Sentences with phrase «by upward flowing»

A primary line of evidence is the frequency and locations of earthquakes beneath the volcano, caused by upward flowing magma.

The downward flow is (partly) balanced by upward flow near the equator (Ekman suction).

But also just realizing that the ebbs of desire will be accompanied by upward flows is one way to ensure expectations for sex don't get in the way of pleasure from sex, especially in the context of long - term relationships.

Not exact matches

Institutional investors have projected upward price trends by calculating the rising flow of pension fund and mutual fund savings into the market.

Helium — the only element without a natural solid state — becomes a frictionless fluid that seemingly defies gravity by flowing upward in a beaker.

A year ago, they achieved an effect called superwicking — by which the texture of a material forces water to flow upward — on metal surfaces by etching them using extremely fast, quadrillionth of a second, high - energy laser pulses.

The slow upward flow of water insures that the short lived radioactive gases produced by fission die off before the reactor coolant reaches the above - ground portion of the plant (another bonus of gravity driven flow!).

Apana vayu, the downward flow of prana through the body, is at play, drawing energy down the backs of the legs and out the heels; meanwhile prana vayu, upward flow, keeps the heart from collapsing and supports the low back by lifting the belly in and up, creating a platform for the tailbone to lift up and off of.

Your hardship must be caused by your mortgage payments adjusting upward, or due to circumstances that created temporary cash flow problems, but it can't impair your ability to make payments on your new FHA mortgage.

Brilliant beams of white, yellow, orange and red emanate from the buoy and flow upward against a deep black, star - specked background as if it were floating through space in a sci - fi scene that's been invaded by webs of Abstract Expressionist paint.

That remaining deficit must be accounted for and it already has been catered for by the pre-existing upward flow of energy from the ocean bulk below which is always present even in the absence of DLR

v) So if the stratosphere was not being cooled by a dearth of energy from below it must be cooling from an even greater increase of energy flowing upward towards space.

However there would then be more conduction, convection and on Earth more evaporation from the surface for an increased upward energy flow which would work to maintain the lapse rate set by sun and pressure.

The evaporative, conductive and radiative processes combined then set up a thermal gradient causing an upward flow of energy from water to air from where that 1 mm layer touches the ocean bulk below, up across the cooler layer then to the Knudsen layer by reversing the normal (warm at the top and cool at the bottom) temperature gradient which exists from that 1 mm layer down to the ocean bottom.

So if one increases the rate of downwelling IR (thereby increasing the evaporation rate) then the increase in upward energy flow caused by the fall in the temperature of that 1 mm layer will be greater than the decrease in upward energy flow that will result from any reduced temperature differential between the topmost Knudsen layer and the ocean bulk arising from the application of Fourier's Law.

If it cools then upward energy flow is being increased by DLR.

That remaining deficit must be accounted for and it already has been provided by the pre-existing upward flow of energy from the ocean bulk below which is always present even in the absence of DLR

If it warms then upward energy flow is being reduced by DLR.

Without the heat flow from the surface there would be no back radiation since it is the upward radiation, convection and heat conduction that are responsible for the heating of the atmosphere which, in turn, results in the emission of radiation by atmosphere.

However on balance I think that the extra DLR just results in a zero effect on the «normal» upward energy flow because all the DLR would be used up in enhancing the rate of evaporation and accounting for the energy deficit caused by that enhancement of evaporation by virtue of the enthalpy of vapourisation (vapourisation has a net cooling effect).

6) Secondly that same upward energy gradient caused by evaporation pulls energy out of the heated ocean skin fast enough to prevent the warmer temperature of that skin from slowing down the energy flow from the subskin below.

By increasing surface area it increases evaporation for a faster upward flow.

There is no raining down watts upon to the surface, there are ALWAYS more going upward, and, that by physics means there is only a mild ~ 60 - 70 W / m ^ 2 flowing from the surface toward space.