GCAM reference scenario results showing a global GDP and population drivers, b global primary energy consumption by fuel source,
c global electricity production by technology, and d global allocation of land among major land cover and land use categories
I would say that making the food, fuel and energy more expensive, that the subsistence farmer in Nepal uses, in exchange for slowing the rate of growth of
global warming by.01
C per century (just an example) and slowing the Nepal government from slowly providing
electricity to their citizens would not be good idea (on a cost benefit analysis).