We hear more
calls for teacher effectiveness than ever before, and teacher effectiveness is a significant part of the national discussion on education.
Not exact matches
Most public school
teachers are feeling embattled these days, with public criticisms of their
effectiveness and
calls for tougher evaluations and promotion criteria.
Using what the city
calls a «new framework
for measuring
teacher effectiveness» instituted in December, principals approved fewer
teachers for tenure this year — 58 percent of 5,209
teachers as opposed to 97 percent of those eligible in 2006 - 7.
The fourth edition of the UNESCO - Hamdan bin Rashid Al - Maktoum Prize
for Outstanding Practice and Performance in Enhancing the
Effectiveness of
Teachers has opened the
call for nominations.
As
teachers, we are often asked to «do» a lot more than necessary: memorize standards, plan lessons, prepare
for various assessments,
call homes, provide a warm environment
for our students (and visitors), attend faculty meetings with varying
effectiveness and relevance, grade mounds of papers, and take what little time we have left to eat and sleep, usually less than we should.
The naïve
calls for «highly qualified
teachers» in the No Child Left Behind act have been replaced by recognition that credentials and qualifications — the objects of past policies — are not closely related to
teacher effectiveness in the classroom.
PBS:
For a NewsHour story profiling a for - profit teacher preparation program called Teach Now never asked the obvious and necessary questions about quality and effectiveness rat
For a NewsHour story profiling a
for - profit teacher preparation program called Teach Now never asked the obvious and necessary questions about quality and effectiveness rat
for - profit
teacher preparation program
called Teach Now never asked the obvious and necessary questions about quality and
effectiveness rates.
As the report notes, despite widespread
calls for connecting evidence of new
teachers»
effectiveness back to their preparation programs, «there has been no coordinated effort to provide these programs with valid, reliable, timely, and comparable data about the [educators] they prepare» (p. 2).
Also recall that one of the key reports that triggered the current
call for VAMs, as the «more objective» measures needed to measure and therefore improve
teacher effectiveness, was based on data that suggested that «too many
teachers» were being rated as satisfactory or above.
Although evaluation has traditionally been a local responsibility, federal programs have been
calling for states to require evaluation systems that include specific measures of
teacher effectiveness, such as student achievement data.
If
teacher effectiveness depends on context, this is another source of error that
calls for further study.
The new attention to
effectiveness is most obvious in the
call for improving
teacher evaluation.
The Long Beach Unified School District's use of student scores to assess the
effectiveness of programs, instructional strategies and
teachers is a rarity in California, and state Supt. of Public Instruction Jack O'Connell
called it a model
for other California school districts during a hastily arranged round - table discussion.
In response first to the federal Race to the Top grant and then the NCLB waiver mandates, Connecticut developed a
teacher and principal evaluation system
calling for student standardized test scores to be a part of a
teacher and principal's
effectiveness rating.
Ripley
calls for high quality
teachers but fails to discuss the conundrum American
teachers face, as their profession is simultaneously being de-professionalized and scrutinized
for effectiveness through accountability policy (Milner IV, 2013).
Indeed, Pam Benigno, director of the Education Policy Center at the Independence Institute,
called it a «landmark day in Colorado,» saying the bill «will align evaluated
teacher and principal
effectiveness more closely with student academic growth and weaken tenure protections
for consistently ineffective
teachers.»
In response to the
call for increased rigor and
effectiveness in
teacher preparation, one of the largest
teacher preparation programs in the country, Mary Lou Fulton
Teachers College at Arizona State University (ASU), implemented iTeachAZ.