It's
called Biblical Scholarship.
Not exact matches
A reading of scripture refreshed by appropriate
scholarship: «
Biblical scholarship is a great gift of God to the church, aiding it in its task of going ever deeper into the meaning of scripture and so being refreshed and energized for the tasks to which we are
called in and for the world,» says Wright.
Call it what you want, it is just more media hype to promote a new, imminently forthcoming book with shoddy
Biblical and archaeological
scholarship or historical accuracy.
For many years, I felt that part of my
call as a writer and blogger of faith was to be a different sort of evangelical, to advocate for things like gender equality, respect for LGBT people, and acceptance of science and
biblical scholarship within my community.
I recently read a book
called God's Word in Human Words by Kenton Sparks, which is purportedly an evangelical defense of critical
biblical scholarship.
Third, it encourages superficial
scholarship rather than serious
Biblical wrestling for fear that one proven «error» will
call all of one's faith in doubt.
He has
called the bluff of much fundamentalist
biblical scholarship in a way that will make it difficult for reflective practitioners to continue in their ways.
In most of the denominations there is still a considerable number of
biblical literalists (self - styled conservatives but
called fundamentalists by others) who refuse to accept the views of modern historical and textual
scholarship as to the true meanings of the Bible.
so -
called «critical»
scholarship — especially the
biblical variety, with its ideological stridencies — I am, more.
An important footnote to this chapter in the development of modern
biblical scholarship is the fact that source criticism was often
called (and still is sometimes
called) «literary criticism.»
In this respect, his approach is very different from that of another distinguished literary critic, Robert Alter, author of The Art of
Biblical Narrative, who deprecates what he calls the excavative techniques of professional biblical scholarship and works with the text as it is, in its fin
Biblical Narrative, who deprecates what he
calls the excavative techniques of professional
biblical scholarship and works with the text as it is, in its fin
biblical scholarship and works with the text as it is, in its final form.
The purpose of this appendix, then, is to summarize the results of modern
Biblical scholarship concerning the resurrection, to look at the conclusions reached by those whom I will
call the «minimalists», and to evaluate their arguments and proposals.