Sentences with phrase «called certain people»

So the question would be if they called certain people names, does that give us the right to do so?

God has called certain people to this very task, but in a spiritual war, not a physical one.

If you are not part of an adoption triad, ask the people you know who are what they prefer to call certain people and events.

Not exact matches

In the 1930s, about a decade after Polish biochemist Casimir Funk first recommended people get enough of certain micronutrients called «vitamines» (later found in abundance in citrus fruits and veggies), the first grapefruit diet emerged, followed by a banana - and - skim - milk diet promoted by United Fruit, the planet's leading banana importer.

Certain situations call for specialized knowledge that many people, and for that matter many professionals, don't have.

When people call certain service companies — realtors, pest control, movers and the like — they are essentially dialing 911.

April 2010 — four senators call on Facebook to change its policies after it announces a product called Instant Personalization — which automatically hands over some user data to certain third - party sites as soon as a person visits them.

First - time homebuyers or persons who have not owned a principal interest in a residence in the past 3 years; Certain areas of the state, called «Target Areas», are exempt from the «first - time homebuyer» rule.

* Acts 8:9 But there was a certain man, called Simon, which befortime in the same city used sorcery, and bewitched the people of Samaria, giving out that himself was some great one: * St. John 7:18 He that speaketh of himself seeketh his own glory: * Isaiah 10:11 Shall I not, as I have done unto Samaria and her idols, so do to Jerusalem and her idols?

Now it's time to recognize this fact and allow all people to be equal and not undermine the calibre of certain castes by calling them weak or underdeveloped and by reserving government jobs for them.

That said, the people that are likely to exist in what my self sees as a world which is likely to exist may agree on certain statements that they may call truth, but how am I ever to truly know?

It is good procedure for the minister to phone the hospital in advance of a call to ascertain whether the medical staff feels that the person should have visitors at a certain stage in his recovery.

Name calling and denial of civil rights, oppression, and manipulation of people seems to be the hallmark of a certain strain of religion.

It existed to fulfill certain laws of God, and when it failed to do this faithfully, it could be called to task by the people.

Yet the central - state materialist replies that images are not really spatial entities of any kind at all except perhaps in appearance — they are the way in which certain brain processes appear to the material system which we call a person and whose brain it is.

His descriptions of the talmudic passages wherein certain people are explicitly condemned to hell are certainly consistent with what C. S. Lewis calls the maledictory Psalms that, for example, bless those who dash out the brains of Babylonian babies (Psalm 9).

Or does the human have certain inherent characteristics and external influences which call for a more cautious estimation of each person's responsibility for moral behavior?

There are certain people who call themselves Christians who are not at all possible of being Christians.

In particular, the denial that epistemology is wholly prior to ontology; the denial that we can have an absolutely certain starting point; the idea that those elements of experience thought by most people to be primitive givens are in fact physiologically, personally, and socially constructed; the idea that all of our descriptions of our observations involve culturally conditioned interpretations; the idea that our interpretations, and the focus of our conscious attention, are conditioned by our purposes; the idea that the so - called scientific method does not guarantee neutral, purely objective, truths; and the idea that most of our ideas do not correspond to things beyond ourselves in any simple, straightforward way (for example, red as we see it does not exist in the «red brick» itself).

They know about the anti-Jewish polemics of certain church fathers; about the forced baptisms, especially of children; about the church council decree that sanctioned the removal of such children from their parents; about a papal edict encouraging raids on Jewish synagogues by the faithful; about the expulsion of all Jews from a country like Spain; about Luther's hate language directed against Jews when they did not convert according to his timetable; about the prohibition against Jews living in Calvin's Geneva; and about all the cruelties Christians have felt justified in perpetrating against the people they called «Christ - killers.»

Strong atheism is sometimes called «gnostic atheism» because people who take this position often incorporate knowledge claims into it — that is to say, they claim to know in some fashion that certain gods or indeed all gods do not or can not exist.

But these gifts are used today when missionaries are sent to unreached people groups, or when certain people call the church to repent and return to a proper way of living with God.

Each one who knows himself... as called to a work which he has not done, each one who has not fulfilled a task which he knows to be his own, each who did not remain faithful to his vocation which he had become certain of — each such person knows what it means to say that «his conscience smites him.»

I know that God does know the future and He will allow certain individuals into heaven — I also know that a large number of people think this is pie in the sky stuff; however, since He did make that place then why would He not allow some people to enjoy the place called heaven.

This is the United States of America based on a certain belief and I myself am tired of catering to every call from every group of people that have a cause.

The accounts of the «calling» of disciples are bald, and less informative than we might wish, but it stands firm that Jesus called upon certain persons to cut loose from home, family and livelihood and commit themselves to an insecure and precarious existence — and all for the sake of a cause which they only dimly understood — and that they responded.

I hate people who try to force people to live their lives a certain way, but when you have the audacity to call them out they accuse you of oppressing them.

The purpose rather is to call up Paul Ricoeur's reflection on why we pay attention when certain people speak and why we find what they say convincing: «The term testimony should be applied to words, works, actions, and to lives which attest to an intention, an inspiration, an idea at the heart of experience and history which nonetheless transcend experience and history.»

After my family, and what amounts to be a small church full of people, were maliciously harmed by Christian leaders of a certain theological and denominational bent (despite an uproarious public outcry calling these leaders to account and condemning their actions), I find myself recoiling when this particular denominational group is mentioned.

I don't judge people — I will call into question ideas and theologies — but I will not call into question a certain person (unless he has broken the law and needs to answer for that — or has wronged someone and needs to make that right — to that person).

It is apparent that prophecy was thus not a personal choice, but something to which one was called; only certain persons were psychologically capable of such trances.

For it is only upon the vision of each person as called to enter into communion with God and others that certain supports and freedoms which allow and enable Man's response accrue to him - i.e. «rights».

I've learned that just because people want me to serve in certain ways doesn't mean that's where God is calling me to serve.

Jesus invites all men to come unto him, not just a select few ~ Religion what some love to call religiosity are ideas, religious beliefs that are confined to a certain group of people.

For example people can call entrepreneurs a little bit nuts (good nuts), because they believe in a certain goal without proof.

I think there are certain people gifted in evangelism and called to, for a lack of a better term, «cold evangelism», or, giving the gospel to people they don't know.

Thus the spectacle of persons in Stalin's Russia willingly confessing deeds or words they never committed or spoke, not out of guilt or masochism but out of loyalty to the necessities of the movement's logic which has called for a certain kind of crime to be committed and confessed at a particular point in history.

I find it difficult to believe God / Jesus would approve of tattoos but whatever, the amount of people who are truly christian is very low anyhow, If you ask me the desire to tattoo religious imagery onto yourself is quite shallow / conceited and I'm almost certain these people are just pretending to be something they're not in an effort to fit in or be «cool», like the majority of so - called «Christians» Jesus will turn away from them and will «profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.»

When people decide to band together and call themselves by a certain name, they attempt to gather enough power to expand and survive.

The Bible does not condemn people for things that they can't change about themselves, but we all have the ability to control our behavior and not commit certain acts that are called out as being sinful.

To some people, certain aspects of the message that I call gospel will sound more like theological gobbledygook.

Would we respond to this call in a self - aggrandizing way, certain that God loves us more than other people?

Holmes is positing the existence of a certain kind of person to explain observed phenomena (not, as he habitually says, making deductions), but we would not normally call his conclusions science, even when true and convincing.

(That the transaction of opening ourselves, otherwise called prayer, is a perfectly definite one for certain persons, appears abundantly in the preceding lectures.

If he suspects that a certain individual is hurting, he can make himself more psychologically accessible to that person by means of a series of pastoral calls.

«People call in ahead of time to request it for lunch because we only make a certain number a day.»

Certain carbohydrates called «FODMAPs» can be hard to digest and cause some people's stomachs to feel all wrong.

Called this after Lacazette deal, yet certain people on this forum couldn't stop posting Lemar rumours and a bunch of other nonsense.

He certainly seems to be thoroughly angry with the «ignorant people» who are calling for Wenger's head and is certain that the Board will not be listening to the «few hotheads»,... Read the full article here

Look, whatever you guys believe and theres a lot of back biting and name calling on her especially from certain people who belive that derision of others opionions is the way forway, IT was may be schneiderlin is coming to us an equally possible that he wont be.