For historically, purveyors of
calumnies did not survive in ancient environments.
Not exact matches
If you are willing to accept the
calumny of an individual who was never fit to walk in Mother Teresa's shadow who despises Christianity and who is always ready to try to paint believers in the worst possible light, then you
do have an agenda — and it is probably the same as God - Hater Hitchens.
But to say of him, as Luther is reported to have
done in the «Table Talk», «in all his writings there is no statement anywhere about faith in Christ, about victory over sin» was a
calumny.
And for you to describe Cardinal Robert Sarah as an exponent of «bigotry» because he doesn't accept the New York Times's view of the moral life and cautions against the dictatorship of relativism borders on
calumny.
The proponents of these so - called marriages are powerful, and they
do not hesitate to use the tools of
calumny to defeat their opponents.
Even though I have been one of the greatest victims of the irresponsible section of the media, i.e. those who have created an industry from spewing
calumnies, falsehoods and outright fabrications against my person, I
do not regret one bit my role in repealing that old, discredited law.
St. Lewis
did not have to go to law to make public her evidence and argument against the
calumny (if
calumny it was).
Although his lordship had discussed «fraudulent
calumny», a separate ground for avoiding testamentary dispositions involving the poisoning of a testator's mind against someone with a natural claim on his bounty, by the casting of dishonest aspersions, he
did not appear to apply that ground in the result.