Sentences with phrase «calories in vs»

I am a proponent of the notion that the dominant factor in determining weight gain or loss is the formula — calories in vs calorie out.

I do believe in calories in vs out, but the type of calorie does have different effects on hormones and such.

They said it had to do with calories in vs calories out.

Eating a diet which is primarily based on whole plant sources can and does result in metabolic changes such that it can be fair to say, it is not as simple as calories in vs calories out.

They don't really jive with the whole notion that you weight loss isn't just a matter of calories in vs calories out.

No matter what side of the fence you are on regarding calories in vs calories out, if you want to lose weight you have to reduce your caloric intake.

Things are far, far, far more nuanced that a simple scale of Calories In vs Calories Out.

On the calories in vs out balance sheet, alcohol gets categorized as reckless spending — it adds to the caloric bottom line, quite a lot so if you're not careful, while offering essentially zero satiation or nutritional value in return.

«Calories in Vs Calories Out» is true — meaning if your body uses more calories than it takes in, you will lose body fat.

While calories in vs calories out is the most important part of the equation, making sure your macros are properly calculated runs a close second.

The message is that it is calories in vs calories out that determines weight loss.

Weigh yourself every morning after you piss and log everything you eat on the #fitbit which will show you your calories in vs out.

So really, it is the overall calories in vs the calories out combined with the intensity level of your workouts.

calories in vs calories out it s definitely all about that... I lost around 8 kg, mostly fat within the last 4 - 5 months following weightx12 and working out 3 - 4 x week... now, the problem is that somehow only my chest almost stayed the same, so now yes I can see my abs, by my arms and especially my butt and my legs got too skinny, and my chest is still as if I only worked that muscle out... what do you suggest?

Would you say in order to lose fat, calories in vs calories out is all that matters?

They talk about «calories in VS calories out ``.

The process of losing weight really does come down to «calories in vs calories out» which means your body must be expending more daily calories (burning more energy) that it's getting.

In other words, NO — it's NOT your thyroid (unless you've got a confirmed diagnosis as such... and then guess what... it's STILL calories in vs calories out, you're just not burning as many as someone should at your height and weight).

What's the difference, doesn't it still come down to calories in vs calories out?

Anyone who is already healthy and using the aforementioned simplistic theory of «calories in vs calories out» is pretty sure to gradually lower their weight in the long - term.

Not exact matches

Besides loving the taste I really love that it miraculously only has 1.5 grams of fat per 2 Tablespoons versus 16 grams in regular peanut butter (or 45 calories vs 200 calories!)

In fact, we now KNOW that there is SO much more to the story than calories - in vs... [Read more..In fact, we now KNOW that there is SO much more to the story than calories - in vs... [Read more..in vs... [Read more...]

To put this in perspective, person A consumed enough calories to counter-act the deficit from the previous 6 days vs 2 days from person B.

This article from 2008 compared the effects of a ketogenic diet vs a low glycemic calorie restricted diet in obese type II diabetics and found that the HDL went up more and LDL also slightly increased (by a mean of 1.3 mg / dL) in those that followed a ketogenic diet.

As you might have noticed from the table above, the total fat calories burned was lower when staying in the fat burning zone (120 fat calories burned vs 135 fat calories burned for high - intensity exercise).

I'd also like to suggest that this has to relate to the extreme divergence in gallstone risk on a low fat vs high fat calorie restricted weight loss diet.

If you're working out to burn calories it pays to know which exercise burns more in an elliptical vs treadmill comparison.

Hi Dave, although calories do matter, they are not equal (in a high - carb vs high - fat diet).

In this interview Dr Valter Longo compares the difference between chronic calorie retriction vs short term fasting / refeeding... see 1:10:00

It is important to realize that there is more involved to losing body fat than «calories - in vs calories - out».

Also, eating more nuts and seeds (calorie - dense foods), as Dr. Greger has mentioned in a recent video on nuts vs weight - gain, does little to nothing for weight - gain!

Weight watchers points are based on the «calories - in vs calories - out» method of eight - loss, which is the only weight - loss method whichhas been proven to actually work.

I focused on calorie - in Vs calorie out ratio to lose weight and I have lost 1Kg per week for six weeks on a row, then without changing anything, I have experienced a plateau.

Thus meaning an isocaloric diet comprising of the exact same foods: raw vs cooked, would vary in calorie absorption.

I think the fact that he's eating more than 4000 calories per day will help to make up for the lower availability of some nutrients in animal vs plant - based foods.

We estimated the adjusted HRs by comparing the middle values of each quintile (Q) with the lowest quintile as reference (Q5, Q4, Q3, and Q2 vs Q1).35, 38 To examine the association between added sugar intake and CVD mortality by different cut points, ie, less than 10 % by the World Health Organization (in line with the American Heart Association's recommendation) 4,5 and less than 25 % by the Institute of Medicine, 3 we estimated the adjusted HRs by comparing participants who consumed 25 % or more, more than 10 %, and less than 25 % of their calories from added sugar with those who consumed less than 10 % of their calories from added sugar.

They will try and drown you in jargon and abstracts from PubMed until they're blue in the face, when the bottom line is these laws of physics are fairly well settled at this point and unless you have some kind of space - time anomoly in your digestive system that somehow allows the addition or subtraction of mass and energy across parallel dimensions, then the bottom line is calorie intake vs calories burned.