Sentences with phrase «by valid scientific evidence»

Your statements and opinions must be backed up by valid scientific evidence and data from recognized field experts, and your conclusions must point to additional work that might be warranted or new questions and issues that may arise as technology does.

Not exact matches

So unless you can provide evidence backed by the scientific method, you have no valid argument.

Regardless of the type of legal proceeding or which side uses scientific evidence, the forensic scientist must be able to write a report and testify under oath about: what facts or items of evidence were analyzed or tested; what tests or analyses were used; how valid or reliable those tests or analyses have been found to be by other courts; why and how the forensic scientist was qualified to conduct those tests or analyses; and, what the results of the tests or analyses were and how those results are relevant to the issues in dispute.

The main thesis that «valid scientific questions were suppressed» is grave, but it is both implausible and unsupported by any evidence.

It appears from your uninformative reason why my comment didn't «comport» to your very dodgy Comments Policy, that in your mind, when you say; «a paper from years ago», that you are now saying that valid scientific evidence backed up by the Earth Sciences department at Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, The American Geophysical Union & Harvard University has a shelf life and if it exceeds a certain time frame it is deemed invalid.

The scientific issue is then whether these are valid proxies — and this is an issue that is not settled by Rule N, but one that requires scientific evidence.

One such case is Don Easterbrook, whose testimony in front of a Washington State Committee in March 2013 so distorted the scientific facts that most of the members of his department (WWU geology) wrote a public letter, saying» [his views] are neither scientifically valid nor supported by the overwhelming preponderance of evidence on the topic».