Sentences with phrase «by valid evidence»

My (admittedly boring) point is that whatever the findings of that team of disinterested analysts — whether or not the SCC was found to be supported by valid evidence — would make no practical difference.

Science could have been done, instead of swamping us with ideological dogma unsupported by valid evidence.

I was referring to your comment on «Trump's approach» re independent research of SCC: «if it is found to be unsupported by valid evidence to use this as the basis to unwind much of the Obama and EPA polices...»

Not exact matches

Always remember: «By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the scriptural record.»

Evolution = gaps ID = a valid premise based on evidence that random processes can not assemble complex life by themselves.

If you think that your personal experiences and emotions consti - tute evidence, then by that same logic, every other god and religion is equally as valid, and their followers say and feel just as you do.

@Nonimus I think that is a valid perception and indeed one that can be supported by textual evidence.

If we start by declaring that only material things exist and only material evidence is valid, no wonder we find no «evidence» that God exists.

I understand the argument is straightforward, but it is: 1) based in definitional fiat (there is equally valid evidence to suggest that god is malevolent or simply apathetic); 2) actually embraces the god says so because it is good prong of the dilemma; and 3) attempts to constrain god by limiting god's possible range of choice.

(available on the web, viewed by over 3,000) contains a kind of «doctrinal statement» on 3 days and 3 nights (Tuesday crucifixion and Friday resurrection) and I think it can be regarded as valid until someone refutes the findings and evidence contained in it.

By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the Scriptural record.

If we only take things that can be empirically measured as being valid evidence (an empirical hermeneutic), then faith claims will, by virtue of being faith claims, remain unsubstantiated.

Last line» ■ By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the scriptural record.

From Answers in Genesis:» ■ By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the scriptural record.

Last but not least: «By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the Scriptural record.

So unless you can provide evidence backed by the scientific method, you have no valid argument.

When that happens, we are all obligated to demand that those beliefs are valid and supported by verifiable evidence.

However, when 50 children were evaluated with the Autism Diagnostic Interview — Revised 35 and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule — Generic, 36 94 % met criteria for ASD on both instruments, and 100 % met criteria on at least 1 instrument.37 Record - review validation studies conducted by the investigators demonstrate that the predictors of valid ASD diagnoses were having more than 2 diagnoses in the medical record.38 Most influenza infections in our study were determined from International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnostic codes rather than serologic evidence.

Regardless of the type of legal proceeding or which side uses scientific evidence, the forensic scientist must be able to write a report and testify under oath about: what facts or items of evidence were analyzed or tested; what tests or analyses were used; how valid or reliable those tests or analyses have been found to be by other courts; why and how the forensic scientist was qualified to conduct those tests or analyses; and, what the results of the tests or analyses were and how those results are relevant to the issues in dispute.

Scientifically valid and clearly written reviews of research on practical programs are essential to evidence - based reform, so the clearinghouse has been eagerly awaited by all who believe that educational practice should emphasize programs with strong evidence of effectiveness.

It is the very beginning of a possible story, opening opportunities for students to make valid predictions, based on evidence from the text or to continue the story by keeping the theme alive throughout.

Also an opportunity for students to make valid predictions of what may happen in each text using evidence to back - up their views or continuing the story by keeping the theme alive and evident throughout.

By leveraging the popularity of digital video games and by applying Evidence Centered Design (ECD), the game - based formative assessments address the needs of both students and teachers for reliable and valid real - time actionable data within a motivating learning environmenBy leveraging the popularity of digital video games and by applying Evidence Centered Design (ECD), the game - based formative assessments address the needs of both students and teachers for reliable and valid real - time actionable data within a motivating learning environmenby applying Evidence Centered Design (ECD), the game - based formative assessments address the needs of both students and teachers for reliable and valid real - time actionable data within a motivating learning environment.

REQUIRED QUALIFICATIONS: A bachelor's degree or higher with at least 24 credit hours in content area Valid IndianaTeaching License for Grades K - 5 or 6 Demonstrates strong writing skills as evidenced by a written response included with Application, answering the following questions: o Describe one experience where you made a significant difference in a student's academic achievement.o Describe a time in which you have used student data to drive greater levels of student achievement.o Describe one way you have successfully integrated technology into your classroom.

The weight of evidence about the impact of teacher quality on measurable student outcomes shows that teacher quality is dwarfed by out - of - school factors, and the evidence on value - added methods of determining teacher quality is not valid.

Now to be clear, here, I do think that not just «grossly ineffective» but also simply «bad teachers» should be fired, but the indicators used to do this must yield valid inferences, as based on the evidence, as critically and appropriately consumed by the parties involved, after which valid and defensible decisions can and should be made.

Among the cases deemed valid, we find suggestive evidence that students taught by TFA teachers in elementary and middle school were less likely to miss school due to unexcused absences and suspensions (compared to non-TFA teachers in the same school), although point estimates are very small.

Their research explored whether there was evidence of this kind of bias by conducting what researchers call a «sensitivity analysis» to test whether the results from the L.A. Times model were valid and reliable.

Oklahoma State Representative Scooter Park said that «HB2957 is a step in the right direction — driven by the support of Superintendents across the state, we can continue to remove the costly and time - consuming portions of the TLE system such as unnecessary data collection requirements as well as open the door for local school districts to develop their own qualitative evaluation system for their teachers according to their choice of a valid, reliable, research based and evidence - based qualitative measure.»

Your statements and opinions must be backed up by valid scientific evidence and data from recognized field experts, and your conclusions must point to additional work that might be warranted or new questions and issues that may arise as technology does.

The most considerable difference is that argument should present a claim supported by reasoning and evidence which persuades your reader that the thesis of your essay writing is a valid one.

Once again, the authors are applying methods developed by others in ways different from their original intent without acknowledging as much, and without providing evidence that such an application is valid.

Any pet store that sells dogs must provide purchasers of dogs with the following information at the time of sale: • A certificate of medical health completed by a veterinarian stating that the dog has been examined and there is no evidence of disease, illness, or injury at the time of the examination; • The name, complete address, and telephone number of the breeder that bred the dog, the regulated dog breeding kennel where the dog was kept, housed, and maintained, and the regulated dog intermediary from whom the pet store acquired the dog, as applicable; and • A money - back guarantee that is valid for up to 21 days after the date of purchase of the dog.

The real question is whether or not these are supported by evidence to make them valid.

In addition, legislation enacted in November of 1991 specifies that a U.S. or Canadian drivers» license or non-driver identification card, a valid passport, or an identification card issued by the United States Armed Forces must be used as written evidence of age for the purchase of alcoholic beverages.

Well stated by Mike Roddy but it needs to be pointed out that valid evidence always correlates well, but unfortunately high correlation does not necessarily mean valid evidence.

Given the rarity of a consensus - overturning event, the only sensible prior is to assume that a consensus is probably valid absent very strong evidence to the contrary, which is incidentally the position adopted by the arch-sceptic Bertrand Russell.

By adroitly combining valid information with culturally affirming meanings, these communications succeed in getting people to reflectively assess evidence that they might otherwise dismiss out of hand (btw, if your goal is not simply to get people to open - mindedly consider evidence using their own powers of reason — if you just want to make them believe something, who cares how — you are not a science communicator; you are a propagandist).

The main thesis that «valid scientific questions were suppressed» is grave, but it is both implausible and unsupported by any evidence.

It appears from your uninformative reason why my comment didn't «comport» to your very dodgy Comments Policy, that in your mind, when you say; «a paper from years ago», that you are now saying that valid scientific evidence backed up by the Earth Sciences department at Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, The American Geophysical Union & Harvard University has a shelf life and if it exceeds a certain time frame it is deemed invalid.

I am happy to answer questions about the content of the paper, and, if you think you can make a valid rebuttal, just send such to the CEO of PSI and a response will be forthcoming if you make valid points supported by evidence.

The Wallace et al. 2016 study represents a new and interesting approach to climate science research which should yield very interesting and much more valid results since the weight given to each likely variable is determined by available evidence rather than the guesses of carefully selected «experts» and incorporated into their largely arbitrary computer models.

However, claims based on «eyeballing» and similar offered here in the thread by Mr. Coal - Magazine Editor, who is probably going to write his PhD thesis soon where he refutes global warming using «eyeballing», and by other «skeptics» are not a scientifically valid approach to provide evidence for the assertion of the «stopped» global warming.

'' Two incompetent whitewash investigations by Penn State (Mann & Sandusky) is perfectly valid evidence to support my inference Penn State is corrupt.»

That said, the case for fuel poverty is not supported by the evidence in Europe or in the Americas; there are some valid African and Asian national cases, but they by and large have little to do with excess winter deaths.

Although his comment suggested such, I doubt that he really believes that individual commenters here were responding because something had been «deemed urgent» by some unspecified «deemers,» and, (2) it seems to me that you might be drawing conclusions from Lewandowsky's research that (assuming you find his research methodology to be valid — which some seem to question) are not supported by the evidence he offered: Evidence that informs the question of whether conspiracy ideation is relatively more prevalent on the «skeptical» side than the «realist&raquevidence he offered: Evidence that informs the question of whether conspiracy ideation is relatively more prevalent on the «skeptical» side than the «realist&raquEvidence that informs the question of whether conspiracy ideation is relatively more prevalent on the «skeptical» side than the «realist» side.

There is plenty of evidence to suggest that science has not yet enlightened (if it ever can) anyone enough to reject valid questions out of hand and declare them resolved by the priest class, just trust them, it has been resolved.

The scientific issue is then whether these are valid proxies — and this is an issue that is not settled by Rule N, but one that requires scientific evidence.

The measurements taken in the 1800's were acceptable but not as reliable and valid as the wiki article potrays, as evidenced by the still significantly off measurements and predictions made in the 1950's, although these facts do not undo past measurements completely, I take issue with the brief and under stated remarks about the 1800's and shying away from calibration issues.

One such case is Don Easterbrook, whose testimony in front of a Washington State Committee in March 2013 so distorted the scientific facts that most of the members of his department (WWU geology) wrote a public letter, saying» [his views] are neither scientifically valid nor supported by the overwhelming preponderance of evidence on the topic».