Sentences with phrase «by your individual court»

Lawyers should be aware that since the turn of the century federally - appointed judges have participated in extensive information security training, organized and presented by the National Judicial Institute and by individual courts.

It's designed with Alabama drivers in mind — the material focuses on Alabama traffic laws and regulations, and is state approved by individual courts throughout Alabama.

Our Washington defensive driving courses are approved by individual courts throughout the state for ticket deferral.

Our Washington defensive driving courses are approved by individual courts throughout the state for ticket deferral; our voluntary defensive driving course can be taken to help you get a discount on auto insurance.

The online South Carolina defensive driving course is certified by individual courts throughout the state to erase your traffic ticket and help you keep a clean driving record.

Approved by individual courts in Oklahoma, you'll fulfill court - ordered requirements and reduce points from your license from any computer.

Our traffic school programs are approved or licensed by State Departments of Transportation, Department of Motor Vehicles and by individual Courts from one end of the country to the other.

The Louisiana Driver Improvement Course is approved by individual courts in Louisiana.

WA Defensive Driving 4 - Hour Level 1 course is approved by individual courts throughout Washington state for ticket deferral.

On the other hand, database searches are also not 100 % accurate because, as opposed to the county court search, each individual court / agency that contributes information will decide what is included, how far back the records go, and the information is updated in intervals on either a monthly, quarterly, semi-annual, or annual basis (determined by the individual court).

Not exact matches

The lawsuits, each filed by individual artists in a US federal court in Los Angeles, ask a judge to create a class - action suit in which other alleged victims can collectively seek damages.

By signing an arbitration clause, both parties agree that any disputes will be heard not by a court, but by a neutral individual or panel (which you should designateBy signing an arbitration clause, both parties agree that any disputes will be heard not by a court, but by a neutral individual or panel (which you should designateby a court, but by a neutral individual or panel (which you should designateby a neutral individual or panel (which you should designate).

The decision by the New York Court of Appeals gives such individuals legal standing to seek custody or visitation rights.

The court order, issued on Thursday, came in response to a flood of individuals seeking a piece of an estate some have valued at more than $ 500 million, left by Prince when he died unexpectedly in April at the age of 57, apparently without a will.

Those individuals are often too busy to hear a sales pitch and are likely already being courted by a dozen other vendors.

«In the district court, NFIB's standing was established by many individual small business - owners, in addition to Mary Brown, all of whom are members of NFIB and who have exercised their right to not purchase insurance,» says Karen Harned, executive director of NFIB's legal center.

This time, Pomerantz established the right of individual foreign investors who purchased foreign - traded shares of a foreign corporation to pursue claims for securities fraud in a U.S. court, thereby overcoming obstacles created by the U.S. Supreme Court's 2010 readcourt, thereby overcoming obstacles created by the U.S. Supreme Court's 2010 readCourt's 2010 read more

Instead of taking place with a court and a judge, arbitration is a private process with an arbitrator and is generally preferred by companies as it can require individuals to each pursue restitution individually instead of banding together as a group.

The Fisa court plays no role in the selection of those individuals, nor does it monitor who is selected by the NSA.

In the event that we are not able to resolve a dispute, we each agree that any and all disputes, controversies, or claims arising under, arising out of, or relating in any way to this agreement, or the contractual relationship established by this agreement (whether in contract, tort, or under any statute, regulation, ordinance, or any other source of law) shall be resolved on an individual basis through binding arbitration administered by the American Arbitration Association, in accordance with the American Arbitration Association's rules for arbitration of consumer - related disputes (accessible at https://www.adr.org/aaa/faces/rules)(except that you may assert individual claims in small claims court, if your claims qualify).

Based upon this analysis, we provide our clients with recommendations concerning whether they should: (1) move to be appointed lead plaintiff; (2) file an individual non-class action in federal or state court; or (3) take no active role, that is, remain a class member in an action initiated by others.

In October 2014, Pomerantz once again secured crucial victories in this ground - breaking litigation, establishing the right of individual foreign investors who purchased shares on a non-U.S. exchange to pursue claims for securities fraud in a U.S. court, thereby overcoming obstacles created by Morrison.

This time, Pomerantz established the right of individual foreign investors who purchased foreign - traded shares of a foreign corporation to pursue claims for securities fraud in a U.S. court, thereby overcoming obstacles created by the U.S. Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Morrison v. Nat» l Australia Bank court, thereby overcoming obstacles created by the U.S. Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Morrison v. Nat» l Australia Bank Court's 2010 decision in Morrison v. Nat» l Australia Bank Ltd..

Obama says he believes in an individual right to keep and bear arms, but if even one of the non-liberal Justices is replaced by an Obama appointee, you can be sure that we will have an anti-Heller and anti-individual right majority on the Supreme Court.

No matter which way the Court goes, it will risk opening another door to the bottomless pit of constitutional litigation based on claims of individual autonomy, whether it is called by that name or not.

Since 1972, the year after Lemon, the Supreme Court has rejected every claim by an individual to a free - exercise exemption, with the sole exception of claims for unemployment compensation, which are controlled by clear precedent dating back to 1963.

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the ruling on Friday, saying the family had not persuaded the three - judge panel «that the individual prayers or other remarks to be given by students at graduation are, in fact, school - sponsored.»

Like other retail corporations, Hobby Lobby was not affected by the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on the individual mandate policy in June.

Over at No Left Turns, Peter Lawler reminds us that part of the problem with an unrestrained judicial activism is precisely its championing of the ever expanding rights of the Lockean individual — the essential premise of Texas v. Lawrence is that the word «liberty» as used in the Fourteenth Amendment is an indeterminate concept meant to be expanded indefinitely by the Supreme Court.

Fortunately, they had very little success, because the courts rejected attempts by individual groups to impose their views on others.

This principle requires not only that individuals have enforceable rights against data users, but also that individuals have recourse to courts or a government agency to investigate and / or prosecute non-compliance by data processors.

The United States and other Western nations already allow terminating such individuals by withholding tube - supplied sustenance — as vividly exposed in the legal and cultural conflagration over the court - ordered dehydration death of Terri Schiavo.

The Supreme Court has ruled that the «negative right» to the free exercise of religion guaranteed by the First Amendment does not prevent individuals from being coerced into obeying laws of general applicability when doing so violates their religious beliefs.

They cite the fact that focusing all that data onto on individuals is subject to approval by the FISA court.

We also oppose provisions of the bill that expand the immigration detention system and erode the basic rights afforded to immigrants, including the provisions that allow for the indefinite detention of individuals who can not be deported to their home countries; that expedite removal proceedings or automatically imprison immigrants without providing them access to attorneys or judges; that increase detention capacity by an additional 20,000 beds to house immigrants awaiting their day in court; and that diminish the checks and balances of judicial review over immigration decisions.

Amar's thesis, in a nutshell, is this: 1) The Bill of Rights was not conceived by the framers as a charter of individual liberties in the manner now routinely employed by the Court.

In the pending court case for overturning California's Proposition 8, which banned «gay marriage,» two leading conservative legal scholars face off: Charles J. Cooper, taking the classical conservative line that organic social institutions such as marriage have an inherent value and can not be redefined by legal fiat, and Theodore Olson, taking the more libertarian line that government should simply regulate contractual relationships between individuals and not become involved in private matters.

In the pending court case for overturning California's Proposition 8, which banned «gay marriage,» two leading conservative legal scholars face off: Charles J. Cooper, taking the classical conservative line that organic social institutions such as marriage have an inherent value and can not be redefined by legal fiat, and Theodore Olson, taking the more libertarian line that government should simply regulate contractual relationships between individuals... Continue Reading»

The validity of individual marriages and of divorce were among the functions of the church courts and were regulated by the law of the Church.

But no right worthy of its name is held by other than individuals, or so the Court said in Eisenstadt v. Baird (1971).

Because public opinion supporting certain kinds of abortion is close to unanimous; it was formed before the 1973 Supreme Court decision; and the majority that have come of sexual age since that year now take for granted that fertility decisions are to be made only by the individuals involved.

While Canadian parliamentarians in theory had the same freedom, their options were strictly limited: The substantial decision had been made by the Supreme Court, which already defined an individual right to receive suicide assistance.

Although many of these claims challenge the veracity of «organic,» «healthy,» and «100 %» claims on labels, several states are affording new opportunities to attack ingredient labels — an area that federal courts have traditionally found to be preempted (barred) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with no private right of action for individual citizens.

A final judgement handed down by the Beijing People's High Court confirmed that a Chinese individual who had registered the Ben Fu trademark in 2009 had failed to demonstrate any genuine use of the trademark for wine or related business activities.

The judgment, handed down by Beijing High People's Court, found that a Chinese individual who had registered the Ben Fu trademark in 2009 had «failed to demonstrate any genuine use of the trademark for wine or related business activities,» Treasury Wines said in a statement.

It specialises in «providing free, fast and effective legal support to survivors of domestic violence, usually by helping individuals obtain injunctions from their local county court.

Since then, individual soldiers, politicians, and heads of state (including Charles Taylor of Liberia and Slobodan Milosevic of Serbia) have been tried and convicted by the Court.

The court itself was instrumental in helping to refine the definition of a legitimate target, insisting that there needed to be a specific and immediate threat posed by a specific individual.

However, Congress would have to demonstrate at least a rational basis (perhaps even more in the view of the Court at that time) to justify the law and that interpretation will need to be made by the Court at that time on its individual merits.

The court overturned limits on independent expenditures by individuals and total campaign expenditures.