That presumption may be rebutted by evidence of suspicious circumstances, in which case the burden reverts to the party supporting the Will to prove testamentary
capacity on the balance of probabilities (Vout v. Hay, SCC 1995).
[21] I agree with the principles advanced by Mr. Ostrikoff; however, it remains true that it is for the plaintiff to prove a claim for past loss of earning
capacity on a balance of probabilities, and that an award must keep in touch with the evidence before the court.
Not exact matches
Section 2 (4) makes it clear that «any question whether a person lacks
capacity within the meaning
of this Act must be decided
on the
balance of probabilities».
[26] In an action for proof
of will in solemn form, the party propounding the will must prove
on a
balance of probabilities that the will was executed in compliance with the statutory formalities, that the will - maker knew and approved
of the contents
of the will and that the will - maker had testamentary
capacity: Vout at paras. 19 - 20.
This process requires the person propounding the validity
of a will to prove
on a
balance of probabilities that the will was completed in compliance with the necessary legal formalities, the will maker knew and approved
of the contents
of the will and the will maker had the necessary mental
capacity to make a will (called testamentary
capacity).
This is a lower threshold than in the case
of a substantive declaration, in which case the Court must be satisfied,
on a
balance of probabilities, that the person lacks
capacity in relation to the matter in question.