Sentences with phrase «calls people of all kinds»

The new study issued by the Catholic Theological Society of America calls people of all kinds and conditions to the difficult task of using their sexuality to be fully human.

Not exact matches

With the new Echo that features a screen, users have the options to voice call, video call or «drop in» — which lets users instantly connect with the person they are calling if they enable «drop in» permission (kind of like an intercom).

That's kind of what happens when a person straps on the SuperFlex exosuit equipped with tiny motors called actuators from SRI Robotics.

«The best kinds of people — and it's very important for scaling and anything that you're doing — are what I would call «happy worriers,»» Sutton said.

And he also knew that the business he's starting, a service called Diggen to allow Web retailers to better target shoppers, was hardly about to inflame the passions of the kinds of people who donate money on sites like Kickstarter.

But anyway we did it and then finally I went to these acting classes there and I met some people and a cinematographer at Universal years ago named Irving Glassberg called me up and said who I'd met and he had... We talked about sports and swimming and all that kind of stuff.

«A lot of people dab promotionally into these kind of offers,» T - Mobile CEO John Legere said on a call with analysts and reporters.

To avoid bad but vaguely plausible start - up ideas — what the Y Combinator team calls sitcom ideas, i.e., the kind of ideas TV writers would make up if a character on a show had a start - up — choose something that some people want a lot rather than something lots of people might sort of want a little.

About a quarter of people who land in Sarah Vermunt's coaching office have some kind of unexplained ailment their doctor calls «stress - induced»: headaches, neck pain, back pain, insomnia.

«What matters and should matter to politicians and people who believe in the kind of values that I believe the National Citizens» Coalition share and the Reform Party share is not whether the Canadian state prospers, but whether the Canadian people and the land we call Canada prosper.»

«We call on people everywhere to join with us to insist on a world in which women of all kinds can pursue their dreams free from sexual assault, abuse and predatory behavior.

There's a part of it that I think people kind of skip over, which is he talks about when he was first fired from Apple, he called David Packard.

If a person is intellectually honest, inquisitive about the universe, ethical, kind, and compassionate, the person will arrive at a set of behaviors consistent with what we call «good».

People can call themselves any kind of Catholic, or Christian they want and it isn't anybody's business but their own.

I now believe it does a tremendous disservice to honorable people who are faithful believers to place on them the additional burden of guilt, shame and magnified suffering that comes from the kind of doctrine that promotes (sells) prayer as a magic talisman which will somehow change God's mind, alter physical circumstance, and fix intractable problems — if only the one praying has enough faith or asks in the right way or lives a holy enough life or professes Jesus enough or waits patiently or never gives up or any of a hundred different gotchas that can be called upon to justify the lack of an affirmative answer.

A kind of friendship may be had between an authority figure and a subordinate, but not the mutual closeness and intimate, reciprocal trust that people call «best friendship.»

The other thing about that kind of fiction is that if you don't have an altar call at the end, people think it has failed.

Many young people are obviously of another type; some of Ted's beatnik contemporaries, for example, would doubtless call him a «square»; but it is to this particular and worthwhile kind of person that these letters are addressed.

Yet the central - state materialist replies that images are not really spatial entities of any kind at all except perhaps in appearance — they are the way in which certain brain processes appear to the material system which we call a person and whose brain it is.

The split is really a shock, to me, to see people call themselves Christian and yet... and yet they are the most greedy, sick, sadistic, cruel, and devilish kind you could ever witness this side of the grave.

People filled with all kinds of hatreds are walking around calling themselves Christian.

People, I think that arromadazda said it, the whole notion of right and wrong kinds of Christianity is called into question.

These kinds of ugly theories have existed for far too long now and the people who perpetuate such ideas need to be called out and and seen for what they are; ignorant racists and hate - mongers.

In his fiction, the church exists on the periphery of the community's fellowship, and exhibits what philosopher Norman Wirzba calls a «disincarnate form of Christianity,» a kind of gnosticism, isolated and disconnected from where the people live their lives during the week.

Best of all, even though Unchurching is a critical look at the church and contains a call for people to follow Jesus away from the four walls of Christendom, the book is incredibly gracious and kind.

Instead of just calling people names and trying to insinuate or directly call believers ignorant why do the atheist not just accept that some can a different belief and that such belief should be able to be discussed in a kind respectful manner.

If enough people do not care or do not know, that can be construed as a kind of negative consent, but it is not what the American people were taught to call government by the consent of the governed.

that He had defeated death or satan, this crucifixion was a promise that He had to make perfectly clear to His enemy 1st before He could say to the world ALL those who were created in his image, that its done it is finished I did what I said I would do, if you decide you need me, I will be waiting, man talk about patience, and this isnt the kind of patience that your see when people are waiting in line and they arent tapping thier foot, this is called perfect Faith, that comes in trusting and know the end from the beginning, thats HUGE!

i am sorry J.W but i don't believe there is a god of any kind... if there was a god, why would such a so called all powerful being allow for the treatment of its creation by its creation... the argument of free will is an old and tired one... if the existence was true and the laws put in place to honor such a creature were equally upheld by god then i would have been punished a long long time ago and so would have the majority of people... believer or not!

There is nothing here to portray either calling or election as some kind of irresistible decree that a person should repent and believe (Marston and Forster, God's Strategy in Human History, 164).

The alleged subordination of the gospel to Karl Marx is illustrated, for example, by charging that «false» liberation theology concentrates too much on a few selected biblical texts that are always given a political meaning, leading to an overemphasis on «material» poverty and neglecting other kinds of poverty; that this leads to a «temporal messianism» that confuses the Kingdom of God with a purely «earthly» new society, so that the gospel is collapsed into nothing but political endeavor; that the emphasis on social sin and structural evil leads to an ignoring or forgetting of the reality of personal sin; that everything is reduced to praxis (the interplay of action and reflection) as the only criterion of faith, so that the notion of truth is compromised; and that the emphasis on communidades de base sets a so - called «people's church» against the hierarchy.

========== Atheists are on this board all day every day with one basic message: «people that believe in the God of Abraham are stupid» (the nice version is «people that believe in God are engaging in holding rational and irrational beliefs simultaneously, but we wont call them «stupid»)», and you never see this kind of outpouring of incensed righteous indignation from Christians.

The report shows a sort of tortured desire for some kind of good, some kind of affirmation of human dignity: Wonderfully, it calls on Member States to «implement policies and measures aimed at preventing people from having abortions for social or economic reasons and providing support to mothers and couples in difficulty.»

The world needs more kind and compassionate people like this man, and less of the mean - spirited and hate - filled people like these so - called atheists on this board.

here's the kind of people they are: they say «JW are the only Chrisitan group trying there best to do Gods will mean while the other called «christians» do only Gods will when is convenient for them.

In his teaching and example of unbroken fellowship with God, of love and service to men, of humility and sincerity, of forgiveness toward even his most malicious enemies, of sensitive understanding of the spoken or unspoken needs of the humblest of persons whose lives touched his, we see the kind of living to which we are called.

Most of the time, they've been so - called «values voters» who demanded that their leaders be people of faith, committed to traditional moral principles, and the kind of politicians who stand up for the 10 Commandments.

The unipolarists may be granted their semantic insistence that this kind of «imperialism» deserves to be called something else, for they do not aspire to occupy any particular land without the consent of its people.

And how many of the people you've observed using this kind of language called themselves Christians?

Not at all, but here I am looking for a job to pay off the financial debt I made thinking I am sort of called, to eventually f (o) und family, and going starting tomorrow on a full - time two week course on how to write job applications, so me explaining the sinfullness of suicide, and regarding many persons on this planet me motivating them to endure whatever crappy situation (often for profit and / or gain of someone else) even tho they would be better off leaving such situation / s if possible (kind of Moses), seems rather pointless.

Thus the spectacle of persons in Stalin's Russia willingly confessing deeds or words they never committed or spoke, not out of guilt or masochism but out of loyalty to the necessities of the movement's logic which has called for a certain kind of crime to be committed and confessed at a particular point in history.

It involved emancipation from self - centered preoccupation of all kinds, freedom from the tyranny of legalistic and pharisaical religion and morality, forgiveness, a new relation of sonship towards God, consecration to membership of a people called to serve his purposes for the world.

But as a general pattern this seems to me a product of romanticism, taking with insufficient seriousness the «materialism of Christianity,» as William Temple called it, and quite likely to produce the wrong kind of guilt feelings in competent young people who are in or who are considering the ministry — as if this activity were not worthy of economic support.

And the same logic should make it clear, of course, that all sorts of other kinds of people — childless gay people, infertile people, people who do not feel called to parenthood — can become every bit as mature (or immature) as a parent of six, as long as they can find some substitute discipline for repeatedly placing someone or something else at the center of their lives.

Despite what the so - called «religious» would have you believe, atheists are some of the kindest and most ethical people that I've ever known.

The experiences which I have in mind are clearly distinguishable from another kind of experience which I have had very frequently, and which I fancy many persons would also call the «consciousness of a presence.»

This so called religious scholar obciously knows nothing about the word of God, I find it very sad that these kind of people get away with tampering with God's word.

The kind of ethic promoted here by Paul is one which stresses liberation from the law — from those rules which prevent the maintenance of a loving community and for a freedom which accommodates differences between a people called to share in faith and life.

Susan Faludi maintains that since World War II American men have been cheated or «stiffed» out of just this kind of male mentoring (at one point she calls it «maternal masculinity») by the very people and organizations who could and should have provided it.

They attend to scripture; struggle to discern the gospel's call and demand on them and their congregations in particular contexts; lead worship, preach and teach; respond to requests for help of all kinds from myriad people in need; live with children, youth and adults through life cycles marked by both great joy and profound sadness; and take responsibility for the unending work of running an organization with buildings, budgets, and public relations and personnel issues.