By the way Kramm has recently shown that if the climate sensitivity to 2x CO2 is as small as your value then it can not be discerned within the error of
calculating any average annual temperature and if something can't be observed then I wonder about its existence
Not exact matches
An
annual average of each station could be employed to
calculate and
annual average temperature surface and the
annuals and longer terms could be summarized the same way.
«
Calculating the
annual average temperature of the 119
temperature gauges in Nepal located at elevations on between 72 m and 4100 m, reveals an upward trend in values from 1961 — 1996 at a rate of almost 7C per 100 years (or 0.07 C / year)»
BoM CDO RAW data in this analysis are
calculated from the
annual average of daily
temperatures for each year and are subject to the usual discrepancies such as missing days, but are identical to BoM
annual estimates except for occasional 0.1 C variations caused by the BoM
averaging monthly
averages for
annual calculations instead of
averaging all available days per year for
annual calculations.
Divide the observation period into smaller sub-periods (whichever) and
calculate the total CO2 accumulations (or
average annual changes) and
average temperature anomalies for the sub-periods.