this Court take notice of cases that meet the technical prerequisites of § 1252; in other cases where an Act of Congress is held unconstitutional by a federal court, review in this Court is available only
by writ of certiorari.
Not exact matches
About Blog RIPL has been cited as persuasive authority
by the United States Court
of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and parties petitioning the United States Supreme Court for a
writ of certiorari.
About Blog RIPL has been cited as persuasive authority
by the United States Court
of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and parties petitioning the United States Supreme Court for a
writ of certiorari.
About Blog RIPL has been cited as persuasive authority
by the United States Court
of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and parties petitioning the United States Supreme Court for a
writ of certiorari.
This is why we still write
writs of habeas corpus «seize the body,»
certiorari «to be more fully informed,» subpoena «under penalty,» and quo warranto «
by what authority.»
«The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions or orders or
writs, including
writs in the nature
of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and
certiorari, whichever may be appropriate, for the enforcement
of any
of the rights conferred
by this Part.»
More than two months ago, the Supreme Court
of the United States granted Samsung's petition for
writ of certiorari (request for top - court review) regarding design patent damages, which was supported
by Google, Facebook and other tech giants.
But, here, two
of the Second Circuit's active judges ruled against Marblegate, the dissent was
by a senior judge who can not vote on an en banc petition, and the Second Circuit has historically granted fewer en banc rehearings than any other circuit court.5 Other avenues could include Marblegate filing a petition for a
writ of certiorari with the US Supreme Court and / or pursuing other federal or state law remedies, including state law theories
of successor liability or fraudulent conveyance against the new EDMC subsidiary, theories that the Second Circuit noted as potential causes
of action but did not analyze.
San Francisco, CA (Law Firm Newswire) January 27, 2017 — A team from Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, led
by Theodore B. Olson, the former Solicitor General
of the United States, will represent Mandana D. Farhang and M.A. Mobile Ltd. in the Supreme Court
of the United States in opposition to a petition for a
writ of certiorari recently filed
by the Indian Institute
of Technology, Kharagpur (IITK).
«It is the established rule
of this Court that the proper method
of reviewing a judgment for civil contempt
of the kind here involved is
by a petition for common law
writ of certiorari...»
2014 — Fresenius v. Baxter (US Supreme Court)
Writ of certiorari by Baxter denied, effectively ending this 10 - year patent infringement litigation and scoring a complete victory for Fresenius.
About Blog RIPL has been cited as persuasive authority
by the United States Court
of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and parties petitioning the United States Supreme Court for a
writ of certiorari.
About Blog RIPL has been cited as persuasive authority
by the United States Court
of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and parties petitioning the United States Supreme Court for a
writ of certiorari.