Sentences with phrase «called false negative»

First, the test sometimes is wrong and your puppy is positive, this is called a false negative, and happens 8 - 10 % of the time.

This is the case in what is called false negative results: the test looks normal but it is deceiving.

At her first OBGYN appointment for her pregnancy, this woman and her husband may be surprised to learn that she was already 10 weeks pregnant, with the previous results having been what is called a false negative pregnancy test.

The biggest problem with eHarmony especially is, what I call the False Negative Problem.

Not exact matches

About 10 percent to 15 percent of people have so - called «false - negative» blood test results (negative blood test results but a positive biopsy) even when they're eating a gluten - filled diet, according to Dr. Alessio Fasano, head of the Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Celiac Research.

This is called a «false negative» test result.

I know that sounds bonkers crazy like a double negative... It's called avoiding the false positive of making an untrue claim, or avoidance of being the boy who called wolf when there really wasn't one... which could harm scientists» reputations & science in general.

Many of the scales demonstrated weak psychometrics in at least one of the following ways: (a) lack of psychometric data [i.e., reliability and / or validity; e.g., HFQ, MASC, PBS, Social Adjustment Scale - Self - Report (SAS - SR) and all perceived self - esteem and self - concept scales], (b) items that fall on more than one subscale (e.g., CBCL - 1991 version), (c) low alpha coefficients (e.g., below.60) for some subscales, which calls into question the utility of using these subscales in research and clinical work (e.g., HFQ, MMPI - A, CBCL - 1991 version, BASC, PSPCSAYC), (d) high correlations between subscales (e.g., PANAS - C), (e) lack of clarity regarding clinically - relevant cut - off scores, yielding high false positive and false negative rates (e.g., CES - D, CDI) and an inability to distinguish between minor (i.e., subclinical) and major (i.e., clinical) «cases» of a disorder (e.g., depression; CDI, BDI), (f) lack of correspondence between items and DSM criteria (e.g., CBCL - 1991 version, CDI, BDI, CES - D, (g) a factor structure that lacks clarity across studies (e.g., PSPCSAYC, CASI; although the factor structure is often difficult to assess in studies of pediatric populations, given the small sample sizes), (h) low inter-rater reliability for interview and observational methods (e.g., CGAS), (i) low correlations between respondents such as child, parent, teacher [e.g., BASC, PSPCSAYC, CSI, FSSC - R, SCARED, Connors Ratings Scales - Revised (CRS - R)-RSB-, (j) the inclusion of somatic or physical symptom items on mental health subscales (e.g., CBCL), which is a problem when conducting studies of children with pediatric physical conditions because physical symptoms may be a feature of the condition rather than an indicator of a mental health problem, (k) high correlations with measures of social desirability, which is particularly problematic for the self - related rating scales and for child - report scales more generally, and (l) content validity problems (e.g., the RCMAS is a measure of anxiety, but contains items that tap mood, attention, peer interactions, and impulsivity).