Sentences with phrase «called socialism»

Nothing that is somehow related to the functioning of the market can be called socialism.

The left locates the real culprits and doesn't blame any race and if anyone is antisemitic in that way it is called the socialism of fools and is no real socialism at all.»

Progressivism is a misnomer, since it is not progressive at all, rather it is another, more palatable, updated name for that tired, destructive failure called socialism.

John McDonnell's «it's called socialism» speech greeted by loud applause, standing ovation and pat on the back from Jeremy Corbyn #Lab16 pic.twitter.com / hqWxLqgrqe

This is called socialism.

It's called socialism folks.

Anyone who calls it Socialism is ignorant and has been listening to too much right wing propaganda.

Call it socialism if you wish, most Finns (and many Americans living in Finland) find this type of lifestyle worth of their taxes (that I pay here just as much as I did back home without any of these benefits).

Not exact matches

That commitment was quickly applied to economics, meaning so - called public ownership of production, distribution and exchange — socialism — which became a pivotal plank 20 or so years after the party emerged.

He calls it «the rugged society,» but it is really his own special blend of pragmatic socialism, freewheeling capitalism, and plain opportunism.

At the same time, Ludwig von Mises published an article in 1920 called «Economic Calculation in the Socialist Society» and a 1922 book, Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis, arguing that comprehensive central planning of the economy would be disastrous because central planners lacked market prices and market institutions to inform their actions, hence they would waste resources on a vast and even fatal scale.

Wouldn't it be more prudent to call for a move towards hugging the center rather than just singling out socialism as a threat?

There have been all sorts of calls for a «third way» between socialism and capitalism, calls which promise to help the poor, but by and large they have worsened conditions for the poor.

Moreover, these notions are supported by what one might call a prejudice in favor of the collective fostered by socialism.

Social Christianity (which on the whole is simple socialism), the Bekenntnis Kirche (which, once Hitlerism was defeated, merely aligned itself with anti-Hitlerism, thus with what might be called socio - communism), the ideas of Reinhold Niebuhr (which, while solidly thought out, affected neither church nor society)-- all have failed.

Small government handouts to low income humans are called «socialism», while large governmemt handouts to large wealthy companies and virtual monopolies are called capitalism».

Proudhon, the Robinson Crusoe of Socialism, calls this position «anti-theism».

If the actions of Christ and his early followers are what people like Rush call communism, socialism and Marxism, then Our Lord and Master Jesus Christ and the early Christians were the greatest Marxists!

Although undoubtedly motivated by deep Christian commitment, Nyerere's form of «African socialism,» called Ujamaa, ruthlessly uprooted hundreds of thousands of people and, despite massive foreign aid, drove Tanzania into a beggary from which it has never recovered.

«The coming state of humanity in the great crisis,» said Buber in 1952, «depends very much on whether another type of socialism can be set up against Moscow, and I venture even today to call it Jerusalem.»

At this time Niebuhr was driven into the mild socialism of the «Social Gospel,» but he soon began to do battle against what he called its naivete (its lack of understanding of the depths of sin in individual and society).

Whether or not he is has nothing to do with his unblinking recognition of what he calls the human tragedy of «the system of real socialism.»

The welfare state, expressive of the first Christian response listed above, has enlisted much of the support of those Christians who first called for socialism.

This is no longer Adam Smith's capitalism, but what I. F. Stone calls «private socialism» — the public takes much or most of the risk; private entrepreneurs take the whole profit.

the reason most americans want nothing to do with your religion is because it smells like that other stench we kicked back into the sewer in the 1940's called national socialism.

It too has more or less liberal and conservative expressions, with the former leaning toward communitarianism (a kind of unlikely hybrid of socialism and capitalism that Alasdair MacIntyre once rather dryly called «going to bed with the phone company») and the latter stressing traditional morality and trying to resist the rationalizing trends of modern society.

He calls the latter liberalism rather than socialism, but his advocacy of massive government programs favoring an «unsubtle, crude, old - fashioned redistribution of wealth, through taxation and public spending» is unmistakably socialist in inspiration and consequence.

All history textbooks and webpages call Marx the «father of communism or socialism.»

A group of eighty issued a call for an international conference that was held in Santiago in 1972.8 This meeting resulted in the organization of Christians for Socialism.

While «religion serving socialism» has been in the CPC lexicon for some time, direct intervention in the beliefs and practices of individual religions — including calls for the «Sinification» of Christian theology — have become more common under Xi.

Finally you link the New Economic Policy which has almost 100 years (not 6) and make no mention whatsoever to Dubček program called «Socialism with a human face» which had very specific features (latter influencing Gorbachev).

Socialism for superior brains proved no match for plain - spoken common sense, at least when it came to the fundamental judgment call of the century.

Once upon a time, such political redistribution was called «democracy», or «welfare state», or «socialism».

His vision of «stakeholding» in New Britain (1996) and Anthony Crosland's priority on the poor in The Future of Socialism (1963), what Blair calls «a magnificent essay», were different visions by Labour leaders of how to redress capitalist excess.

Someone not schooled in the Alice in Wonderland nature of New York politics might, in the era of Black Lives Matter and democratic socialism, call this cognitive dissonance.

Even the name of the country is a misnomer: after post-war socialism, we know to be suspicious of any country that feels the need to call itself a «Democratic People's Republic».

His upper class accent, the left - over remnant of a life the establish tried to force on him but which he rejected, contrasted sharply with the constant call for democratic socialism to which he dedicated his life.

Marxist critics of the Leninist and Stalinist route, called Trotskyist, usually refer to the societies that fall under the term «Actually Existing Socialism» as state capitalist or state monopoly capitalist societies.

We ended up crafting Clause one of the Equality Act which was a public duty to narrow disadvantage which was called «socialism in one clause» by left leaning commentators.

She is a member of the Campaign for Socialism which has already called on Mr Murphy to «stand aside».

This edition of Fabian Review looks at the calls for a British patriotic vision to bring the country together again and the rediscovery of English socialism with Ben Jackson, Tom Kelsey, Jon Wilson and Andrew Harrop, plus Mary Riddell interviews Neil Kinnock.

What Glasman is advocating appears to be — on the face of it — a return to what used to be called «ethical socialism», when Labour's beliefs famously owed more to Methodism than to Marx.

Also calling something «communism / socialism» is incredibly inappropriate, as the two are quite different, both in theory and in practice.

During the Cold War people who criticized Soviet government, its practices and abuses were called «dissidents» in the West, even if they politically supported Socialism or advocated better application of the Soviet laws, such as the constitution.

[15] It calls for a «New Socialism of the 21st Century», which guarantees the rights and freedoms of the individual and ensures the proper functioning of a welfare state.

When it puts values in the driving seat — what is sometimes called «ethical socialism» — then policy imagination is the result.

His modern incarnation has been called many names from pre-distribution to progressive austerity or socialism with no money.

It gives an opening to radicalism, to extreme socialism or the Trumpist calls to «drain the swamp» and burn the empire to the ground.

An Inspector Calls EssayAn Inspector Calls essay should first put the play within its social and political context with the thesis statement that it was written in 1912 by John Boynton Priestley to express his sympathies towards socialism.

That's called «socialism», a word an average American considers a curse.