Sentences with phrase «campaign against scientists»

There's the smear campaign against Scientists and even the Science itself.

Greenpeace is engaged in a scurrilous intimidation campaign against scientists who dare to differ from the climate - alarmist orthodoxy — and who are associated with The Heartland Institute's efforts to promote their research.

Antidemocratic, hateful, and coal - backed smear campaign against a scientist I've sometimes disagreed with but who has every right to state his case at Penn State or anywhere else.

Not exact matches

is a call to defend life and freedom against this oppressive claws of corporate control,» stated Cristino Panerio, National Coordinator of the Magsasaka at Siyentipiko para sa Pag - unlad ng Agrikultura (MASIPAG), a local farmer - scientist movement in the forefront of campaigns against golden rice commercialization in the past decade.

She was president from 1976 of the Pugwash Conferences, in which scientists from East and West, both sides of the Iron Curtain, met to campaign against nuclear and chemical weapons, exchanging information they had gathered.

They have campaigned against animal research even when it remains necessary, in some cases committing violence against scientists.

The coverage of the resulting Scopes «monkey trial» in 1925 turned the American public against religious fundamentalism for a generation, and the persistent campaigns against evolution drove most scientists into the Republican Party.

Claude Allègre, a French scientist and former minister of education, was running a very efficient ideological campaign against climate science.

The Wall Street Journal leads the campaign against climate science, writing editorials charging that scientists are engaged in a massive conspiracy.

The academies» statement is just the latest rejection of the conclusions by the paper's authors, led by Gilles - Eric Séralini, a scientist at the University of Caen who has long campaigned against genetically modified foods and attracted criticism for flawed science.

Pingback: Hate campaign against climate scientists hits the denier spin - cycle «Graham Readfearn

He suggests that the origin of this objection is most beneficial to a general PR campaign against climate scientists, encouraging politicians and public alike to ignore the advice of climate science.

Report: UN warns of threat to human progress; Transient Middle Eocene Atmospheric CO2 and Temperature Variations; Climate scientists plan campaign against global warming skeptics; Inaccurate news reports misrepresent AGU climate - science initiative; climate crisis is no crisis (media confusion); ClimateGate One Year Later; Energy & Environment Hearing; Philippines: Aquino calls for lifestyle change

Instead we choose the narrative we find most convincing, whether it's -LRB-(greedy grant - seeking scientist supporting Al Gore's vision for controlling us all)-RRB- or -LRB-(greedy carbon - heavy corporations fueling disinformation campaigns against truth - seeking academics)-RRB-.

Notorious for... A vitriolic campaign against the UK Government's chief scientist Sir David King for his alarmingly conventional views on the causes of global warming.

Mashey never uses the word «lies,» but somehow it seemed an appropriate illustration of what he finds underlying the recent campaign against climate science, scientists and anyone who respects their work.

Joe, you mention that «Lewandowsky falsely linked climate skeptics to moon landing hoaxism, and free marketeers to rejection of beliefs they overwhelmingly endorsed» Far worse, his compatriot Prof David Karoly falsely linked skeptics to an (imaginary) «relentless campaign» of electronic death threats against Australian climate scientists, none of which Karoly deigned or was asked to produce as evidence despite the fact that he was alleging the existence of a serious (and despicable) criminal conspiracy.

Scientists have always been engaged in > politics, sometimes for good (advocating vaccination campaigns against > smallpox, for example) and sometimes for ill (arguing for the improvement > of > the «white» race by eugenics), but scientists have had their «meddling» > fingers in politics for centuries, maybe millennia, without any lasting > ill > effects on our current ability to investigate the workings of the world or > > to influence the development of public polScientists have always been engaged in > politics, sometimes for good (advocating vaccination campaigns against > smallpox, for example) and sometimes for ill (arguing for the improvement > of > the «white» race by eugenics), but scientists have had their «meddling» > fingers in politics for centuries, maybe millennia, without any lasting > ill > effects on our current ability to investigate the workings of the world or > > to influence the development of public polscientists have had their «meddling» > fingers in politics for centuries, maybe millennia, without any lasting > ill > effects on our current ability to investigate the workings of the world or > > to influence the development of public policy today.

The proposition, which would entail drilling near to the Amazon reef (which was only widely revealed to scientists in 2016) faces public opposition and a campaign against it by Greenpeace.

As a recent study from the University of Bristol documented, climate scientists have been so distracted and intimidated by the relentless campaign against them that they tend to avoid any statements that might get them labeled «alarmists,» retreating into a world of charts and data.

The accusation of criminality against leading climate scientists takes the denialist campaign of harassment and intimidation to new depths, and immediately conjures up images of McCarthyism.

Bart V: I have little confidence in any scientist or group of scientists who imagines that they are up against «a well - orchestrated and well - oiled misinformation campaign» when said campaign is actually composed of a hodgepodge of retirees, bloggers, commenters, and maverick scientists, and depends to no small degree on top climate scientists behaving like a combination of Orwell's Ministry of Truth and the Keystone Kops.

His own citations only seem to fuel the fire regarding a enviro - activist misinformation campaign against skeptic climate scientists that's entirely based on just one single set of worthless evidence.

To recap: Ross Gelbspan accuses a prominent skeptic scientist of being involved in a global warming «misinformation campaign», and he claims a key «leaked memo» phrase he supposedly found is the smoking gun evidence for his overall accusation against skeptic scientists.

Why is communicating climate change science hard, in which she wondered why some people don't accept what they are told by climate scientists, and claimed that «There is also a well - funded campaign that seeks to spread disinformation about climate science» and «we're up against powerful forces».

Climate scientist Bethan Davies, who appears to believe this myth, wrote a blog post, Why is communicating climate change science hard, in which she wondered why some people don't accept what they are told by climate scientists, and claimed that «There is also a well - funded campaign that seeks to spread disinformation about climate science» and «we're up against powerful forces».

Of all the climate deniers, one scientist has been particularly closely involved in the campaign against the climate science consensus for the majority of his career: Dr. Willie Soon.

By both outsourcing the misinformation campaign and allowing their scientists to publish research in peer - reviewed journals — where it was available to but largely unseen by the public — the oil companies tried to buffer themselves against the legal liability that took down the tobacco industry.

A campaign of intimidation was meanwhile being waged against climate scientists by influential forces outside the halls of Congress who helped direct hate speech, threats, bullying, and taunting at individual climate scientists.