A data leak by a company called AggregateIQ has revealed that the obscure Canadian firm developed the software Cambridge Analytica used and sold to clients during the 2016 election to help Republican
campaigns target voters, security firm UpGuard revealed this week.
The firm helped the Trump
campaign target voters.
Not exact matches
Cambridge Analytica is being scrutinized for the methods it used during the 2016 presidential election, after executives with the British data firm boasted about their ability to covertly
target voters, entrap politicians, and launch propaganda
campaigns.
Because Cambridge Analytica had ties to the Trump
campaign prior to the 2016 election, some suspect that data may have been harnessed to sway
voters via
targeted political messaging.
Cambridge Analytica is under investigation in both the U.S. and the U.K. for the way it obtained data on as many as 87 million users from Facebook and for whether it used that data to
target voters on behalf of the Trump
campaign in the U.S. and the Brexit referendum in the U.K.
French presidential candidate Emmanuel Macron's
campaign said on Friday it had been the
target of a «massive» computer hack that dumped its
campaign mails online 1-1/2 days before
voters go to the polls to choose between the centrist and his far - right rival Marine Le Pen.
Masses of data about each
voter's political tendencies - gathered through public sources and through
campaign contact - allowed Obama for America (OFA) to
target voters more precisely than ever before.
In September 2011, the Obama
campaign launched Operation Vote, which focused on eight
target groups: women, blacks, seniors, Hispanics, Asian - Americans, Jews, gays, and young
voters.
Denise Feriozzi, deputy executive director for Emily's List, said that millennial women are a «hugely powerful group of
voters,» and that the ad
campaigns are specifically
targeted toward building long - term support through brands and outlets that they identify with.
Some news accounts indicate that his
campaign stopped using the firm's data after the South Carolina primary in late February 2016, though federal
campaign records show more than $ 670,000 in payments to the firm for «media /
voter modeling» or «
voter ID
targeting / web service» in March and June, plus $ 218,000 for «media» and «digital service / web service.»
The consulting firm relied on Facebook data to profile and
target voters while advising the Trump
campaign in 2016.
But if the ongoing investigations conclude that the Trump
campaign did help Russia
target voters, expect to hear more about Cambridge Analytica.
The goal, as The Guardian reported, was to combine social media's reach with big data analytical tools to create psychographic profiles that could then be manipulated in what Bannon and Cambridge Analytica investor Robert Mercer allegedly referred to as a military - style psychological operations
campaign —
targeting U.S.
voters.
«AIQ must have obtained these email addresses for British
voters targeted in these
campaigns from a different source,» is the company's conclusion.
In addition to the previous media articles showing how Cambridge Analytica used Facebook data to
target US
voters in the US 2016 presidential
campaign, a new story broke out last night involving the embattled analytics firm.
A company whistleblower revealed that they advised the Trump
campaign on how to
target ads, both to boost Trump and suppress Democratic
voter turnout.
CA, which has touted its ability to create personality profiles of
voters for ad
targeting purposes, was hired to run data operations for the Trump
campaign.
In another section on the political
campaign page, Facebook states for $ 1, candidates could buy two pieces of direct mail, or they could
target 200
voters on Facebook.
Facebook has faced a global outcry and sharp questions about its privacy safeguards after reports revealed that an independent researcher passed information covering some 50m users to the consulting firm Cambridge Analytica, which were then used by Donald Trump's
campaign team to
target swing
voters in the 2016 presidential election.
The latest allegations — that a Trump
campaign consulting firm with Russian connections used improperly obtained Facebook data on tens of millions of Americans to
target voters — raise disturbing questions about the roles of both Facebook and Russia.
For many, the Cambridge Analytica data is seen as likely connected to the Russian troll farms that
targeted U.S.
voters with misinformation via social media during the 2016
campaign.
With regards to the Facebook scandal specifically, Cambridge Analytica are accused of harvesting personal data from 50million Facebook profiles, data which was then used to psychologically profile victims to drive advertising
campaigns,
targeted at
voters in the US elections.
That's the question many Americans are asking after revelations that a data - mining firm working for the Trump
campaign improperly got its hands on the personal information of tens of millions of Facebook users and created detailed profiles that were used to
target unsuspecting
voters in the presidential election.
Cambridge Analytica specializes in using online data to create
voter personality profiles in order to
target users with political messages and ran data operations for Donald Trump's presidential
campaign.
Cambridge Analytica, a firm that specializes in using online data to create
voter personality profiles in order to
target users with political messages, ran data operations for Donald Trump's presidential
campaign.
This was allegedly done to specifically
target and influence the
voters in the electorate during Donald Trump's presidential
campaign in 2016.
Bloomberg discovered that the Trump
campaign sought to depress Hillary Clinton's
voter turnout by
targeting African - American
voters with a South Park - style animation that said: «Hillary Thinks African Americans are Super Predators.»
Nobody seemed to care when President Obama's
campaign used the same loophole to get data on and
target tens of millions of
voters.
Though of course, even for some local races, ethnic niche sites (for instance) might well be perfect
targets — it all depends on which
voters those
campaigns need to reach and the relative costs of reaching them through different means.
Chris Cillizza and Jim VandeHei have a great article in today's Post, «In Ohio, a Battle of Databases,» that looks in detail at how
campaigns work with data behind the scenes to find
voters, hit them with
targeted messages and ultimately get them to the polls.
For instance, he discussed the fact that electoral
campaigns spend a huge amount of effort building up volunteer lists, email lists and
voter target lists, but that the data tend to go away as soon the election is over (particularly if the
campaign loses).
Cookie -
targeting and similar technologies can help
campaigns get the most value out of even last - minute ads, since they're ideal for delivering GOTV messages to the
voters you need to reach.
Back in August, we looked at a long series of questions the
campaign could answer, ranging from the effectiveness of mobile canvassing to the possibility of a
voter backlash against highly
targeted advertising.
Hilary Benn has made it clear he'd prefer to see Labour have its own, separate
campaign targeting the concerns of traditional Labour
voters.
As
voter file cookie
targeting falters in this
campaign season, other options remain.
For instance, a
campaign might run
voter - file
targeted ads designed to recruit and persuade local
voters, plus geo -
targeted Google and Facebook ads also aimed (as best as possible) at local
voters.
In this
campaign season, if political advertisers are only cookie
targeting a
voter file, they're in trouble.
Another consideration: just about any
campaign can also benefit from having a body of clear, topical and
targeted content on published on the web in a variety of outlets, since
voters, bloggers and journalists alike will be turning to Google and other search engines for basic information about races and candidates.
Even before the final weekend push, for instance, Democrats had used the
Voter Activation Network to
target over 50 % more
voter outreach than at the same point in the previous midterm
campaign (though I was surprised it wasn't higher).
Mr. Delany added that digital advertising would help
target key demographic groups of
voters who will be important to either Democratic
campaign for a win in California.
We were there with a simple mission: sell the idea of working with DSPolitical to launch the first
voter file
targeted digital ad
campaign in British political history.
Political
campaigns typically use search advertising primarily for long - term list - building, but with a big chunk of February 5th
voters apparently still undecided, shouldn't
targeted search ads be an effective way to reach people who are still making up their minds?
If
voters in the United Kingdom weren't accustomed to encountering
campaign ads on television and the radio, how would they respond to such communications when
targeted with banner ads and videos online and on their mobile devices?
«This digital ad
campaign will educate
voters in
targeted districts about this morally bankrupt repeal and will hold Representatives Faso and Tenney for this cruel plan.»
Regardless of their size, though, just about any
campaign can also benefit from having a body of clear, topical and
targeted content on the web in a variety of outlets, since
voters, bloggers and journalists alike will be turning to Mr. Google for basic information about local races.
The willingness of our first - time U.K. clients to work with DSPolitical to conduct a
targeted,
voter - matched digital advertising
campaign — even on a limited scale — should put other democracies on notice that such innovative new
voter engagement techniques are on the way.
We only had a few minutes to talk, but we got to cover a little bit about how
campaigns build
target profiles to reach individual
voters with messages tailored for them — at least in theory.
Since Brexiteers and the 2016 Cruz and Trump
campaigns contracted with Cambridge for help
targeting voters in the UK and US, and special counsel Robert Mueller has subpeoned documents from the company in his investigation into possible Trump / Russia collusion, politicians quickly took notice.
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued Patent No. 8,763,033 to Audience Partners for its proprietary technology allowing political
campaigns to
target digital advertising using
voter registration records and a host of other data....
TechPresident reports that the Obama
campaign tested their new «Dashboard» system to let volunteers from around the country make calls into Wisconsin, the AFL - CIO has trialed software that matches
voter lists with volunteers» Facebook friends to let them call
targets that they actually know rather than total strangers, and the Walker
campaign combined VoIP with digital
voter files to automate the connection between identification calls and data entry.