SegWit would use a mechanism
called a soft fork to enact its change, meaning that those using the network would not be forced to pick between two competing versions of the software when an update is introduced.
Also beneficial, developers argued, was that it could be introduced via a mechanism
called a soft fork (meaning that miners who adopted it could co-exist on the network with those that did not).
This is
called a soft fork.
Not exact matches
For instance, he argued that The DAO project, which experienced a notorious hack in 2016 due to coding bugs in its ethereum smart contracts, exposed a problem where decentralized systems must resolve technological issues through what he
called «chaotic» hard or
soft forks.
The patch works by giving miners the opportunity to flag that they support the
soft fork, and then use their clients to lower a metric
called the «block gas limit», which puts a cap on the amount of gas (an element of ethereum transactions) that can be included in a block.
Bitcoin Core's original roadmap, the Segwit2x plan and users rallying around a change known as a «user - activated
soft fork» (UASF), all
call for the upgrade.
«One thing that I've been working on recently is a thing
called version bits, BIP 9, which is a mechanism to allow for simpler
soft fork deployments.
Bitcoin developers are working on a mechanism
called «versionbits» that would allow
soft -
forks to be implemented simultaneously and independently of each other.
As mentioned in previous issues of the Weekly Broadcast, the Bitcoin Core developers are currently working on a «
soft -
fork» proposal to implement a technique
called Segregated Witness, which solves a number of challenges with the Bitcoin protocol.
Some developers still seem to favor so -
called «miner - activated
soft forks» as a less disruptive option, but now some developers, such as Russell, seem more inclined to advocate for UASFs.
«Old nodes» — as we'll
call them for now — will consider a
soft -
forked chain valid because it doesn't break any «old rules.»
Bitcoin and the new Bitcoin Cash — After the
soft fork of Bitcoin on 1 August, and the hard
fork which ensued creating a new crypto
called Bitcoin Cash, the markets showed support of Bitcoin as the price remained stable.
Plus, so -
called user - activated
soft forks (UASFs) can have similar outcomes — splitting the chain into two blockchains with competing cryptocurrencies — if there's substantial disagreement.
Despite the scaling solution receiving its equal rap of criticism, it is being suggested that a so -
called user - activated
soft fork (UASF) may be the safest and most popular way to provide an end to the deadlock.
Eventually, some of core supporters came up with the idea of a UASF (User Activated
Soft Fork),
called BIP 148.
The
soft fork allowed for the adoption of code
called Segregated Witness, which in turn opened bitcoin to several new cryptographic innovations.
A
soft fork upgrade to realize relative timelocks,
called CheckSequenceVerify (CSV), was activated on the Bitcoin network by the summer of 2016.
Of course, miners make money on these transaction fees and are
calling for the implementation of SegWit or the
Soft Fork along with SegWit2x.
Even if it is
called a user activated
soft fork, in essence, it will be a hard
fork.
The current implementation of the
soft fork is aimed to blacklist what is now
called the «Dark DAO» account held by the attacker.
Meanwhile, Bitcoin Core supporters, which, naturally, include the core developers of Bitcoin, advocate a solution
called «Segregated Witness» that would be a «
soft fork», i.e. backwards compatible, although it would take more development work not only for the core but for many other companies in the Bitcoin ecosystem.
Cointelegraph The
call to raise a bounty for the development of a code that would enable a safe User Activated
Soft Fork has raised -LSB-...]