Call us about your claim.
Having still heard nothing from Allianz,
I called them about my claim status this morning, and was told, «IT HAS BEEN REJECTED DUE TO PRE-CONDITIONS».
Id like to add that each time
I called about the claim (stopped counting after 6 phone calls) I was met with a customer service person who sounded like they were just woken up from a nap, and hated me instantly without getting past hello.
Policy holders must
call about their claim as soon as possible in order to record the claim.
Do not let too much time pass before
calling about your claim so that you can begin the process and get the matter resolved as quickly as possible.
Not exact matches
Theranos» lawyer acknowledged to the WSJ that proprietary technology was not used in all of the company's tests, but in a later statement
called doubts
about Edison's accuracy «baseless» and «erroneous,»
claiming that the quoted sources «were never in a position to understand Theranos» technology.»
On Oct. 15, The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) published an investigative report that
claims the company does not use its own «revolutionary» blood testing technology,
called Edison, for the majority of lab testing, largely because of concerns
about accuracy.
His remark is drastically different than what he's said
about Trump in the past: From
calling him a «jagoff,» to saying he's unfit to be president, to
claiming a Trump - presidency would crash the stock markets — Cuban, a Hillary Clinton supporter, has said next to nothing positive
about the President - elect.
Of course, Ross's sabre rattling could be the precursor to some gunboat diplomacy (although the White House
claims that President Trump was just joking
about sending in U.S. troops in his
call with the Mexican President).
They make some bad
calls, and their advertising is borderline scammish, with over the top
claims, but I average
about 25 % annual returns by reading all the newsletters and following the ones I choose to follow.
If you're still worried or doubtful
about claiming a particular business expense, talk to your accountant and / or give the Canada Revenue Agency a
call.
The Iranian defence minister once again
called the Zionist regime's
claims about Iran baseless and absurd and added the levelling of such accusations is not acceptable even for people and public opinion of the world.
You should
call them to learn
about the process of your
claim or if you are not satisfied with the offer made to you.
Mr. Collins, the British lawmaker, said he planned to
call Alexander Nix, the chief executive of Cambridge Analytica, to return to Parliament and answer questions
about testimony last month in which he
claimed that the company never obtained or used Facebook data.
Second, he questions Comey's integrity,
calling the memos Comey relies on to make his
claims about Trump's decision to fire him «phony.»
you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I
call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as
calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking
about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you
claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.
You insidious racists post comment
about Obama that are demeaning and degrading, like
calling him and his wife monkeys, but then
claim you're not racist.
For that matter, taking a stance like that,
calls serious doubt
about the intelligence of the person making that
claim.
My wife and I were last night
called by a family friend to pray with her
about her daughter who would disappear from home and when she re-appears, she is kind of confused,
claiming to have been followed by a certain girl they met in school and tried recruiting her to devil worship.
My story is
about leaving the boxing gloves behind,
about calling a truce on the culture wars that have left so many people beaten and bruised and left for dead by those who
claim to follow a crucified Savior.
How come not one liberal elite Hollywood type questions Obama's Christianity??? Oblablah
claims he's a Christian and uses Scripture in some of his speeches... yet the usual liberals aren't upset at ALL
about his so -
called beliefs.
Humanitarian works are fine, but beware of the preachers who come into your community
claiming to know more than you
about something they
call GOD.
The pompousness of the one minister to make
claims about Obama's Christianity clearly
calls into question his judgement.
What it invites is critique from theology; its
claims about human nature and its status in relation to divinity
call for elaboration.
One Atheist said: «
Calling Atheism a religion is like calling bald a hair color However, atheists make such claims so Atheism can avoid legal imperatives placed on religions in many countries, and can avoid some of the ideological hang - ups people have about «religion&
Calling Atheism a religion is like
calling bald a hair color However, atheists make such claims so Atheism can avoid legal imperatives placed on religions in many countries, and can avoid some of the ideological hang - ups people have about «religion&
calling bald a hair color However, atheists make such
claims so Atheism can avoid legal imperatives placed on religions in many countries, and can avoid some of the ideological hang - ups people have
about «religion».
For anyone who is not already predisposed to believing that the imaginary is real, if his attention is
called to the distinction between reality and imagination and he is explicitly reminded that the imaginary is not real, he's not likely to accept
claims about imaginary things as truth.
Those who
call our attention to contemporary social problems commonly try to heighten our concern by making often unjustified
claims about the unprecedented nature of the challenges before us.
The function of a
claim about the totality was not, as it was for Wilson, to provide «objective knowledge» and to serve as a basis for what Wilson
called an «enduring ethical consensus» (BBM 54).
I'd
call «it» one's perceived «reality» though, there's nothing personal
about what «others»
claim to be real.
The charity said Vishal Masih, a Christian, and Bhola Ram, a Hindu, worked as cleaners for a hospital, and a policeman
claims that he received a phone
call from a local journalist
about the incident.
They saw, or
claimed they saw those who had seen, a certain man
called Jesus of Nazareth who wandered
about Galilee and Judea attended by a devoted band of followers, performing marvelous cures of the sick, raising the dead.
Why is that still so fundamentally important, in spite of our uncertainty
about what to do with the singular
claims about something
called a «resurrection»?
When atheists make remarks
about «God», we are referring to «the supernatural being which you
call God and the
claims which you make
about «him»».
The force of my arguments
about past responsibility or future fear is not essentially one of grounding altruism or appropriate self - interest, which I would ground in the metaphysical
claim that all humans have the same essence which constitutes their unity as a class
called by Kant the kingdom of ends.
For the text to be taken as testimony, as relevatory, judgment must be made
about objective characteristics, above all what Ricoeur
calls in Interpretation Theory its «self reference,» its
claims to represent an «I» or a «we» engaged in a certain past «event of discourse.
Your speaking
about guys like me, «Those who cried exclusivity...» is in the same tone of anger and unlovingness that you
claim we walk in when we
call homosexuality sin.
Contemporary theology is marked by a lively debate
about the
call to abandon any
claim to Christian uniqueness, a
claim viewed as offensive and outmoded in a religiously pluralist world.
The man
called jesus has nothing to do with god besides when he spoke
about the dude... his message was one of love and compassion... nothing to worship there just a good man with a good message — then when he
claims to know things
about the afterlife and so
called kingdom of heaven all come from eastern beliefs dating from 500 to 600 years before jesus was said to have lived.
Women who have never
claimed their sense of
calling are coming forward to do what they have thought
about for years.
Victor had awakened from their lovemaking in a wild dream
about hanging himself, and months later a voice
claiming to be «the devil» had
called threatening to take Marge in punishment for his adultery.
In a self - destructive spasm of what we used to
call Freudian projection, Michael Sean Winters
claims that Archbishop Charles Chaput ought to apologize for and withdraw the remarks he made a week ago, in answering a question after his Erasmus Lecture,
about the recent synod in Rome....
This thinker, whose name I shall not disclose, said that he was becoming more and more convinced that there was «something in the older metaphysical — he
called them «ontological» —
claims; at the moment he was much concerned, he said, to find a way of giving more than linguistic status to such propositions as «personal God», for it appeared to him that these statements somehow pointed to a truth
about the universe,
about the nature of things, that must be reckoned with in any honest description of the «way things are».
Many of those who are
claimed to have been converted through the programs turn out to be people who were already Christian or who have been confused
about why they were
calling a broadcaster, or who
called seeking help of some other kind.
But, so far as I can see, the only
claims that Paul makes
about any distinctiveness or originality concern (1) his conviction that he was specially
called by God to conduct a mission to gentiles, and (2) his view of the terms on which gentiles were to be received as full co-religionists with Jewish believers (baptism / faith in Jesus without taking on Jewish observance of Torah).
Yes, there is a lot of abstract, esoteric speculation going on there
about the nature of God, but if we believe we are people made in the image of God, and especially if we also believe we are
called to incarnate that image to the world, then that incarnated life will be, or at least should be, defined by the life of the God we
claim to image.
«As the anonymous caller proceeded to disparage me, telling her how disgusted he was that I would
call myself gay while
claiming to be a Christian, she stuck up for me, telling him that he didn't know what he was talking
about, and that she was proud of me for being honest,» writes Justin.
He
calls it hatred, and his voice rose in anger when he talked
about the
claims by Sprigg and other Christian groups that gay men are more predisposed to molest children and that homosexual behavior is inherently harmful.
Lastly, a note
about the name — I hate foods that
claim to taste like things and then
call them by really decadent names just to trick you into eating them.
And as each course arrived (the Icarian stew
claiming its rich, flavor - deep place as an obvious showstopper), Mr. Buettner
called attention to a last point
about the Blue Zones: that in longevity idylls like Icaria, it's not just
about what you eat, but how you eat, and how much you and your friends enjoy a meal together.
We were pretty skeptical
about a wellness trend
called earthing (or grounding) when we first heard
about it, but it turns out that biophysics can back up the
claims.