Sentences with phrase «call for evidence in»

Special Guardianship Review - Call for evidence (Reminder) We announced the DfE's Special Guardianship (SG) Review Call for Evidence in the July issue and there is still time to contribute and make your views heard.

A call for evidence in relation to the fifth carbon budget closed in June 2015 and these responses will be published later this year.

As reported by Schools Week, the government has launched a call for evidence in order to update guidance on what should be taught when sex education becomes compulsory in 2019.

The Government published a call for evidence in March, seeking to understand why claims for tax relief on expenses which employers do not reimburse to their employees increased 25 per cent to # 800 million per annum between 2009 - 10 and 2014 - 15.

Atheists present evidence, and call for evidence in return.

Not exact matches

These risks and uncertainties include, among others: the unfavorable outcome of litigation, including so - called «Paragraph IV» litigation and other patent litigation, related to any of our products or products using our proprietary technologies, which may lead to competition from generic drug manufacturers; data from clinical trials may be interpreted by the FDA in different ways than we interpret it; the FDA may not agree with our regulatory approval strategies or components of our filings for our products, including our clinical trial designs, conduct and methodologies and, for ALKS 5461, evidence of efficacy and adequacy of bridging to buprenorphine; clinical development activities may not be completed on time or at all; the results of our clinical development activities may not be positive, or predictive of real - world results or of results in subsequent clinical trials; regulatory submissions may not occur or be submitted in a timely manner; the company and its licensees may not be able to continue to successfully commercialize their products; there may be a reduction in payment rate or reimbursement for the company's products or an increase in the company's financial obligations to governmental payers; the FDA or regulatory authorities outside the U.S. may make adverse decisions regarding the company's products; the company's products may prove difficult to manufacture, be precluded from commercialization by the proprietary rights of third parties, or have unintended side effects, adverse reactions or incidents of misuse; and those risks and uncertainties described under the heading «Risk Factors» in the company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10 - K and in subsequent filings made by the company with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission («SEC»), which are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

In section one, «The Wakeup Call,» Huffington lays out the arguments for why we need sleep, pulling in evidence from history, religion, science, and economicIn section one, «The Wakeup Call,» Huffington lays out the arguments for why we need sleep, pulling in evidence from history, religion, science, and economicin evidence from history, religion, science, and economics.

The Fed could lower the bar more to «some further evidence» being required, which may also serve to assuage the concerns of at least one of the three voting policymakers who called for an immediate hike in September.

The video conferences are run by the Pentagon, which oversees strikes in those countries, and participants do not hesitate to call out a challenge, pressing for the evidence behind accusations of ties to Al Qaeda.

Kallo, for one, is taking the contentiousness in stride, calling the theatrics «noise» that overshadows what he views as solid results and evidence that Tesla «is successfully ramping Model 3 vehicle and battery production.»

In short, aside from some potential for a «clearing rally» to correct the short - term oversold condition of the market, even the low advisory bullishness figures provide little evidence for a «contrary opinion» call on the market.

«We are very happy that Singles Day has become the consumers» day in China,» Zhang said, calling the not - yet - final event results «very solid evidence for the power of Chinese consumers.»

CJ — Belief in things without evidence (things which are hoped for but not seen) is called faith.

Another kind of faith, you may call it that if you want, is the substance of things that have substance and the evidence of things we know and of things that have worked for us in the past.

He called the arguments for a «strong natural disposition to believe in gods...» a «mounting body of scientific evidence.»

I actually do find evidence supporting Christianity and God in general throughout history, mathematics, and science, but you will call me blind nonetheless because you adore grouping people together to discriminate against them for actually comprehending something you can not fathom.

De Waal recently published a book called «The Bonobo and the Atheist: In Search of Humanism Among the Primates,» which synthesizes evidence that there are biological roots in human fairness, and explores what that means for the role of religion in human societieIn Search of Humanism Among the Primates,» which synthesizes evidence that there are biological roots in human fairness, and explores what that means for the role of religion in human societiein human fairness, and explores what that means for the role of religion in human societiein human societies.

Short finds no evidence of explicit complaints against the demands of motherhood in the 18th century, nor any foreshadowing of a call for «reproductive rights».

For a response to so - called «gaps» in the fossil record, check out this excerpt from Richard Dawkin's new book, The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for EvolutioFor a response to so - called «gaps» in the fossil record, check out this excerpt from Richard Dawkin's new book, The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolutiofor Evolution.)

If you hold that no human death came before sinfulness, then it depends on what you call human (there is a gradation of forms leading up to the modern human skeleton in the fossil record, as well as the overwhelming genetic evidence that we arose through an evolutionary process) and what you consider sin (i.e. when did we become accountable to God for our actions?).

In fact, Dawkins book was called the BLIND watchmaker for that very fact, as he argues the OPPOSITE... that in fact the design shows clear evidence of natural selection, not of a creatoIn fact, Dawkins book was called the BLIND watchmaker for that very fact, as he argues the OPPOSITE... that in fact the design shows clear evidence of natural selection, not of a creatoin fact the design shows clear evidence of natural selection, not of a creator.

In the very next paragraph he says: «The only source of evidence for God is immediate experience, what I have elsewhere called the «datum self»....

I find it very telling when people who believe in things for which they only have anecdotal evidence call people who demand proof «closed minded».

For my part, when I look at the way events unfold in the world, I do not see any evidence there of the kind of divine activity called for by the Whiteheadian notion of God's consequent nature weaving itself across his primordial nature and then returning the «superjective» vision back to the world in an operative, effective manner through the shaping of subjective aiFor my part, when I look at the way events unfold in the world, I do not see any evidence there of the kind of divine activity called for by the Whiteheadian notion of God's consequent nature weaving itself across his primordial nature and then returning the «superjective» vision back to the world in an operative, effective manner through the shaping of subjective aifor by the Whiteheadian notion of God's consequent nature weaving itself across his primordial nature and then returning the «superjective» vision back to the world in an operative, effective manner through the shaping of subjective aims.

To do that we have to establish a way to prove an assumption by: 1) asserting a hypothesis and its components 2) testing the components for substantial supporting evidence, unsupported components go back to be refined 3) either agree after successful testing that in our shared reality the hypothesis is now supported, or that overall unsupported components may mean the hypothesis fails 4) for sake of ease many people call these tested and supported hypotheses «facts», but again that's just so that we can get on with progress.

Some of the evidence for this I have put together in the appendix of another book called The Abolition of Man; but for our present purpose I need only ask the reader to think what a totally different morality would mean.

If the evidence required us to assume that the earliest beings we call human did in fact embody this structure of existence, then we would have to posit exceedingly high levels of mentality in our prehuman ancestors, assuming that for hundreds of thousands of years they must have far more closely approximated our contemporary existence than does any now existing nonhuman member of the simian family.

Examples are 9/11 hijackings, The holding back of stem cell research that could save countless human lives, Aids being spread due to religious opposition to the use of condoms, Christians legally fighting this year to teach over 1 million young girls in America that they must always be obedient to men, the eroding of child protection laws in America by Christians, for so called faith based healing alternatives that place children's health and safety at risk, burning of witches, the crusades, The Nazi belief that the Aryans were god's chosen to rule the world, etc... But who cares about evidence in the real world when we have our imaginations and delusions about gods with no evidence of them existing.

Yes, in the sense that there could now be some basic agreement upon just what criteria, what methods of inquiry, what modes of argumentation, what evidence would count for that public community of inquirers called theologians.

derp, I'm wondering if you have read the book by Dr. Stephen Myers called «Signature in the Cell» which argues that specifically encoded DNA strands store information in a precise and logical manner which provides some evidence that an argument for intelligent design is present?

Call me crazy but i'll take the mountain of evidence that is demanded in order for a theory to be accepted over the complete lack of evidence that is religion.

in spite of their testimony or maybe because of their testimony you choose to call them all liars.All that is being said is that there is evidence for the truth of the Bible in archaeology with amazing accuracy.

If prayers can be shown to more often result in the desired change than can be expected from random chance, you will have found evidence for a force that you then can call god (or Pink Unicorn).

Lanzetta's magnum opus is a passionate and well - argued and evidenced call for the Second Vatican Council to be read within a hermeneutic of continuity in the Church of the two millennia; and something more: for various questions consciously left open by the Fathers now to be addressed, from a pastoral concern for integral truth.

but i didn't state anything example — i stated that the theory of evolution is yet to be proved and so with that i agree that due to that lacking it is equal to the theory of god... the only thing i said which is cemented truth for anything is that we don't know what the real answer is... and by stating ideas as facts serves no real purpose but a selfish one... lets call it an ease - ment on the inner self, the mind can now be at peace with the hope that when i die i get to live yet again... full belief in this is insane without evidence.

Here's the majors, so plan accordingly for your place in this life or the next: 1) there is not a single fossil to evidence mankind's evolution from some so - called earlier form (see missing link) however we do however have mountains of DNA evidence showing we have common ancestors with primates — so you either believe in a Creator, or Aliens, or actual evolution or a mix of any of the three.

I guess under Judge Martin's brilliant legal analysis, if the gun - toting, bible - beatin» Christians of his county find his ruling «offensive» they can just bring their pitchforks and remove him from the bench, and then in any subsequent prosecution all evidence will be thrown out and Judge Martin can be called a «doofus» for making a ruling that offends them.

Yet nuns and other women who insist that they have a call to the priesthood and use their pain as evidence for an authentic interior call from God are, in fact, using the protean politics of pain and not Catholic theology to explain their experiences.

Far from being a disparagement of the family, this statement of utter devotion to God in terms of surrendering family ties, when that is called for, is evidence of Jesus» supreme estimate of the family, as the value most difficult for a man to give up.)

I think it's funny that you call yourself «common sense» yet you cling to belief in a god for which there is no evidence.

While the evidence for such a proposition remains tentative, its tentativeness calls into question the certainty with which paid - time religious broadcasters assert that their efforts in competing on the basis recognized by the television industry (i.e., financial competence) have been responsible for increasing the amount of religious programming on television.

Over nine years, Desbois and his ecumenical organization, Yahad — In Unum have searched for evidence of what Desbois calls the «Holocaust by bullets.»

Environment Secretary Michael Gove has launched a call for evidence on how reward and return schemes for beverage containers in England could help to tackle the nation's littering problem.

The growing evidence of the negative health effects of sugar sweetened drinks has led to calls for action to limit consumption.1 2 Several options exist, including controls on the marketing of sugar sweetened drinks, limits on portion sizes, and taxation.3 In the United Kingdom, the sale of sugar sweetened drinks in schools and their advertisement during children's television is banneIn the United Kingdom, the sale of sugar sweetened drinks in schools and their advertisement during children's television is bannein schools and their advertisement during children's television is banned.

4 December 2013 Industry calls for commonsense and evidence in energy drink debate The Australian Beverages Council, representing the Australian energy drink industry, has called on Albury Council to adopt a commonsense approach backed by evidence in the debate over energy drinks.

21 July 2016 MEDIA RELEASE Energy drink bans unnecessary, unwarranted and not supported by the evidence The Australian Beverages Council, representing the local energy drinks industry, has today rejected calls for age restrictions on the purchase of energy drinks that appeared in a recent article on www.news.com.

Not all of the fish used in seviche is cubed, as evidenced by this popular recipe that calls for fish fillets.

«In order for us to overturn the call, we had to see clearly indisputable evidence,» Riveron said.

Payton signaled for two coaches» challenges in a four - play span despite having no replay evidence to suggest officials had botched either call.

Whether he stays or goes this is in large part a media fabrication story without what could be called substantive evidence — they've sold papers off the back of this for months.