Sentences with phrase «called synoptic»

Free extratropical Rossby waves with zonal wave numbers about 6 to 8 mostly occur as high - amplitude, fast traveling waves (the so - called synoptic transients responsible for much of the weather variability in the extratropics); once established, they can freely propagate predominantly to the east with a phase speed c ≈ 6 − 12 m ⋅ s − 1 without maintenance from external forcing.

The perceptual trick, called synoptic vision, is apparent on any nearby two - dimensional image, but is especially marked where other depth cues exist.

Because the three run so close together and «see together» the life of Jesus, they have been called the Synoptic Gospels.

The question of the relationship of each of the Synoptic Gospels to the others, including their agreements and differences, is called the Synoptic problem.

For that reason they are called the Synoptic Gospels.

Not exact matches

In the Synoptic Gospels the account of Jesus» calling of his first disciples from among Galilean fishermen belongs to the paranormal or unexplained.

It is called a garden in the Gospel of John (18:1), but the Synoptic Gospels call it only a place.

More significant, perhaps, is the fact that my proposal does not call for the synoptic, synthetic inquiry Wood terms «systematic theology.»

By engaging people in the effort to understand God by focusing study of various subject matters within the horizon of questions about Christian congregations, a theological school may help them cultivate capacities both for what Charles Wood [2] calls «vision,» that is, formulating comprehensive, synoptic accounts of the Christian thing as a whole, and what he calls «discernment,» that is, insight into the meaning, faithfulness, and truth of particular acts in the practice of worship (in the broad sense of worship that we have adopted for this discussion).

When we add the obvious point that the term itself is very frequently to be found in the synoptic tradition and comparatively infrequently outside it, then it becomes clear that we are fully entitled to claim that the real and significant differences between the use within the synoptic tradition and outside it call for an explanation.

The task of reviewing the selection and balance of topics has been made easier by the editors, who have thoughtfully provided what they call a «synoptic outline of contents,» in which the entries are arranged and listed in «conceptual categories.»

This fundamental solution of the relationship of the Synoptic gospels, as the first three gospels are called because of their common view of the life of Jesus (Gr.

And like the fact that many in the church (especially in evangelical circles) have narrow - mindedly focused on one report in John of Jesus telling someone they need to be born again, overlooking Jesus» constant call throughout the synoptics to follow Him in the process?

The theory of traditional theology has, of course, been that of a bodily resurrection... This conception is quite clearly present in parts of the New Testament, particularly in the Synoptic Gospels, and may be called for convenience, the idea of «reanimation».

All three of the Synoptic Gospels, in one form or another, represent him as calling his proclamation good news.

Challenging what he calls «the Guild» of «critical» Bible scholars, Finnis argues that the conventional view widely accepted today that the Gospel of Mark is of earlier date than the Gospels of Matthew and Luke is quite wrong, and that the evidence is clear that Mark comes third and last in time among the synoptic Gospels.

We shall return to Jeremias's work on the parables again and again, for it is epoch - making in several respects, but for the moment we want only to call attention to the consequences of this work so far as a general view of the nature of the synoptic tradition is concerned the success of Jeremias's work demands that we accept his starting - point, namely, that any parable as it now stands in the gospels represents the teaching of the early Church and the way back from the early Church to the historical Jesus is a long and arduous one.

Differences between John and the Synoptic Gospels: Matthew, Mark, and Luke are often called the «synoptic» Synoptic Gospels: Matthew, Mark, and Luke are often called the «synoptic» synoptic» gospels.

Hurtado opens by treating the «religious environment» of Jesus» day and then proceeds to examine the Pauline evidence of Christ's messiahship, the commonality of the Synoptic Gospels with the Gospel of John, and then the other early «Jesus books» (as the noncanonical accounts of Christ's life are called).

How otherwise are we to understand the synoptic accounts of the majestic authoritative words of Jesus: «Why do you call me good?

We reach this by calling attention to the nature of the narratives in the synoptic gospels; like the sayings, they reflect the equation earthly Jesus = risen Lord.

In the synoptic tradition, on the other hand, although the same mythological overlay and parenetic application is there, the fact remains that we do have what we would call historical material and historicizing tendencies in a way we do not have elsewhere in the New Testament.

And associated with it, according to the Synoptic narrative, on the same day or soon after, is the ejection of the traders from the forecourt of the Temple, the so - called cleansing of the Temple.

In 1988, the U.S. Geological Survey began a project called PRISM, for Pliocene Research, Interpretation and Synoptic Mapping, which aims to gather as many geologic clues as possible about Pliocene environments.

So anyone who does not agree with Man - made carbon driving weather is referred to as a «Climate Skeptic» however a great name for someone who does believe in this new religion you could call a «Climate Synoptic» just like a bad weather chart (Synoptic) they get it wrong so many times.