Sentences with phrase «calculated mean effect»

If at least three analyses were available we calculated mean effect sizes on discrete parenting behaviors (Table 2).
The number of experiments used to calculate mean effect sizes are shown in parentheses.
On CrimeSolutions.gov's Scoring Instrument for practices, internal validity is measured by the number of randomized controlled trials used to calculate the mean effect size.
Unfortunately, as a result of the dearth of the studies that have actually examined parenting styles, we were not able to calculate mean effect sizes for various parenting styles.

Not exact matches

System - wide sales growth and comparable sales are measured on a constant currency basis, which means that results exclude the effect of foreign currency translation and are calculated by translating prior year results at current year monthly average exchange rates.
Another way of calculating the proportional reduction in the content rule, is to consider the combined effect of the two thresholds. An auto part can qualify as TPP - made with just 30 % TPP content. A vehicle can qualify as TPP - made if 45 % of its content originate within the TPP — including auto parts which only had minority TPP content in the first place. This «double jeopardy» effect means that the theoretical minimum regional content for a finished vehicle to qualify for TPP trade preferences would be only 13.5 % (equal to 30 % of 45 %).
To contribute to an understanding of the underlying causes of these changes we compile various environmental records (and model - based interpretations of some of them) in order to calculate the direct effect of various processes on Earth's radiative budget and, thus, on global annual mean surface temperature over the last 800,000 years.
«We calculated that 3.6 percent of cases traveled, basically meaning that if you were able to focus on those mobile cases and reduce their mobility, you might have had a disproportionate effect on the epidemic,» said computational biologist Dr. Gytis Dudas, a Mahan Postdoctoral Fellow at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and the paper's lead author.
We calculated geometric mean and 95 % confidence intervals for MRI - measured breast density at ages 25 — 29 years across quartiles of fat intake using linear mixed - effect regression.
Calculated at the mean, students are 6.2 percentage points less likely to attend college, though the effect is not statistically significant.
If we used «vehicles» to move gravel from point A to point B... and we calculated an effect size on vehicles... we suffer from «regression towards the mean»; the child's wagon will look more powerful than it is (a higher effect size) and the 5 ton truck will look worse (a lower effect size).
Effect sizes (Cohen's d) for middle school students versus preservice teacher candidates were calculated by subtracting the mean of the second from the first and dividing the result by the pooled standard deviation (as in Cohen, 1988).
(18) SUBSIDY AMOUNT. - The term «subsidy amount» means the amount of budget authority sufficient to cover the estimated long - term cost to the Federal Government of a Federal credit instrument» (A) calculated on a net present value basis; and» (B) excluding administrative costs and any incidental effects on governmental receipts or outlays in accordance with the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661 et seq.).»
The complexity of the interaction between traditional IRA and Roth IRA rules plus the effects of employer plans and rollovers means that it is impossible for anyone to calculate all the tax interactions over a lifetime.
When calculating how much insurance you may need for your family, make sure you take the negative effect of inflation into consideration (didn't mean to rhyme there!).
Using LINEST, you can calculate the effect of MEAN REVERSION when you ignore the effect of valuations, You take the ratio of the relevant sum of the squares totals: sstotal = ssreg + ssresid.
Secondly, the spread around the model - mean value is calculated after the anomalies are taken which has the visual effect of minimizing the range of modeled temperatures.
Once such an IPCC exposition of the assumptions, complications and uncertainties of climate models was constructed and made public, it would immediately have to lead, in my view, to more questions from the informed public such as what does calculating a mean global temperature change mean to individuals who have to deal with local conditions and not a global average and what are the assumptions, complications and uncertainties that the models contain when it comes to determining the detrimental and beneficial effects of a «global» warming in localized areas of the globe.
In a system with multiple properties, causes and effects, averaging certainly can be done but the calculated result may not only not mean what you think it means, it may mean nothing at all in describing reality.
Alternatively, you can take an estimate of anthropogenic effects (e.g. the calculated change in equilibrium climate mean temp), and from that you can derive a conclusion about the natural variation.
Effect size for the adjusted mean difference between each treatment was calculated by dividing the mean difference in test score by the square root of the within mean square error for the adjusted post-test score.
Effect sizes were calculated as treatment minus control means for RCTs, and post-treatment minus pretreatment means for before and after studies, divided by the pooled standard deviation, and weighted by sample size.
Between - group effect sizes were calculated by subtracting the mean change from pretreatment to posttreatment in the wait - list group from the mean change in the CBCT group, dividing by the associated pooled standard deviation, and adjusting for small sample size.
We calculated effect sizes by dividing the mean difference between the trial arms by the pooled standard deviation.
We performed comparisons of means using analysis of variance, with planned post hoc analyses by the Tukey honestly significantly different test; effect sizes were obtained using mean differences with associated 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) and also calculated using Cohen d for purposes of comparability with related studies.
This was done in CMA by first calculating the individual effect size for each study and then calculating the weighted mean effect size using the corresponding metric for each question.
Effect sizes were calculated by dividing the mean difference between the trial arms by the pooled SD.
While using the adjusted mean difference, we used the unadjusted SDs in order to be able to compare effect sizes calculated from unadjusted and adjusted means, respectively.
Mean effect sizes calculated using only randomized controlled trials are considered to have fewer threats to internal validity then mean effect sizes calculated using only quasi-experimental designs.
We acknowledge that the variance estimate of the average synthetic effect sizes that are calculated should appropriately account for the correlation between the two outcomes, and we intend to report the correlation value, and the source / means of arriving at such a correlation if it is not reported within the primary study / studies.
Pooled standardised mean differences were calculated using random - effect models.
An estimate of the specific indirect effect was derived from the mean of 5,000 bootstrap samples, and bias corrected and accelerated 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated (Preacher & Hayes, 2008).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z