However, the opposite is true, showing once again the inadequacy of
caloric theory in general and the «eat less, move more» paradigm.
Not exact matches
Heat and light, being modes of motion, «phosphorescence» and «incandescence» are phenomena to which consciousness has been likened by the production -
theory: «As one sees a metallic rod, placed
in a glowing furnace, gradually heat itself, and — as the undulations of the
caloric grow more and more frequent — pass successively from the shades of bright red to dark red (sic), to white, and develope, as its temperature rises, heat and light, — so the living sensitive cells,
in presence of the incitations that solicit them, exalt themselves progressively as to their most interior sensibility, enter into a phase of erethism, and at a certain number of vibrations, set free (dégagent) pain as a physiological expression of this same sensibility superheated to a red - white.»
In theory, whey could cause weight gain by increasing your total
caloric intake.
The finding provides a central
theory that may help researchers make sense of disparate results from previous
caloric restriction studies, says Siegfried Hekimi, a geneticist at McGill University
in Montreal.
Consider the
Caloric Reduction as Primary (CRaP)
theory, also known as calories
in calories out.
For example,
in the erroneous
Caloric Reduction as Primary
theory, genetics should play no role.
Remember that one of the key assumptions of the CRaP
theory is that
in response to
caloric change, TEE does not change.
Note the
caloric expenditure equivalencies I present here are assuming no dietary compensation, something seen quite dramatically, for example,
in nut consumption
in Testing the Dietary Compensation
Theory.
However,
in the case of straight - on fasting, the
caloric theory holds as promised, resulting in a weight loss very close to that predicted if Caloric Expenditure stays
caloric theory holds as promised, resulting
in a weight loss very close to that predicted if
Caloric Expenditure stays
Caloric Expenditure stays stable.
In theory, you will need a 500cal / day reduction in caloric intake to observe a 1lb / wk rate of loss; however, this many not always be the case [8
In theory, you will need a 500cal / day reduction
in caloric intake to observe a 1lb / wk rate of loss; however, this many not always be the case [8
in caloric intake to observe a 1lb / wk rate of loss; however, this many not always be the case [8].
All the attempts to argue from authority are about as silly as Lord Kelvin espousing the
caloric theory of heat, Newton's belief
in alchemy, or even the widespread belief
in the luminiferous ether.
I have pointed out that I believe
in the GHE with equal fervour to my belief
in the existence of the luminiferous ether or the
caloric theory of heat.
The whole thing is about as silly as Lord Kelvin believing
in the
caloric theory of heat,
in part because Carnot's work used that
theory, wrong though it turned out to be.