The National Trust has prepared a slideshow that gives some good tips on how to save what
they call ugly buildings, that make a lot of sense.
Not exact matches
So let me get this straight: Your company is circling the drain, your latest console was a flop, your first - party software comes out way too infrequently and even when it does it's not nearly as good as it used to be, and all you've really got going for you is an awkward, no - one - ever - mentions - wanting - one hand - held gaming device that does 3D at the expense of having graphics one could even possibly
call modern in 2013, and so you decide to spend your time
building a new version of said hand - held system which does not do that unique 3D feature and instead is big,
ugly, clunky and only $ 40 USD cheaper than the 3D version which is
ugly too but less so?
Called the Carbuncle Cup, it's a race to the bottom to decide upon the
ugliest new
building in Britain.
Call them weird Germans, call them obsessive, but do not call their buildings u
Call them weird Germans,
call them obsessive, but do not call their buildings u
call them obsessive, but do not
call their buildings u
call their
buildings ugly.
When then National Trust for Historic Preservation titled this slideshow «How to save
ugly buildings» I thought, who you
calling ugly?
Two years ago we wrote about Green Sandwich panels; then a year ago about BASF's spectacularly
ugly Near Zero Energy Home, promoting their version of a green sandwich panel; now Studio RMA has taken the technology and
built what one could truly
call a new Case Study House, combining new technology with some classic California modernist design, and aiming for LEED Platinum.