Sentences with phrase «call option means»

Because the existence of the implied call option means that demand «normally» would have pulled the index above 4,500, and was only prevented from doing so by the implied call itself.

Not exact matches

«But while it's a hard one to call, they could put an asset test on it — meaning employee stock options would be taxed more heavily for those employees who work for big public companies with a large asset base, like the Big Five banks.

In the final quarter of 2016, Einhorn also added 25 million call options of GM valued at $ 871 million — meaning he bet the stock would rise.

But even here, risk management for us takes the form of diversification, while the use of call options (rather than margin) means that the effect of any leverage would be limited to the few percent paid for those calls.

Lower levels of implied volatility mean less income from each call option sold.

It comes following calls by the president for Republican lawmakers to immediately pass a border bill, even if it means using the «nuclear option» to muscle it through.

You spend $ 5,000 on this option, and purchase a call option — meaning you think the price will be above $ 500 when the contract expires.

With gold now at $ 1,233.40 per ounce, that option is currently priced around $ 42.30 per ounce, meaning it would cost you $ 4,230 for a minimum purchase of a single June 2012 call option [The minimum purchase would be options on one 100 - ounce contract: The option priced at $ 42.30 per ounce x the 100 ounces in the contract = the $ 4,230 outlay].

The June 2012 $ 2,300 call is priced at $ 28.40 per ounce, meaning it would cost $ 2,840 for one option.

It expands on a popular new way of trading binary options called «social trading»; which basically means you don't do any technical analysis yourself; you just mimic the trades of other more experienced and consistently profitable binary options traders.

That was the dilemma after praying and seeking the Lord he shows me a couple of things one is God calls the shots not satan satans demons bow to Gods authority and must get his permission so they beg Jesus to send the demons into the pigs.Jesus allows it so we can see satans purpose is always to destroy life.God is still the same yesterday today and forever he is the giver of life.We do know that the pigs were owned by the gentile nations and may well have been offered or about to be offered to there gods which would mean they would belong to satan.Like the example Jesus said about taxes should he pay them and he said give to caesar what is caesars.Or the other option was that it showed Gods mercy to the man that had been healed by delivering him of the demons and he was also protecting the people in the area from the influence of the demons.So God is still the same he is unchangeable and definitely not bipolar.I would say if anyone was bipolar in this situation it is David and he like us struggled with the same choice to walk according to the flesh or walk according to the spirit of God.brentnz

If Goldman is right, the literal option at this age level almost guarantees rejection of both story and meaning when the student moves into puberty (unless his mental development is arrested at what Piaget calls the concrete operational level).

«One of the saddest moments during my time as Education Secretary was the day I took a call from a wonderfully generous philanthropist who had devoted limitless time and money to helping educate disadvantaged children in some of the most challenging areas of Britain but who now felt he had no option but to step away from his commitments because his evangelical Christianity meant that he, and his generosity, were under constant attack.»

There are very few vegan options out there, and while I could theoretically buy certain store - bought mixes and use oil and flax eggs instead of the butter and eggs that the instructions call for, usually the ingredient list is way too long for me to decipher (which means it's made with some nasty artificial ingredients).

What you mean the same player that AW didn't deem worthy of a place in his team until recently and who he loaned out to Charlton only to call him back because he had no other option?

If we make a bid for one player it does not mean we do nt want another player... thats called common sense by keeping options open Players are made available or put in transfer requests at various times during the season and for many reasons... eg PSG buy neymar for stupid money and so Barca noe have a huge pot to make bids for people previously unavailable and so on... At times it seems as though some of you have never watched football before or a transfer window!!!

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

But he did concede that the so - called «Max Fac» option would not mean trade with the EU was completely fluid.

The analysis Now FactCheck has looked at the Labour option for a so - called «death tax» - a means tested compulsory contribution towards your social care costs paid at point of death.

Sifting through all of the possibilities for an 11 - set diagram would be an impossible task even for the combined might of Earth's computers, so the researchers narrowed the options by restricting the search to diagrams with a property called crosscut symmetry, meaning that a segment of each set crosses all the other sets exactly once.

The Islwyn Inn is exactly the type of all - round date venue that means you'll always have an option to call on.

The administration would devote $ 1 billion in Title I dollars meant for poor children to a new grant program (called Furthering Options for Children to Unlock Success, or FOCUS) for school districts that agree to allow students to choose which public school they attend — and take their federal, state and local dollars with them.

Nissan offers no factory options for the Juke NISMO and NISMO RS, which means each includes a NissanConnect with Mobile Apps infotainment system, which includes a 5.8 - inch touchscreen, a navigation system, a USB port, Bluetooth calling and music streaming, a text messaging assistant, Siri Eyes Free technology, satellite radio, and a reversing camera.

The new truck, called the JT, will share its engine choices with the Wrangler, which means we expect a 285 - horsepower V6 will be the base option, while a 2.0 - liter turbocharged four - cylinder engine with 270 hp and 295 lb - ft of torque will be the upgraded choice.

Being hybrid means grabbing hold of those options that are available to me and using them to my advantage — whether it's going traditional, having print only deals, getting foreign rights, audio rights... doesn't matter — it's seeing beyond the box called «Indie Publishing» and realizing there are no lines for me to cross — as long as I don't see them.

My first book is called «Dead and Buryd», and when I was writing it and had it at the finished stage (by that I mean I was finished with it — I couldn't go any further without the input of an editor or agent), I started looking around at my options.

BlackBerry has always had decent universal search, but in BB10.3 it integrates with BlackBerry Assistant too, meaning you can quickly add a calendar event or reminder just by typing a few short commands — typing, «Cal,» for instance, brings up options for both calling people and adding calendar appointments.

There is, however, an option available for some students called student loan forgiveness — which means they don't have to pay their student loans back.

He finds that the January $ 27.50 put option (meaning a put option expires in January with a strike price of $ 27.50) is trading at $ 2.95, and the January $ 35 call option is trading at $ 2.

A positive delta means that the option position will rise in value if the stock price rises, and fall in value if the stock price falls (usually a call).

In such case, for example, when I buy a call option, do you mean the premium I pay to buy the option now and the difference between striking price and the market price at maturity date do not go to the same party, because the latter may go to a randomly chosen someone different from the one I buy the option from?

That means that (1) you receive $ 15 / share in cash today, and (2) in 2 months time you will either lose your stock at $ 90 (plus the $ 15 you got today, for a total of $ 105 / share), buy back the call options (and perhaps sell others), or keep your stock and have the options expire worthless (if the stock is below $ 90 on option expiration day).

More open interest is better, because it means there is more liquidity for the call option you are trading.

Option exercise is common when implementing a covered call strategy and is no big deal; it just means you receive cash for your stock, and now you can take that cash and go buy more stock (or you could party like a rockstar, or hire a personal fitness trainer; your choice).

For example, if today (August 10, 2017) I purchase one call for EWQ7, does this mean that at 4:00 p.m. ET on the last business day of this month I have the right (let's ignore that contrarian instructions are forbidden for weekly & end - of - month options) to purchase the corresponding ESU6?

Sometimes covered call writers will be subject to early exercise (meaning, the buyer of the option will exercise his right to purchase your stock before the option expiration date) just so they can capture the dividend.

Above $ 20, the investor keeps the premium income of $ 4 as well as a $ 5 profit from the long call option, but loses out on any upside above $ 20 as the short position means the stock will be called away from him or her.

If the stock is over $ 50 on option expiration day then the person who bought your call option will exercise it — meaning they will buy your stock from you for $ 50 / share.

For call options, «in the money» means the strike price is lower than the current stock value.

To purchase a call option with a strike price of $ 35 means placing a bet that the underlying stock price will increase to at least $ 35 per share before a certain date.

Yes, as I described earlier, when I called them originally, I took the option to keep the 2 % minimum payment even though it would mean a higher interest rate.

Call options are a bullish investment vehicle, meaning the buyer believes the stock price will increase.

So, at best, exercising a call early and then selling the stock means throwing away the time value of the option, so in those rare cases where time value is zero, it should be a wash to exercise and sell, and in all other cases, you'd be worse off, since you'd only capture the intrinsic difference between the stock's price and the strike price.

Most brokers, and in my case thinkorswim, allow defined risk trading, meaning you can trade almost any option and spread except naked short Calls and short stock.

Better option premiums and yields, combined with struggling equities and rising bond yields means now could potentially be the time for covered calls.

Lower levels of implied volatility mean less income from each call option sold.

For example, say you wanted to leave yourself 10 % upside potential (meaning you don't want to lose your stocks unless they appreciate by more than 10 % between today and option expiration), you could sell these covered calls which are all 10 % out of the money:

Next, both investors who bought the $ 55.00 call options decide to exercise their options, meaning our original investor has to sell them 200 shares at $ 55.00, for a total of $ 11,000.00.

The whole idea here is that you sell call options that are «out - of - the - money», meaning that the strike price is above the current exercise price.

First of all, it means that even after the options expire, you will still own the underlying security, meaning you can reassess the situation and potentially execute the covered call strategy a second time.