Sentences with phrase «called carbon capture»

A process called carbon capture and storage can theoretically be used to catch the CO2 and put it in underground reservoirs where it will stay for many years.

It's called carbon capture and storage.

Adding to the gloom, an allied technology called carbon capture and utilization (CCU)- which makes use of captured CO2, rather than storing it underground - was reported yesterday to be many years from fruition, in a study from the UK's Center for Low Carbon Futures.

Sequestration, as applied to the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide (CO2)(also called carbon capture and storage; CCS), is the storage of carbon dioxide, or the carbon content of the carbon dioxide, in a sink.

One possible alternative is called carbon capture and storage, meaning that we would capture the CO2 from the use of fossil fuels and pump the CO2 underground.

However, these so - called carbon capture and storage, or CCS systems, require modifications to existing power plant technologies.

One option is called carbon capture and sequestration, which involves capturing carbon dioxide from power plants before it is released into the atmosphere and storing it in underground caves.

From GreenGen in Tianjin, China, to the Edwardsport facility in Edwardsport, Ind., power plants are beginning to be built with so - called carbon capture and storage (CCS)-- technology that captures the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide (CO2) and locks it away from the atmosphere.

These findings, published today in the journal Nature Communications, demonstrate the viability of a process called carbon capture and storage (CCS) as a solution to reducing carbon emissions from coal and gas - fired power stations, say researchers.

The technology, called carbon capture and storage, or CCS, collects planet - warming carbon pollution produced by power plants and permanently removes it from circulation.

It also says technology to capture carbon from power plants and other industrial facilities — so - called carbon capture and storage — needs support in order to encourage large - scale projects.

The amount of released CO2 that Shenhua has prevented seems small, but it is a symbol of China's continuing efforts to develop a cutting - edge technology it calls carbon capture, utilization and storage, or CCUS.

Not exact matches

Stuart Haszeldine, a professor of carbon capture and storage at the University of Edinburgh who did not participate in the study, called the new work encouraging, as it indicates escaped CO2 is not likely to have a perceptible impact, even in a worst - case scenario of poor site selection and leaky wells.

With what EPRI calls a «full» portfolio of technology options, including new nuclear, expanded wind power and carbon capture, the price of electricity in current dollars would climb by 80 percent in 2050.

He called ethanol the «low - hanging fruit» for carbon capture.

As a result, roughly 50 percent of the captured carbon sinks through the so - called twilight zone there — perhaps because it is heavier and therefore descends faster — compared with just 20 percent in the balmier waters off Hawaii, which support smaller life - forms, researchers report this week in Science.

Chinese utility company Huaneng and U.S. company Duke Energy Corp. signed a cooperation agreement this year calling for a study to determine the feasibility of applying Huaneng's carbon capture process at Duke Energy's coal - fired power plant in Indiana.

The Department of Energy is aiming to kick - start the technology with a project called FutureGen, a $ 1 billion pilot IGCC plant that will have integrated carbon - capture and storage technology — a true zero - emissions plant.

Millet is a so - called C4 plant, which has a very efficient photosynthetic system for capturing carbon dioxide, whereas most other plants that grow in northern China are less efficient C3 plants.

Opportunity has a dark side, however: in the past, the increased demand tempted growers to clear natural forests and replace them with bamboo — a practice Ruiz - Pérez calls «completely crazy» from an environmental standpoint, because it erodes biodiversity and reduces the carbon capture benefits.

Other higher - tech options include using chemicals to absorb CO2 from the air, or burning plants for energy and capturing the CO2 that would otherwise be released, then storing it permanently deep below the ground, called bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS).

@raydowe - The carbon by - product is called carbon dioxide, and if the ethanol is from biological sources the carbon dioxide has in the fuel production stage been captured from the atmosphere, so there are no net carbon dioxide emissions.

In particular, these models love a technology called «bioenergy carbon capture and sequestration (BECCS)» because it has negative emissions — you grow biomass, harvest it and burn it for electricity, and then store the pollution underground.

• Leads global sector public financing towards cleaner energy by calling for the end of U.S. government support for public financing of new coal - fired powers plants overseas, except for the most efficient coal technology available in the world's poorest countries, or facilities deploying carbon capture and sequestration technologies; and

Patented technology captures carbon dioxide from power plants Researchers from UCSC and... LLNL coinventor Gregory Rau... with UCSC's Institute of Marine Sciences... and LLNL researcher Ken Caldeira... carbon sequestration method, called Accelerated Weathering of Limestone http://currents.ucsc.edu/04-05/06-06/emissions.asp

Reflecting that situation, the White House has maintained a bullish stance on carbon capture and storage (or sequestration), which it continues to call a «clean coal» technology.

Rudolph W. Giuliani called for moving from energy rhetoric to action, using the popular Republican phrasing «clean coal,» a phrase with no meaning in the climate context until someone comes up with a cheap way to capture and store carbon dioxide emitted by power plants on the scale of billions of tons a year.

Interestingly, Mr. Gore appeared to put himself at odds with Mr. Obama by including an outright rejection of what Big Coal and both presidential candidates call «clean coal» — burning the fossil fuel but capturing and burying the resulting carbon dioxide.

Speaking at the Fall 2015 meeting of the American Chemical Society in Boston, Berkeley Lab and University of California at Berkeley chemist Omar Yaghi, the inventor of MOFs, described the use of another technology he pioneered, «reticular chemistry,» to produce a series of compounds called «IRMOF -74-III,» which are effective for selective carbon dioxide capture in the presence of water.

Matt Lucas, associate director of carbon capture, utilization and storage technology at the Center for Carbon Removal, called the updated credits a «pull» mechanism directly analogous to the Investment Tax Credit and the Production Tax Credit.

Jenkins called it a «technology - neutral market pull» to bring carbon capture projects to the fore.

In the absence of clear, national policy on climate change — aside from the current administration's tendency to ignore it or call it a hoax — CCS advocates said carbon capture gives power to the private sector until the time is right.

And closer study of biomass burning is calling into question the «carbon - neutral» assumption: that growing wood or other biomass captures the same amount of CO2 that subsequent burning for electricity generation releases.

To reconcile China's need for more cheap energy with its climate goals, the plan calls for a major pilot project to study carbon capture and sequestration, a technology intended to capture carbon dioxide from coal plants and either bury it underground or repackage it for use as an industrial chemical.

Hyperlocal architecture captures concepts such as resilience, zero carbon, and regenerative, terms Michler calls aspirational architecture, and turns them into grounded and provocative fully realized forms.

As part of his climate change initiative announced in June, President Obama declared, «Today I'm calling for an end of public financing for new coal plants overseas unless they deploy carbon capture technologies, or there's no other viable way for the poorest countries to generate electricity.»

I like to call it techno - hope because the problem remains that carbon capture and storage (CCS) on a commercial scale is still far off in the future, if attainable at all.

A bipartisan group of U.S. senators has announced plans to reintroduce legislation called the FUTURE Act, which would extend and expand the federal 45Q tax credit for carbon dioxide capture and sequestration.

While there is a lot of skepticism over so - called «clean coal» technologies, which look to capture and store carbon emissions, a major government and industry initiative is about to take a small step closer to testing some of that controversial and cutting - edge technology.

Achieving negative emissions will involve what the analysis calls «the deployment of uncertain and at present controversial technologies, including biomass energy with carbon capture and storage.»

Goldman Sachs (GS, Fortune 500) has invested alongside a carbon project developer called Natsource to capture potent industrial gases from chemical plants in China.

But to win money from the newly - available federal Clean Coal Power Initiative, Southern now promised to also use TRIG to capture most of the plant's carbon dioxide, which would be compressed and piped out to older underproducing oil fields and injected into the ground to drive more oil to the surface — a process called enhanced oil recovery.

This is called «carbon capture and sequestration,» or CCS.

While there is continued emphasis on developing «Carbon Capture and Sequestration» to ensure a continued life for Somewhat Less Dirty Coal (euphemistically called «Clean Coal «-RRB-, there are win - win - win options for geoengineering and carbon capture, like biochar, that merit far greater attention and active pCapture and Sequestration» to ensure a continued life for Somewhat Less Dirty Coal (euphemistically called «Clean Coal «-RRB-, there are win - win - win options for geoengineering and carbon capture, like biochar, that merit far greater attention and active pcapture, like biochar, that merit far greater attention and active pursuit.

Power industry officials, however, claim they can limit emissions by building so - called clean coal plants and systems for capturing carbon.

In a classic Catch - 22, negotiators in a key advisory body that was expected to provide guidance on scientific and technical matters (the so - called «Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice ``, or SBSTA) said they couldn't offer any advice on the best way to measure and evaluate the amount of carbon captured by changes in land use practices until they had a better idea of what the overriding post-Kyoto policies might look like.

That means seeking what the treaty calls a «balance» between sources of carbon like the burning of coal, oil and natural gas, and its absorption from the atmosphere by forest growth, or, possibly, techniques like capturing emissions of CO2 and burying them in the ground.

Ending dependency on dirty energy includes avoiding dangerous and unproven so - called solutions like nuclear, carbon capture and storage, and geo - engineering.

Identifying a way forward for the industry to minimise CO2 emissions was a strong theme, as various speakers called for acceleration of technological advancement, such as carbon capture and storage (CCS).

Carbon Offsets (also called Carbon Credits) provide your business with a verified method to balance your unavoidable carbon footprint by directly supporting innovative projects (such as agricultural methane capture) that are proven to reduce carbon emissions.