the wind and relatively dry air in the
upper atmosphere.
In this respect, the phenomenon more closely resembles Earth's Arctic vortices — seasonal cyclones that appear above the poles and are driven
by temperature gradients in the
upper atmosphere.
To determine whether declining pollutants deserve credit for the recovery, the researchers used a 3D atmospheric model to separate the effects of the chemicals from those of weather, which can affect ozone loss through winds and
temperature, and volcanic eruptions, which deplete ozone
by pumping sulfate particles into the
upper atmosphere.
The energetic particles from the Sun also can be absorbed
by the
upper atmosphere, increasing its
temperature and causing it to swell up.»
AT sufficiently short wavelengths, the
temperature of the
upper atmosphere and near TOA would have to be a sizable fraction of the surface
temperature in order for the Planck function for higher levels to be a small fraction of the that at the surface (example: at 5 microns, relative to T = 250 K and the Planck function at 250 K, a 20 % reduction in
temperature reduces the Planck function
by about 94.4 %).
-
temperature sensors on satellites report much less warming in the
upper atmosphere (which the theory of global warming predicts should warm first) than is reported
by temperature sensors on the ground.
This simple radiative example (convective transport is not being allowed) shows that any finite surface
temperature Ts can be supported in radiative equilibrium with any arbitrarily cold «
upper atmosphere»
temperature Tt,
by prescribing the appropriate LW opacity TAU for the atmospheric layer, with the energy required to maintain a fixed Ts adjusted accordingly.
Regarding your most recent comment, I believe you are making the same mistake you made earlier
by confusing Tt with the
temperature of the
upper atmosphere (without ozone, it would be hard to call it a «stratosphere» so I'll use that term in quotes).
Senator and presidential candidate Ted Cruz recently organized a Senate hearing on the
temperature record in which he called upon carefully selected witnesses to testify that calculations of
temperature made
by satellite observations of the
upper atmosphere are superior to measurements made
by thermometers at the Earth's surface.
-- Smith et al., 2007 https://search.proquest.com/openview/cba4766420ef04f09227ccf861784a90/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=40569 The
upper atmospheres of the four Solar System giant planets exhibit high
temperatures that can not be explained
by the absorption of sunlight.
Most certainly, however since we are in an inverted lapse rate at sea compared to the
atmosphere the
upper layers will not warm / thermal diffuse the lower layers due to a density problem induced
by the
temperature differences, hence the uppermost molecules will be agitated the most, which will lead to... evaporation.
Year - to - year variability, however, is determined mostly
by temperature variations in the
upper atmosphere.
A third example would be the research on how incoming solar irradiance influences China's thermometer
temperature records, showing that over periods of many decades the variations in total solar irradiance in the
upper atmosphere are matched
by variations at the surface.
There is a heat flow from the surface to the
upper atmosphere, largely in the form of convection currents, driven
by the
temperature gradient, to replace the lost heat and maintain equilibrium.
The.2 ° Fahrenheit change you indicate this contradicts is in reference to «global
temperature» which takes into account Land, Sea,
upper atmosphere and the heat absorbed
by the melting of land ice.
SummaryFor two years beginning in 2013, a large team led
by Sanjay Limaye set out to combine and compare the following: Venusian atmospheric data collected
by probes in the 1970s and 1980s (used to create the Venus International Reference
Atmosphere, or VIRA) Venus Express data on the vertical and horizontal structure of the atmosphereEarth - based observations of the upper atmosphere temperature structure of Venus made since VIRAFigure 1a: Vertical coverage of post-VIRA atmospheric structure
Atmosphere, or VIRA) Venus Express data on the vertical and horizontal structure of the atmosphereEarth - based observations of the
upper atmosphere temperature structure of Venus made since VIRAFigure 1a: Vertical coverage of post-VIRA atmospheric structure
atmosphere temperature structure of Venus made since VIRAFigure 1a: Vertical coverage of post-VIRA atmospheric structure experi....
The same amount of energy that would warm the entire
atmosphere up to the tropopause
by 1 °C would raise the
upper ocean (0 - 700m)
temperature by 0.0045 °C and the entire ocean
by 0.0007 °C.
One effect among many is to reduce the
temperature gradient within the skin layer of the ocean and hence reduce the rate of cooling of the
upper mixed layer (the first few meters of which are warmed
by the Sun) to the
atmosphere and also, radiatively, through the atmospheric infrared window, directly to space.
In February 2016, Carl Mears and colleague Frank Wentz published a peer - reviewed paper that adjusted upwards the satellite - derived
temperatures for the
upper atmosphere since 1998
by as much as 0.2 of a degree Celsius.
Heat from anomalously warm ocean
temperatures is transported vertically and eventually northward
by unusually active tropical convection (thunderstorms), warming the
upper atmosphere in the lower latitudes.
In the absorption lines, the outgoing LWR intensity is determined
by the local
temperature at the last diffusion surface — so the
upper atmosphere temperature.
The reason why Figure 9.1 in IPCC AR4 is disconcerting is that the
temperature anomaly in the
upper tropical
atmosphere bears the signature of increased moist convective activity, which means that the hydrological cycle probably gets perturbed
by increased GHG forcings, hence affecting rainfall patterns.