Sentences with phrase «calling other religions»

Aren't they, by definition, also calling other religions incorrect?

All my White Power buddies, this pastor is gone past our norms of just burning the crosses in the black neighbourhoods, I have never seen muslims burn any religions holy books or call any other religion derogatory names.

So you call Muslims the Anti Christ even though he has a very high position and honor in Islam, but you don't call the other religions Anti Christ even though they don't even give him an honor to begin with.

Not exact matches

I find it strange that the so call christian who are always there to judge other and throw their religion around when it come to the matters that separate us but their moral voice seem to be lost where it is needed.

Specifically, the Commission on Religion and Public Life called for the number of bishops to be cut from 26 to 16, to allow clerics from other major religions in Britain to be represented, as well as other strands of the Church currently which are excluded, such as the Roman Catholic Church and Black - majority churches.

If as you say you have talked to others who claim to be Atheist the way you describe it then they are IDIOTS who also don't understand Atheism and yes at that point since they are claiming «no God» to be true, then by all means call their point of view a «religion».

Oh yeah... And this so called religion of peace show us that they can't stop from killing each other... Shiite vs Sunni and all the stories from all these countries from the old Soviet block that we can't remember because of all the K's Z's R's and T's on their name (no criticism of their language... we just can't associate those names very well)...

as far as the cross at the twin tower site, just place the religious symbol of all whom died there and we can call it fair, until then it is endorsing one religion over the others.

Also, in response to the way you twisted your question, the so - called holy wars that you and Thor are referring to were also run by governments so also fall under the whole «nations supressing other religions» clause of your statement and are invalid.

Christendom: I think that Christianity as a religion, which purports to call people to follow Jesus, but uses money, power, and political prestige to force «Christianity» on others, is nothing other than the adoption of all the things which Satan promised Jesus in Luke 4, but which Jesus turned down.

«But then the heads of the delegation of the Catholic Church proposed that any call to stop persecution of Christian should mention first that also Christians in history have persecuted other religions and other churches.»

All of the faithful, called to renew the gift of faith, should try to communicate their own experience of faith and charity to their brothers and sisters of other religions, with those who do not believe, and with those who are just indifferent.

«Liberation theology issues a call not only to Christianity, but to the other religions of the world as well.

It's the «two meditations with your other religion and call me in the morning» approach.

The vast majority of Christians in the world today, as well as those of other religions, find their calling within this system.

No other structure in the world can be called on to promise eternal salvation, and when such salvific claims are made in the name of some nation, race, social class, religion, or ideology, the church must fight such idolatry and blasphemy with all its means of persuasion, even to the point of martyrdom.

Churches are blending with other denominations so that there is no distinguishability between some Protestant religions any longer, calling themselves, «Non-denominational,» when people want distinctive mission statements or predictive doctrine and formal structure;

The discussion about the relationship of Christianity to other religions has given new relevance to a long - standing dispute between the Roman Catholic and the Orthodox Churches about the relation of the Holy Spirit to the other two persons of the Trinity — the so - called «filioque» («and the Son») dispute.

This policy, called Josephinism, held that the state has not only the right to defend the Church, to reform it in the case of harmful activities, and to inspect it, but also to convene councils or synods, to end theological controversies, to censor theological books, and to tolerate other religions.

This is what the higher religions of man have called «sin»; it may be given some other name by so - called «secular» thinkers, but the fact itself is plainly to be seen and the tragedy of it is very clear.

Maybe try to respect others religions first man before calling my holy book fictional.

Conversion therapy is hatred and bigotry dressed up in religiousity and made palpable because that religion has made people desperate to become something other than who they were born to be, stigmatizing them and calling them filth until they can no longer stand themselves so much that they beg to be made clean.

To put it — for the sake of argument — a bit too simply: there have been behind the civil religion from the beginning two great structures of interpretation, the one I shall call biblical, the other utilitarian.

everything in the universe evolves, not only life forms but also memes, Religion is a meme so it also change in conformity to its era or time of its conception as faith.Because in pre scientific times thousands of years ago, the scientific method of approach or philosophy has not existed yet, myth or merely story telling is considered facts, The first religion called animism more than 10,000 years ago believed that spirits or god exists in trees, rivers, mountains, boulders or in any places people at that time considered holy.hundreds of them, then when the Greeks and Romans came, it was reduced to 12, they called it polytheism, when the Jews arrived, it was further reduced to 1, monotheism.its derivatives, Christianity And Islam and later hundreds of denominations that includes Mormonism and Protestants flourished up to today.So in short this religions evolved in accordance to the scientific knowledge of the age or era they existed.If you graph the growth of knowledge, it shows a sharp increase in the last 500 years, forcing the dominant religions at that time to reinterprete their dogmas, today this traditional religions are becoming obsolete and has to evolve to survive.But first they have to unify against atheism.in the dialectical process of change, Theism in one hand and the opposing force atheism in the other, will resolve into a result or synthesis.The process shall be highlighted in the internet in the near future.

Bet if we tried a show called «Tried & True Americans» it would get yanked because it would be insulting to other nationalities, religions, etc.... we're not even suppose to say «Merry Christmas» because it's insulting to others... that's BS... this was OUR country long before it belongs to others... if you want to come to our country then you respect our beliefs and our traditions, DO NOT make us change them because you don't agree with them..

He put himself in the spotlight with the daughter calling 911 on him, but he and all the other crooks using religion should be put in prison.

In his first encyclical, issued while the Council was still finding its way, Paul VI called for a Church in dialogue with other churches, with other religions, and with secular humanists, but called attention to the virtual impossibility of dialogue with atheistic communism.

Your so - called religion honors neither Islam nor Prophet Mohammed, nor will it ever silence other faiths.

As opposed to listening to the ramblings of a bunch of plagiarists from the dark ages who thought they could figure out the origins of the universe by copying what other religions of the day claimed but tweaking it enough to call it «the truth»?

All of the great religions have attempted to call human beings to their proper relationship to God and with each other — that relationship which is love.

The other theories are called religion and they have no place in science class.

How about those that take only certain things from Christianity, then mold it with other religions and call themselves Christians?

The bill, called the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), would protect the right of every person to practice his religion, without exception, unless the government can show that it bas a «compelling» reason to interfere (meaning that the reasons for the interference are extraordinarily important and can not reasonably be attained in any other way).

God does not call us to hate others of other religions either, we are to share our testimony with others.

Christian interest in Buddhism and the attempt to appropriate its insights is far more widespread than Buddhist interest in Christianity Still, the situation is not a simple one in Japan, he said, Much of the vitality of religious life and practice in Japan is in the so - called new religions, some of which draw on Buddhism more than others.

in my years of expreiencing most of the so - called evangelical and conservative christians, i find them to be arrogant, conceited, self - rightious, hateful, and dismissive of all other religions that are not christian... why would i want to convert to be like them?

This does not mean that there is a point at which accommodation and neutrality converge (although there may be); it means only that as time and cases go by, the state - centeredness of what we are bold to call religious freedom is more and more apparent, and the pressure on religionists to conform to the expectations of others grows and grows, with the inevitable complicity of the judges who supposedly protect religion's «right» to be free.

He wrote appreciative statements about Schleiermacher, he allowed that Schleiermacher might be interpreted as a theologian of the Holy Spirit, he emphasized the humanity of God in contrast to the Wholly Other, he called human beings «covenant - partners of God,» and he looked for «parables» of grace and truth in non-Christian religions and ideologies.

c) In line with Americans RIGHT TO EXERCISE THEIR RELIGIOUS FREEDOMS firstly DEMAND that MUSLIMS TO OPT - OUT OF THEIR RELIGION, and also CALL for letting proponents of other faiths to propogate their religion near Mosques and Islamic organizations just as the Muslims do near churches, temples, synRELIGION, and also CALL for letting proponents of other faiths to propogate their religion near Mosques and Islamic organizations just as the Muslims do near churches, temples, synreligion near Mosques and Islamic organizations just as the Muslims do near churches, temples, synagogues.

No other higher religion in the world calls its participants to a full experience of the pain and darkness of the human act of dying as the way to transfiguration and rebirth.

Hence, if we situate the call of Abraham, as well as other special revelatory moments of the history of religion, within the wider context of cosmic evolution, this may help soften the «scandal of particularity» associated with any unique or distinctive summoning by God of a particular people to bear witness in a novel way to the divine promise and mystery that come to expression first in the very creation of the world.

Islam gives its followers only the right to call the people of other religion to the path of Islam.

When you idiots curse other religions; when you call others infidels who shoul dbe killed; when you decide that your religion is the one that all men must subscribe to or face dire consequences... if your allah is so powerful, have him come down and make his will the way it is.

What Iran is simply saying under the motivation and inspiration of «ISLAM» is if you believe any other way other than «ISLAM» you are wrong, and our President as well as many other political leaders here in America call this a religion of peace?

Buddhism in its various branches, Islam, Hinduism, Taoism, and others of the long - established religious faiths — plus new religions all over the world and the so - called primitive or local religions of Africa and elsewhere — are all now of world concern.

A hindu, ignorant from hindered gutter called india, uses other's ID to confuse message from original person, sacred to see his hinduism, absurdity as a religion exposed.

You will not find this call to true peace and rest in any other faith, All other religions it is a constant never ending struggle of some sort, but not for the Christian, The Bible states (For by grace or ye (you) saved through faith, and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God.

Jürgen Moltmann, on the other hand, emphasized the difference between the new and the old meanings of political theology depicting what had earlier been called political theology as the ideology of political religion, which is the symbolic integration of the beliefs of a people through which they sanction and sanctify their traditions and their ambitions.12 Moltmann strongly supports Peterson in his critique of political theology in this sense.13 It is the task of what is properly called political theology — in Metz's sense — to unmask the pretenses of political religions.

The questions about religion and public life, those calling for «public» discussion, no longer focus on the verifiability of religious speech but concern quite other issues: methods of understanding and describing the religious realities, old and new, that we see appearing around us; useful criteria for assessing these religions and for defining and comprehending this new set of powers in our public life; and ways of protecting vital religious groups from the excesses of the public reaction to them, and protecting the public from the excesses of powerful religious groups — hardly questions a secular culture had thought it would have to take seriously!

So far we have not run across a single LGBT person, including those who have never been to a church and those who follow other religions, who do not know what the so - called «clobber passages» say.