An independent press publishing works of literature and nonfiction
by voices of conscience.
Not exact matches
How we discharge the duties
of citizenship — whether
by accepting the creeping authoritarianism
of the last two decades, or
by raising our
voices on behalf
of the laws and democratic norms
of our country — is a question
of moral
conscience, suitable for confession, and demanding repentance if we err.
However, in a world formed
by relativism,
conscience is not well understood, and often becomes a case
of listening to «my
voice» rather than «the
voice of God».
When I hear a
voice in my head, I don't know if it is God, or some layer
of ego, consciousness or
conscience... I need to pass it
by the Bible.
Although it has been damaged
by sin, the
voice of conscience is something God - given.
People should realize that this is the
Voice of those who have a
voice because they have their dollars and they have the power to kill, with a button, the whole human race and under their own roof the power to kill, day
by day, with counterinformation their own sickly
conscience.23
In that conversation,
voices have been heard urging a view
of conscience that is curious, even dangerous: Under certain circumstances,
conscience may permit or even require that a person choose acts that the Church has consistently taught are intrinsically wrong — such as using artificial means
of contraception, or receiving Holy Communion while living the married life in a union that's not been blessed
by the Church.
That reading can easily be used
by those who wish to permit spouses to follow
consciences that counsel them to use contraception (
consciences that are not educated to hear the
voice of God) rather than abide
by Church teaching.
The difference between the two rests, I believe, in the contrast between intentional, cohesive,
conscience - shaping communities
of identity and social solidarity, not only in Utah but in the Mormon minority communities around the country, and Evangelical communities that are too often influenced
by raging pundits, talk radio, and TV shout - shows — and these
voices sometimes drown out the pastor's.
In other words,
by looking to the state to affirm our right to practice religion, we have sacrificed our ability to be the
voice of conscience to the state.
It is impaneled to act as an «arm
of the court,» as authorized
by the State Constitution, to be a
voice of the people and
conscience of the community.
The little
voice is fortunately outweighed
by the big
voice of my
conscience.