Not exact matches
We tell Him, «Even though You
look terribly
guilty in the Old Testament, we are going to
call «good» all those bad things You claim to have done.
He does not
look at our pasts and
call us
guilty.
Guilty on point 2 — I now know it's
called speculating: — LRB -
Guilty on point 3 too — my charts used to have many lines criss - crossing each other it
looked like abstract art!
Also wanted to mention, when we started using this so
called «positive reinforcement» method and have seen positive results for many behavioral issues, we end up feeling bad (or
guilty) especially if the aversive correction was given out of our sudden burst of frustration — which I think is good because that means we are aware that there must be a better way of dealing with the current problem so then we start
looking and trying out other «more benevolent» methods.
We
call those same signals «
looking guilty.»
Not so much that the so -
called «A-listers» should do their community service for the poor and down - trodde, but maybe some of them have closed ranks, and have stopped
looking for new blogs (so far Hugh is NOT
GUILTY, but we're watching...)
Also, really absurdly nitpicky note: under the «Don't include irrelevant info» paragraph it
looks like the «arraignments» was written (def: A criminal proceeding at which the defendant is officially
called before a court of competent jurisdiction, informed of the offense charged in the complaint, information, indictment, or other charging document, and asked to enter a plea of
guilty, not
guilty, or as otherwise permitted by law.