Sentences with phrase «call opinion evidence»

Not exact matches

In short, aside from some potential for a «clearing rally» to correct the short - term oversold condition of the market, even the low advisory bullishness figures provide little evidence for a «contrary opinion» call on the market.

Giving reasons to support their call for the procedure to be halted, Mr. Charles Bentum was also of the opinion that the judges should have been given prior access to the video evidence.

The authors» repeated and unusual use of the word «recrudescence» when referring to home birth, which reveals their perception of the choice as a disease or disorder, and their stubborn contempt for high - quality evidence if it disproves their opinion, exposes their intent and certainly calls into question their «integrity.»

And I was not dissapointed by how clear cut his opinion was on the subject... In his article evidence on nut consumption and human health he goes so far as to call Dr. Esselstyn a reductionist for dissaproving the healthy fats from nuts and advocado's!

In short, aside from some potential for a «clearing rally» to correct the short - term oversold condition of the market, even the low advisory bullishness figures provide little evidence for a «contrary opinion» call on the market.

Bern: «And even then, I'd only consider calling Dr Hansen a «charlatan» if he stuck with his current predictions of imminent strong warming and never once changed his opinion, despite evidence to the contrary.»

He is also called upon to provide expert evidence opinions in real estate litigation matters.

Further, one of her medical witnesses at trial expressed doubts about the extent of her pain and the court found that other medical witnesses called by the plaintiff based their opinions largely on the subjective complaints by the plaintiff as opposed to objective evidence.

This case is a great reminder of the need to comply with Rule 40 - A if you are advancing an ICBC injury claim in Supreme Court and wish to call expert evidence to give the court an opinion about injuries, causation, future treatment, and prognosis.

[12] In any event, the proposed evidence is also truly responsive as a rebuttal to the opinion of another expert witness called by the CN defendants, Dr. Baker, whose report entered at Tab 1 of Exhibit 61 states:

In today's case (MacEachern v. Rennie) the Defendants called a physician to give expert opinion evidence.

Leading case describing judge's task in deciding whether to admit so - called expert opinion into evidence based on scientific validity and applicability to the case; whether the science has been tested and subject to peer review and publication; and what the rate of error is.

Of course the next obvious question is why didn't the plaintiff lawyers call the regulatory College (CPO) to confirm that this «opposing expert» was in fact properly qualified to proffer neuropsychological opinion evidence for the defence in brain injury cases?

In the wave of criticism since the case was handed down, Sirota has called the court's opinion an «unmaking» and «disparagement of history» and the court's take on the historical evidence «bizarre.»

These defendants questioned the validity of the so called expert reports, brought as evidence against them, mainly on the basis that they deemed these experts insufficiently qualified to make judgements on the matter, and stated that their opinions were not properly explained.

«The risks associated with calling the expert opinion evidence of a «hired gun» - that is to say, an expert whose opinions are not independent and impartial but are easily adapted to the requirements of the party that calls him or her - are obvious.