Sentences with phrase «called fundamentalism»

He said, «What they called fundamentalism, I call infantilism.»

In reaction to the violence and distemper we see displayed in so - called fundamentalism (of whatever religious brand), many people are touting a kind of uncritical pluralism that would amalgamate divergent faith traditions into one homogenized whole.

What is now called 9/11 focussed our minds on so - called fundamentalism.

We call it fundamentalism.

The modern form of it we call fundamentalism, but it has its ancient forms.

A: The militant religiosity that we call fundamentalism has surfaced in all the major faiths in the twentieth century.

Not exact matches

And this is why Islamic Fundamentalism and Christian Fundamentalism are very different, and to say that Islamic Shariah Law with a Holy Jihad peacefully co-existing with the so - called Non-Believers in America is the Fallacy of the Socialist Liberal Ideological who wrote this article.

Mormon fundamentalism (also called fundamentalist Mormonism) is a belief in the validity of selected fundamental aspects of Mormonism as taught and practiced in the nineteenth century, particularly during the administration of Brigham Young, an early president of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter - day Saints (LDS Church).

Fundamentalism, by contrast, is socially divisive, calling for absolute (and even) blind loyalty to a holy book or a set of fixed principles.

As Christian fundamentalism focuses its attention on the so - called Holy Land, so also does the Islamic world, where it has served to strengthen and spread Islamic fundamentalism.

If this faction mutes the premillennial debate, it has not yielded so readily on another movement that like evangelicalism and fundamentalism could easily be called «the religious phenomenon of the twentieth century» — Pentecostalism.

There are two main areas in which Christian fundamentalism endangers our human future: its domination of the churches by what may be called «the fundamentalist captivity of Christianity», and its uncritical support of the «axis of power» exercised by America and Israel.

Islamic fundamentalism also originated as a call to its own community to return to the fundamentals of its faith.

Now it would be a great mistake to attribute this difficulty solely or even primarily to so - called Muslim «fundamentalism» (which is probably a pejorative misnomer in any case); in a more basic sense, the difficulty is due to the intense integration of religion with every aspect of culture and society in the Islamic view of the world.

The fear inherent within modernity, the anxiety that the ideological Other calls my worldview into question, is one explanation for rise of fundamentalism in the modern era.

The intramural dialogue over what Mark Noll has called «the scandal of the evangelical mind» worries that intellectually serious people have passed evangelicals by while we were allured by the sensations of revivalism, seduced by a materialistic market - driven culture, overtaken by the «disaster of fundamentalism» in the face of challenges from modern science and technology, and robbed of our universities through negligence and the inertia of secularized education.

We were not far into the 21st century when fundamentalism gave us a wake - up call.

Throughout the eighteenth century in Europe, the decline of «religious certitude» ¯ what is nowadays called evangelicalism or, less knowledgeably, fundamentalism ¯ was widely taken for granted.

Fundamentalism at the time called it «neo-evangelism» and that was no compliment.

Occasionally Barr mentions a scholar who breaks out of fundamentalism into a genuinely critical stance (though usually extremely conservative)-- but only to call into question the honesty of such shifts without frank recognition of the break and even apology to critics whose work had been dismissed and motives impugned.

In mass cultures, a «wimp faith» also may evoke a militantly postured confidence — which we sometimes call «fundamentalism.»

The post generated a variety of responses (both here and on other blogs), with some folks calling for a doctrinal element to this kinds of fundamentalism.

It is called «fundamentalism»... and was actually one of the early heresies of the Church which has unfortunately reared its ugly head again as a misinformed, misdirected religion.

For example, although Creighton touted its Catholic mission, my pious students could not trust their theology professors» many thought attacking «Catholic fundamentalism» their calling.

I second that, I believe the what people call «fundamental» today is anything but, fundamentalism wasn't a bad thing (just a few simple beliefs) but now it's become way too complex to be fundamental, I mean some of the most complex stuff on earth (DNA) is simpler than today's «fundamentalists»

In one sense, today's revival of religious fundamentalism and aggressive religious communalism as well as the call to a return to the worship of nature are inevitable reactions to such self - sufficient secularism.

She might perhaps equally be called a co-foundress of that Secular Fundamentalism and moral libertarianism that is fast becoming the new state religion in modern Britain.

That, the artists say, galvanized them to explore new subject matter: fundamentalism and what Mr. Passmore calls youthful «hooliganism.»

The sheer volume of vicious language employed to recast social and cultural trends in terms of their carbon footprint suggests the rise of what Allenby calls a dangerous new «carbon fundamentalism.»

There are many reasons for scientists to be humble, and calling those who engage in debating such issues «deniers» is foolish fundamentalism.

We are at a crossroads, we can either give in to Muslim Fundamentalism and reject Science and progress completely, or acquiesce in the domination of the righteous fascists called «Environmentalists» and become there slaves, Or What???

Perhaps the most serious of all is the return of what might be called «legal fundamentalism.»