Sentences with phrase «caesarean section in»

Access to facility delivery and caesarean section in north - central Liberia: a cross-sectional community - based study

«Birth (Cyrus)» is an oil on canvas depiction of Cyrus being delivered via caesarean section in hospital.

«Dr Marleen Temmerman, Director of WHO Department of Reproductive Health and Research including HRP states, «These conclusions highlight the value of caesarean section in saving the lives of mothers and newborns.

«In one Australian study, 62 % of women who had a caesarean section in a private hospital said their health care provider had recommended it» (quote article 1).

Current obstetrical standards mandate a Caesarean section in such a birth, according to testimony in the trial.

Not exact matches

Women in their thirties and forties have diminished fertility, are at higher risk of miscarriage and are more likely to experience birth complications requiring a caesarean section.

Mummy in question figured it couldn't get much worse and answered in an equally loud voice «That's right, Mummy is having a Caesarean section»...

Should having a caesarean section always lead to a surgical delivery in the...

API's position in this regard is not to judge mothers» decisions in choosing an elective caesarean, but rather that mothers and fathers be given accurate research - based information on the risks and benefits of elective c - sections in order to make an educated and informed choice.

My wife is having a C - section (Caesarean section) and I am assuming will be in the hospital for 3 days minimum.

Most people that choose to birth at home have only chosen after extensive research and feel that the small risk of a serious complication is preferable to the high rate of intervention in a hospital setting (including the 33 % national caesarean section rate.)

Most people that choose to birth at home have chosen this option after extensive research and feel that the small risk of a serious complication is preferable to the high rate of interventions in a hospital setting (including the 33 % national caesarean section rate, 45 % at some local hospitals).

Most people that choose to birth at home have only chosen after extensive research and feel that the small risk of a serious complication is preferable to the high rate of interventions in a hospital setting (including the 33 % national caesarean section rate.)

My understanding of one of the evidence based benefits of a doula came from studies which looked at «a woman known to the labouring woman» but not involved in her medical care being present for the labour reduced Caesarean section.

«Ms Thurgood and her partner, Dwayne Gates, had had three children all born by caesarean section before Kate discovered she was pregnant again in March 2010.

The rising Caesarean delivery (C - section) rate in the past two decades could possibly be the reason for such findings.

planning birth in an obstetric unit is associated with a higher rate of interventions, such as instrumental vaginal birth, caesarean section and episiotomy, compared with planning birth in other settings

There was a low rate of caesarean section, postpartum haemorrhage and third degree perinatal tears as well as low rates of stillbirth and early neonatal death in this sample of women and babies.

If an emergency situation arises and the baby needs to be delivered very quickly; emergency caesarean sections can be carried out in less than thirty minutes.

It takes longer to recover from a caesarean section than a natural birth and most women stay in hospital for around 3 - 4 days after the operation.

In the event of complications arising, a natural birth may not be possible and the doctor or midwife may recommend alternative methods including a caesarean section.

Despite the name, an emergency caesarean section is not always carried out in a life or death situation.

Caesarean sections may also be recommended if one of the babies is in the breech position or if the babies are sharing a placenta; if this is the case they may be deprived of oxygen during a natural birth and therefore a caesarean section would Caesarean sections may also be recommended if one of the babies is in the breech position or if the babies are sharing a placenta; if this is the case they may be deprived of oxygen during a natural birth and therefore a caesarean section would caesarean section would be safer.

In some cases, a midwife or doctor may recommend you have a caesarean section; this is usually the result of an existing medical condition or a problem which may cause a natural birth to be particularly painful or difficult.

Caesarean sections are becoming increasingly popular but they are still usually only recommended in certain circumstances.

Position of the baby: if the baby is in an awkward position, such as the breech position, a caesarean section may be recommended.

If the baby becomes distressed (this is detected by changes in the baby's heart rate or the presence of meconium, the baby's first stool) but it is already moving down the birth canal, forceps or Ventouse will usually be preferred to a caesarean section; if the baby is not moving down the birth canal and is becoming distressed, a caesarean section may be recommended.

Some women choose to have absolutely no medical involvement in their labour, meaning they have no pain relief, no medication and no foetal monitoring; this is a personal choice and will be supported by the medical team, as long as nothing happens which could threaten the life of the mother or baby; if an emergency situation arises, the doctor may recommend taking medication or having a caesarean section.

Caesarean sections may also be recommended if complications arise during labour or if the baby is in distress or in an awkward position.

A study commissioned by the Canadian health minister suggests that maternal or newborn programmes in Ontario can maintain low caesarean section rates over time, regardless of their size, location, level of care they provide, and population they serve.

The figures are broken down into first time mothers and mothers who have already given birth and provide important information on the rates of C - sections, instrumental deliveries, episiotomies and vaginal births after Caesareans in Ireland.

In a randomised controlled trial comparing community based care with standard hospital care a significant difference in caesarean section rates was found (13.3 % v 17.8 % respectively).29 Planning a home birth30 or booking for care at a midwife led birth centre is also associated with lower operative delivery rateIn a randomised controlled trial comparing community based care with standard hospital care a significant difference in caesarean section rates was found (13.3 % v 17.8 % respectively).29 Planning a home birth30 or booking for care at a midwife led birth centre is also associated with lower operative delivery ratein caesarean section rates was found (13.3 % v 17.8 % respectively).29 Planning a home birth30 or booking for care at a midwife led birth centre is also associated with lower operative delivery rates.

The Scandinavian countries and the Netherlands, which did not follow the trend towards steep increases in caesarean sections during the 1990s, 9 have a tradition of perceiving birth above all as a normal physiological process and of valuing low intervention rates.

C - section rates for first time mothers varied from 22.95 % in Sligo General up to 40.15 % in St Luke's Hospital Kilkenny with both units also reporting extremely low vaginal birth of Caesarean rates at 0.93 % and 3.51 % respectively.

The extent of medicalisation in Spain is reflected in some of the highest caesarean section rates in Europe (26.4 % in Catalonia with a 40 % increase over five years); obstetricians have been criticised for not allowing women to participate in decisions about their maternity care.11 Long term morbidity after childbirth can be substantial, 12 and this is particularly related to instrumental and caesarean delivery.

The fact is, a caesarean section is a major surgery, one that the World Health Organization has stated is happening far too often in the United States.

All women attended by an NHS midwife during labour in their planned place of birth, for any amount of time, were eligible for inclusion with the exception of women who had an elective caesarean section or caesarean section before the onset of labour, presented in preterm labour (< 37 weeks» gestation), had a multiple pregnancy, or who were «unbooked» (that is, received no antenatal care).

The odds of receiving individual interventions (augmentation, epidural or spinal analgesia, general anaesthesia, ventouse or forceps delivery, intrapartum caesarean section, episiotomy, active management of the third stage) were lower in all three non-obstetric unit settings, with the greatest reductions seen for planned home and freestanding midwifery unit births (table 4 ⇓).

«Further increasing rates of Caesarean section have led to an increase in the incidence of peripartum hysterectomy for morbidly adherent placenta.

The proportion of women with a «normal birth» (birth without induction of labour, epidural or spinal analgesia, general anaesthesia, forceps or ventouse delivery, caesarean section, or episiotomy9 10) varied from 58 % for planned obstetric unit births to 76 % in alongside midwifery units, 83 % in freestanding midwifery units, and 88 % for planned home births; the adjusted odds of having a «normal birth» were significantly higher in all three non-obstetric unit settings (table 5 ⇓).

Rates were low for caesarean section, postpartum haemorrhage, third degree perineal tears, stillbirth and early neonatal death in this sample of women and babies.

Term pregnancy, transport at first assessment because of decelerations, rupture of vasa previa before membranes ruptured, caesarean section, died in hospital two days after birth

The low emergency caesarean section rate and assisted vaginal birth rate in our study were consistent with the low rate of caesarean section (2.8 %) recorded in the Birthplace in England Study for women who planned a homebirth, 43 and in a South Australian study (9.2 % for planned homebirths v 27.1 % for hospital births).13 A low rate of caesarean section is also consistent with studies of homebirth in the US.36

Induction of Labour: * higher rates of Caesarean Section * increased risk of your baby being admitted to NICU (neonatal intensive care unit) * increased risk of forceps or vacuum (assisted delivery) * contractions may be stronger than a spontaneous labour * your labour is no longer considered «low risk» — less choices in where and how you birth, restricted birth positions, continuous monitoring CTG, time limits for which to labour in.

Of women in the study who planned further children, 91 % (136/149) said they would opt for a home birth again (including four who were delivered by caesarean section).

If your baby is breech your midwife will talk to you in depth about the pros and cons for a vaginal breech delivery and also for a caesarean section.

For example, a woman who was forced to have a caesarean section against her wishes in the UK sued the doctors (Ms S v St George's NHS Hospital Trust, 1998) and was awarded # 36,000 damages.

* In spring, our position became heightened when a HSE draft consent policy was circulated the day before a VBAC woman, Mother A, was brought before an emergency sitting of the High Court to force a Caesarean Section.

Those who had no known complications, such as a baby in breech or one with a congenital abnormality, or a previous Caesarean section.

The Szabos» story has a happy ending, but it shows that with the rising C - section rate — now one in three babies is born via Caesarean — women who want vaginal births sometimes have to fight to get them.