Sentences with phrase «canceled each other out over»

Investors also have to remember that while currencies can fluctuate wildly from country to country in the short - to intermediate - term, these differences tend to cancel each other out over the long - term.

The astronomers were surprised to find that the galactic motions they measured did not cancel each other out over the volume they studied.

In their research, which was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Christy and McNider found the climatic effects of El Niño / La Niña warming and cooling events in the eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean largely cancelled each other out over the study period.

Negative and positive PDO cancel each other out over that period, so we can more or less discount that effect.

Not exact matches

In other words, over the course of the full year, the additional costs from the new pilot contract will essentially cancel out the tailwind from facing an easy year - over-year cost comparison in Q2.

Scattered light signals arriving over different paths will actually cancel each other out: The troughs of one wave will align with the crests of another.

If you need to cancel a recurring walk, or for any other changes, just send an email to [email protected] as always, if you feel more comfortable doing your scheduling over the phone, you can always call us during business hours (Mon - Fri 9am - 6 pm) at [phone] and we'll help you out.

However, oftentimes the uncertainties will cancel each other out, even over extended periods of time.

Odd that, Must be some kind of effing fluke that happens over and over again where thousands of other factors accidentally cancel out the errors in the design so that they work precisely as designed despite the impossible physics.

A2) The Sun is the source of all this energy as it is the hottest thing around, and by the greenhouse explanation above the GHGs redistribute insolation into the ocean until their heating from above and the tendency for warm water to rise once again cancel each other out and the new stable (w.r.t. averaging over 24h) vertical gradient is attained.

Fortunately, the negative and positive forcings are roughly equal and cancel each other out, and the natural forcings over the past half century have also been approximately zero (Meehl 2004), so the radiative forcing from CO2 alone gives us a good estimate as to how much we expect to see the Earth's surface temperature change.

Indeed, the projected growth from the oilsands sector alone from 2005 to 2020 is large enough to cancel out all other emission reductions taking place elsewhere in the Canadian economy over the same period.

Or, in other words, if we assume that AGW necessarily implies that global mean surface temps will rise at some point in the future (although we might argue about estimated probabilities of the extent) on the assumption that mitigating natural variations will cancel out over the long term.

The other (too ludicrous to have been mentioned by Taleb) is well, we may have missed the 20 - year projection due to (add in excuses cited above), but our long term projection still stands, because these unforeseen factors cancel out over the long term

IPCC tells us that all anthropogenic forcing components other than CO2 (aerosols, other GHGs, etc.) cancelled one another out over this period, so the forcing from CO2 = total anthropogenic forcing ~ 1.6 W / m ^ 2.

The problem with that argument is that over long periods of time (like the six decades since 1950), positive and negative phases of ocean cycles tend to cancel each other out, and thus internal variability doesn't have a large influence on long - term temperatures.

Seasonal, annual and even decadal variations would cancel each other out if measured over a long enough period.

This tells us that over this period all other anthropogenic forcing components (aerosols, other GHGs, land use changes, surface albedo changes, etc.) essentially cancelled one another out, so we can ignore your statement «we suspect that aerosols caused cooling», as this is already compensated for by other anthropogenic warming beside CO2.

All other anthropogenic forcings (aerosols, other GHGs, etc.) are estimated by IPCC (AR4) to have cancelled one another out over the past (AR5 actually has them slightly positive on balance).